Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo V110-15IKB (Pentium 4415U, SSD, HD-Display)

Ganador precio-rendimiento. El portátil de 15.6" de Lenovo trae un procesador Kaby Lake, una SSD, 8 GB de memoria de trabajo. En total, el paquete cuesta casi 400€. Sin embargo, es normal que el portátil tenga algunas deficiencias por este precio.
Sascha Mölck, Sven Kloevekorn (traducido por Francisco García),
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (V110 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 610, Núcleo: 300-950 MHz, doble canal, 21.20.16.4678
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2133, doble canal, un banco de memoria (ocupado), 4 GB soldados
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels 100 PPI, Chi Mei N156BGA-EA2, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco duro
Ramxel S121 RTNRB256RFM4KWDL, 256 GB 
, 190 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC236 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audiocontroller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: combo de audio, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidad óptica
Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 22.9 x 380 x 262
Battería
32 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: SD
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, McAfee LiveSafe (demo), MS Office 365 (demo), 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.9 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 292 g
Precio
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

384.3 mm 254.6 mm 24.3 mm 2 kg378 mm 265 mm 30 mm 2.2 kg384 mm 255 mm 24 mm 2.1 kg381.8 mm 258 mm 24.6 mm 2.4 kg379 mm 258 mm 23.95 mm 2.1 kg380 mm 262 mm 22.9 mm 1.9 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP 15-ba077ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼98% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.4 MB/s ∼97%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
 
23.7 MB/s ∼87% -10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼83% -14%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
17.8 MB/s ∼65% -33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39.4 MB/s ∼100% +43%
HP 15-ba077ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.3 MB/s ∼97% +39%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.7 MB/s ∼93% +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.6 MB/s ∼70%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼68% -4%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
310 MBit/s ∼98% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
287 MBit/s ∼91%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
186 MBit/s ∼59% -35%
HP 15-ba077ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
43 MBit/s ∼14% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
341 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
335 MBit/s ∼98%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
312 MBit/s ∼91% -7%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
272 MBit/s ∼80% -19%
HP 15-ba077ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
54 MBit/s ∼16% -84%
246
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
Chi Mei N156BGA-EA2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 265 cd/m² Médio: 233 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
iluminación: 75 %
Brillo con batería: 245 cd/m²
Contraste: 540:1 (Negro: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.69 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 13.12 | 0.64-98 Ø6
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 15-ba077ng
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Response Times
-41%
-16%
-56%
-10%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (21, 18)
42 (21, 21)
-8%
43 (21, 22, Plateau)
-10%
58
-49%
40 (20, 20)
-3%
68 (32, 36)
-74%
Response Time Black / White *
19 (14, 5)
22 (6, 16)
-16%
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
-21%
23
-21%
22 (6, 16)
-16%
26 (20, 6)
-37%
PWM Frequency
10000 (20)
50 (70)
-99%
200 (90)
-98%
217 (90)
-98%
Screen
-7%
-7%
7%
-2%
1%
Brightness middle
243
209
-14%
201
-17%
253
4%
219
-10%
226
-7%
Brightness
233
200
-14%
202
-13%
246
6%
222
-5%
217
-7%
Brightness Distribution
75
88
17%
92
23%
86
15%
85
13%
91
21%
Black Level *
0.45
0.56
-24%
0.67
-49%
0.44
2%
0.39
13%
0.58
-29%
Contrast
540
373
-31%
300
-44%
575
6%
562
4%
390
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11.69
12.21
-4%
10.36
11%
9.2
21%
12.67
-8%
9.84
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.08
20.66
-3%
18.88
6%
17.68
12%
20.99
-5%
16.77
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.12
13.48
-3%
11.06
16%
11.05
16%
13.82
-5%
11.1
15%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.34 94%
2.56 86%
2.55 86%
2.63 84%
2.35 94%
CCT
16905 38%
15364 42%
11368 57%
11451 57%
15633 42%
11979 54%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
38
3%
36
-3%
36
-3%
35
-5%
39
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
60
2%
57
-3%
56
-5%
55
-7%
61
3%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-24% / -15%
-12% / -9%
-25% / -7%
-6% / -3%
-35% / -16%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 10000 Hz ≤ 20 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 10000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 20 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 10000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9584 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
19 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 5 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 24 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (24.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 21 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 43 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (38.7 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6703
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
8169
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3587
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
17.51 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.01 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
29.14 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
241 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
95 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼50% +22%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
100 Points ∼43% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
95 Points ∼41%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
84 Points ∼37% -12%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
80 Points ∼35% -16%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼23% -44%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
50 Points ∼22% -47%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼7% +20%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
260 Points ∼6% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
241 Points ∼6%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
222 Points ∼5% -8%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
216 Points ∼5% -10%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
166 Points ∼4% -31%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼4% -32%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
8797 Points ∼13% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
8169 Points ∼13%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
7388 Points ∼11% -10%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
7188 Points ∼11% -12%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
6169 Points ∼9% -24%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
5149 Points ∼8% -37%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
3877 Points ∼36% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
3587 Points ∼33%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
3227 Points ∼30% -10%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
2596 Points ∼24% -28%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1917 Points ∼18% -47%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1675 Points ∼15% -53%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
5371 Points ∼7% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
5270 Points ∼7%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
5136 Points ∼6% -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4563 Points ∼6% -13%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
4265 Points ∼5% -19%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3918 Points ∼5% -26%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
2510 Points ∼51%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
2340 Points ∼48% -7%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
2062 Points ∼42% -18%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
1943 Points ∼40% -23%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1395 Points ∼29% -44%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1307 Points ∼27% -48%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
5636 Points ∼14% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
5455 Points ∼13%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
4899 Points ∼12% -10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
4723 Points ∼12% -13%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4364 Points ∼11% -20%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3460 Points ∼8% -37%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
2947 Points ∼46% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
2816 Points ∼44%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
2468 Points ∼38% -12%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
2158 Points ∼33% -23%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1581 Points ∼24% -44%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1356 Points ∼21% -52%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
5895 Points ∼10% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
5630 Points ∼10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
3016 Points ∼45% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
2943 Points ∼44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
164.22 Points ∼44% +4%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
160.64 Points ∼43% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
157.15 Points ∼42%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
142.55 Points ∼38% -9%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
134 Points ∼36% -15%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
90.06 Points ∼24% -43%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
75.5 Points ∼20% -52%
PCMark 7 Score
4795 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3230 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3514 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4224 puntos
PCMark 10 Score
2492 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points ∼54% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
HD Graphics 610, Pentium 4415U, Ramxel S121 RTNRB256RFM4KWDL
3230 Points ∼53%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
2937 Points ∼48% -9%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
2777 Points ∼46% -14%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1993 Points ∼33% -38%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1956 Points ∼32% -39%
Ramxel S121 RTNRB256RFM4KWDL
Sequential Read: 477.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 284.2 MB/s
512K Read: 356.3 MB/s
512K Write: 282.3 MB/s
4K Read: 24.15 MB/s
4K Write: 71.93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 283.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.3 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Ramxel S121 RTNRB256RFM4KWDL
HP 15-ba077ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-19%
-91%
-91%
-5%
-92%
Write 4k QD32
257.3
138
-46%
0.991
-100%
0.473
-100%
228.5
-11%
0.706
-100%
Read 4k QD32
283.7
143.1
-50%
0.861
-100%
0.921
-100%
141.3
-50%
0.595
-100%
Write 4k
71.93
62.68
-13%
1.089
-98%
0.283
-100%
88.01
22%
0.836
-99%
Read 4k
24.15
20.99
-13%
0.474
-98%
0.372
-98%
20.99
-13%
0.342
-99%
Write 512
282.3
283.1
0%
24.23
-91%
26.71
-91%
289.4
3%
19.83
-93%
Read 512
356.3
333.4
-6%
22.5
-94%
32.94
-91%
321.2
-10%
20.82
-94%
Write Seq
284.2
243.3
-14%
96.57
-66%
88.49
-69%
322.1
13%
77.93
-73%
Read Seq
477.4
447.4
-6%
107.6
-77%
92.05
-81%
508.9
7%
96.48
-80%
3DMark 05 Standard
11469 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard
6869 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
3715 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
1005 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
50537 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4422 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
566 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
272 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A10-9600P
1921 Points ∼3% +118%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P
1856 Points ∼3% +111%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points ∼3% +87%
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1535 Points ∼3% +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1401 Points ∼2% +59%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points ∼2% +43%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9420
1096 Points ∼2% +25%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U
1090 Points ∼2% +24%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
899 Points ∼2% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
880 Points ∼1%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
847 Points ∼1% -4%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points ∼1% -29%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A10-9600P
1337 Points ∼3% +115%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P
1213 Points ∼3% +95%
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1028 Points ∼2% +65%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
989 Points ∼2% +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
822 Points ∼2% +32%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9420
642 Points ∼1% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
622 Points ∼1%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
621 Points ∼1% 0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A10-9600P
8822 Points ∼5% +61%
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8482 Points ∼4% +54%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P
8107 Points ∼4% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7152 Points ∼4% +30%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6314 Points ∼3% +15%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
5664 Points ∼3% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
5495 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
5249 Points ∼3% -4%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9420
3661 Points ∼2% -33%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
79437 Points ∼11% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
63413 Points ∼8% +4%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
62653 Points ∼8% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U
60904 Points ∼8%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P
53693 Points ∼7% -12%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A10-9600P
52687 Points ∼7% -13%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
51590 Points ∼7% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
42396 Points ∼6% -30%
bajo medio alto ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 125.5 61.2 fps
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) 50.7 29.4 fps
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 27.8 18.6 13.6 fps
Anno 2070 (2011) 66 29.3 17.9 fps
Diablo III (2012) 39.4 25.8 22.4 fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 94.2 70.4 42.8 fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 50.8 23.7 16 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39.1 20.4 17.7 fps
GRID: Autosport (2014) 106 32.7 fps
Sims 4 (2014) 168.9 32.5 fps
F1 2014 (2014) 61 42 fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 38.5 25.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 52.5 34.9 fps
World of Warships (2015) 47.3 28.8 fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 22.4 16.2 fps
Overwatch (2016) 27 19.2 fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 16.1 8.9 fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 66.1 41.1 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 18.9 fps
For Honor (2017) 13.5 fps
Rocket League (2017) 48.9 fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 57.7 55.8 fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 35.1 fps

Ruido

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 31.6 dB(A)
Carga
34.3 / 34.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.433.431.632.731.132.42532.233.430.732.130.532.23134.735.639.135.335.134.74030.831.334.829.130.630.85031.130.632.729.829.131.16327.926.929.228.926.927.98026.827.827.126.826.926.810027.126.42726.125.927.112525.325.92724.524.325.316025.226.624.323.923.625.220026.727.328.522.92326.725031.232.226.521.721.631.231524.424.323.721.220.824.440025.825.322.820.420.425.850026.425.921.419.519.626.463023.623.520.918.918.523.680022.822.719.818.718.322.8100022.822.819.2181822.8125023.123.118.917.917.823.1160024.123.618.717.717.324.1200023.222.418.517.617.823.2250020.920.918.317.717.820.93150202018.217.917.820400019.819.818.418.118.219.8500018.71918.318.318.318.7630018.918.818.718.418.218.9800018.618.718.718.718.618.61000018.718.718.718.618.718.71250018.818.818.818.818.818.81600019.119.31918.91919.1SPL34.434.331.630.630.534.4N2.22.21.71.41.42.2median 23.1median 22.8median 19median 18.7median 18.6median 23.1Delta332.31.71.83hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Carga Máx.
 32.5 °C28.1 °C22.8 °C 
 30.3 °C30 °C22.7 °C 
 26.8 °C30.8 °C24.1 °C 
Máximo: 32.5 °C
Médio: 27.6 °C
22.6 °C23.1 °C28.6 °C
23.3 °C24.8 °C31.7 °C
23.9 °C28.1 °C29.8 °C
Máximo: 31.7 °C
Médio: 26.2 °C
Conector de corriente  40.3 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.8 °C / -5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.331.131.32531.630.531.63135.235.135.24031.630.631.65031.229.131.2632726.9278027.526.927.510027.225.927.212527.624.327.616024.523.624.520028.82328.825030.421.630.431522.520.822.540026.420.426.450029.719.629.763036.918.536.980042.218.342.2100048.21848.2125054.217.854.2160055.617.355.6200059.517.859.5250057.817.857.831506117.861400065.218.265.250006718.367630070.218.270.2800066.918.666.91000058.218.758.21250058.118.858.11600055.51955.5SPL75.230.575.2N27.41.427.4median 54.2median 18.6median 54.2Delta16.61.816.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.44 / 0.44 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.8 / 6.8 / 8.2 Watt
Carga midlight 24 / 26.3 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40)
3h 53min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
356 min ∼14% +53%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
347 min ∼13% +49%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
321 min ∼12% +38%
HP 15-ba077ng
A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh
296 min ∼11% +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Pentium 4415U, HD Graphics 610, 32 Wh
233 min ∼9%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh
201 min ∼8% -14%

Pro

+ pantalla mate
+ SSD
+ se ejecuta silenciosamente
+ temperaturas bajas
+ ac Wi-Fi

Contra

- pantalla oscura de bajo contraste
- la carcasa podría ser más rígida
- sólo un año de garantía
- ventilador de zumbido
- altavoces pobres
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE, Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE, Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

El Lenovo V110-15IKB cuenta con todo lo que necesita un portátil de uso doméstico: un procesador suficientemente fuerte, una SSD rápida y una RAM que funciona en modo de doble canal. También tiene instalado un teclado decente. En total el paquete cuesta unos 400 €. 

El portatil de 15.6" de Lenovo consigue puntos con un muy buen ratio precio-rendimiento. 


El nivel de precios relativamente bajo también tiene sus pegas. La pantalla no gana ningún premio. Es demasiado oscura, su contraste es demasiado bajo, y también depende del ángulo de visión. El aguante de la batería en Wi-Fi y la rigidez relativamente baja de la carcasa excluyen en gran medida el uso móvil. Además, Lenovo sólo incluye una garantía de un año. No se puede culpar al bajo precio por el ventilador que chirriaba - después de todo, hay ventiladores ruidosos hasta en dispositivos más caros. Sin embargo, esto no debería ser el caso en cualquier computadora portátil.


 Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

 

 


 

Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE - 10/10/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
71 / 98 → 72%
Teclado
72%
Ratón
83%
Conectividad
39 / 80 → 48%
Peso
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Battería
74%
Pantalla
75%
Rendimiento de juegos
53 / 68 → 77%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
76 / 92 → 82%
Temperatura
96%
Ruido
92%
Audio
30%
Cámara
23 / 85 → 27%
Médio
65%
77%
Office - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo V110-15IKB (Pentium 4415U, SSD, HD-Display)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-10-13 (Update: 2017-10-13)