Breve análisis del portátil MSI GE63VR Raider-075 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070, Full-HD)

Name: Breve análisis del portátil MSI GE63VR Raider-075 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070, Full-HD)
Item: MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Rating: 85
Author: Sven Kloevekorn

Sven Kloevekorn, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traducido por Francisco García), 11/03/2017

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake MSI Laptop / Notebook Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR) Windows

Atreviéndose a ser imperfecto. ¿Qué, un panel TN en un portátil gaming de $ 1800? Sí, MSI lo ha vuelto a hacer y priorizó 120 Hz y tiempos de respuesta rápidos. Si puedes trabajar con esto, probablemente pases por alto los pocos problemas que tiene este portátil que, por lo demás, está bien hecho. Solo una de las decisiones de MSI es bastante cuestionable.

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Alienware 15 R3 MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Asus Zephyrus GX501VS

left: Kensington, Ethernet, HDMI, Mini-DisplayPort, USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, headphone jack, microphone jack

right: SD card reader, 2x USB-A 3.0, power supply

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	178 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s ∼45% -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	200 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89 MB/s ∼45% -55%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	692 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	685 MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	652 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	623 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	560 MBit/s ∼90% +4%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	540 MBit/s ∼87%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	456 MBit/s ∼73% -16%


288 cd/m²	297 cd/m²	278 cd/m²
273 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	250 cd/m²	256 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 297 cd/m² Médio: 273.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 285 cd/m²
Contraste: 1239:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.52 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.41 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.05

Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), 1920x1080, 15.6	Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), 1920x1080, 15.6	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		-187%	-114%	-268%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	9.6 (5.2, 4.4)	36 (18, 18) -275%	25 (12, 13) -160%	33.2 (18.4, 14.8) -246%
Response Time Black / White *	7.2 (5, 2.2)	26.4 (15.2, 11.2) -267%	12 (4, 8) -67%	28 (15.6, 12.4) -289%
PWM Frequency	26000 (25)	20830 (90) -20%
Screen		-26%	-66%	-10%
Brightness middle	285	295 4%	386 35%	307.1 8%
Brightness	273	274 0%	382 40%	309 13%
Brightness Distribution	84	88 5%	93 11%	86 2%
Black Level *	0.23	0.32 -39%	0.39 -70%	0.35 -52%
Contrast	1239	922 -26%	990 -20%	877 -29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.52	4.59 -30%	10.2 -190%	3.4 3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.18	11 -112%	15.81 -205%	8.2 -58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.41	4.03 -18%	11.28 -231%	1.4 59%
Gamma	2.05 ^107%	2.3 ^96%	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	7077 ^92%	7229 ^90%	11383 ^57%	6558 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	77	56 -27%	59 -23%	55.6 -28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	85 -15%	90 -10%	85 -15%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-107% / -63%	-90% / -74%	-139% / -53%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
7.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 5 ms subida
7.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 2.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 5 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (25.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
9.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 5.2 ms subida
9.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 4.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 5 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (40.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado

26000 Hz

≤ 25 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 26000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 25 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 26000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9813 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware 15 R3 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	150 Points ∼94% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	740 Points ∼100% +2%
Alienware 15 R3 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	737 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points ∼99% +1%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Intel Core i7-7700HQ	729 Points ∼99%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

729 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

160 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5426 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5358 Points ∼99% +2%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	5299 Points ∼98% +1%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	5270 Points ∼97%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5169 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5009 Points ∼97% +14%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	4966 Points ∼96% +13%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4406 Points ∼85%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4406 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5270 puntos
ayuda

	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Alienware 15 R3
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		146%	64%
Write 4k QD32	190.3	375.3 97%	429.8 126%
Read 4k QD32	368.8	572.9 55%	541.7 47%
Write 4k	88.91	141.9 60%	122.9 38%
Read 4k	21.77	50.76 133%	37.8 74%
Write 512	409.9	1192 191%	428.1 4%
Read 512	411.9	1078 162%	833.2 102%
Write Seq	441.4	1262 186%	429.2 -3%
Read Seq	506.6	1939 283%	1123 122%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY

Sequential Read: 506.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 441.4 MB/s

512K Read: 411.9 MB/s

512K Write: 409.9 MB/s

4K Read: 21.77 MB/s

4K Write: 88.91 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 368.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 190.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	23246 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	22810 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	21955 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	20240 Points ∼87% -13%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	17793 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	17675 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	17106 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	16165 Points ∼91% -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		16625 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		27629 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13917 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Battlefield 1 | For Honor | Ghost Recon Wildlands

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	62.2 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	59.6 fps ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ	51 fps ∼82% -18%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	102.5 fps ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ	85.9 fps ∼84% -16%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	118.8 fps ∼100%

Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	112.5 fps ∼100% +9%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	109 fps ∼97% +6%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	103.2 fps ∼92%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	123.6 fps ∼100% +12%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	121 fps ∼98% +10%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	110.5 fps ∼89%

For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	113 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	105.6 fps ∼93% -7%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	144.4 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	143.3 fps ∼99% -1%

Ghost Recon Wildlands
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	52.2 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	51.6 fps ∼99% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	90.8 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	84.1 fps ∼93% -7%

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)				62.2	fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			118.8	102.5	fps
Far Cry Primal (2016)			76	74	fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)			83.1	45.6	fps
Battlefield 1 (2016)			110.5	103.2	fps
For Honor (2017)			144.4	113	fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)			90.8	52.2	fps

Ruido

Ocioso		33 / 35 / 40 dB(A)
HDD		34 dB(A)
Carga		48 / 55 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


46 °C	47 °C	48 °C
45 °C	46 °C	44 °C
38 °C	39 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 43.2 °C


47 °C	45 °C	46 °C
42 °C	45 °C	42 °C
34 °C	39 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C

Conector de corriente 48 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


29 °C	28 °C	28 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
29 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 28.4 °C


29 °C	31 °C	31 °C
31 °C	33 °C	32 °C
31 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C

Conector de corriente 26 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


44 °C	45 °C	47 °C
42 °C	44 °C	43 °C
38 °C	39 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 42 °C


45 °C	44 °C	43 °C
43 °C	45 °C	38 °C
33 °C	37 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 40 °C

Conector de corriente 43 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-10.3 °C / -18.5 F).

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Alienware 15 R3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.5 / 0.7 Watt
Ocioso	11 / 16 / 21 Watt
Carga	92 / 224 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	Alienware 15 R3 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Power Consumption		-22%	-27%	-6%
Idle Minimum *	11	18 -64%	19 -73%	19.1 -74%
Idle Average *	16	23 -44%	23 -44%	20.8 -30%
Idle Maximum *	21	30 -43%	29 -38%	21.8 -4%
Load Average *	92	89 3%	85 8%	73.7 20%
Load Maximum *	224	213 5%	192 14%	173.1 23%
Witcher 3 ultra *	185	168 9%		130.2 30%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		5h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		3h 21min
Carga (máximo brillo)		0h 42min

	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 51 Wh	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh	Alienware 15 R3 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 99 Wh	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Duración de Batería		100%	64%	-13%
Reader / Idle	323	502 55%	382 18%	229 -29%
WiFi v1.3	201	332 65%	264 31%	147 -27%
Load	42	117 179%	102 143%	49 17%
H.264		295	266

Pro

+ relativamente compacto y liviano

+ carcasa sólida y bien hecha

+ conectividad alta

+ lector de tarjetas rápido

+ muy buen teclado

+ 120 Hz, tiempos de respuesta rápidos

+ 100% sRGB

+ buena precisión de color

+ Nvidia Optimus

Contra

- se ven las huellas dactilares en la carcasa, difíciles de limpiar

- el touchpad tiene problemas

- Panel TN con ángulos de visión inestables

- la pantalla podría ser más brillante

- sin G-Sync

- SSD no tiene interfaz PCIe

El MSI GE62VR Raider-075 - Modelo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Alemania.

MSI se ha alejado de la tendencia general de IPS y se ha atrevido a ser imperfecto. Si no requieres de mucho espacio libre alrededor de su portátil y puedes evitar mirar la pantalla desde abajo, apreciarás este portátil por sus tiempos de respuesta rápidos, color en pantalla preciso, cobertura 100% sRGB y 120 Hz, aunque esto habría tenido más sentido si MSI no hubiera quitado el G-Sync para tener un menor consumo de energía.

El MSI GE63VR Raider-075 nos dio una gran impresión durante las pruebas, solo que su decisión de renunciar a G-Sync es bastante sorprendente.

El MSI GE63VR Raider-075 está disponible desde $1700 y es un portátil gaming compacto, liviano, bien construido y de alto rendimiento con una pantalla testaruda cuyas pocas desventajas no molestarán a los jugadores ambiciosos. Podemos recomendar claramente este dispositivo.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider - 2017-10-2810/28/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado

81 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

83%

Ratón

81%

Conectividad

65 / 81 → 80%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 90%

Battería

71%

Pantalla

88%

Rendimiento de juegos

96%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

93%

Temperatura

82 / 95 → 87%

Ruido

59 / 90 → 65%

Audio

80%

Cámara

50 / 85 → 59%

Médio

76%

85%

Gaming - media ponderada

Breve análisis del portátil MSI GE63VR Raider-075 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070, Full-HD)

Size Comparison

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis

Alienware 15 R3 audio analysis

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X audio analysis

Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare