Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG Core 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)

Christian Hintze (traducido por Francisco García), 11/13/2017

Rápido, pero caliente y tragón. Schenker usa una nueva carcasa para su portátil Core 15 y no dicen de dónde la han sacado. Analizaremos si el cambio mereció la pena y qué tal queda esta pieza de 15" comparada con portátiles gaming de similar equipación.

Schenker XMG Core 15
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 387.92, No Optimus
Memoría
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual Channel, sendas ranuras ocupadas
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full-HD, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe, 250 GB 
, plus Seagate ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD @5400 rpm. conexiones: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5"
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: combinada (auriculares y micrófono), Card Reader: 6-en-1
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25.1 x 386 x 262
Battería
82 Wh, 7180 mAh Litio-Polimero, 6 celdas, no extraíble
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 2.1, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente de 200 W, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.566 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 850 g
Precio
1,588 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Left:: Power, 2x USB-A 3.0, Headset/Microphone, Status LEDs
Left:: Power, 2x USB-A 3.0, Headset/Microphone, Status LEDs
Right: SD Card Reader, USB-C 3.1, miniDP, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet, Kensington
Right: SD Card Reader, USB-C 3.1, miniDP, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet, Kensington
Back: Air Vents
Back: Air Vents
Front: Nothing
Front: Nothing
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Core 15
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.8 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG A517
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
22.7 MB/s ∼28% -72%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P55W v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG A517
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼99%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.9 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
27.2 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG A517
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
683 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼97%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79% -19%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
541 MBit/s ∼79% -19%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s ∼75% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
661 MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
618 MBit/s ∼93% +66%
Schenker XMG A517
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
616 MBit/s ∼93% +65%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼78% +38%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
470 MBit/s ∼71% +26%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
373 MBit/s ∼56%
268
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 299 cd/m² Médio: 275.6 cd/m² Minimum: 46 cd/m²
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 297 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.25 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.64 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.39
Schenker XMG Core 15
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG A517
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
LG Philips LGD0533 LP156WF6-SPK3, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
12%
28%
6%
14%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
36 (18, 18)
12%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
30%
43 (22, 21)
-5%
37 (15, 22)
9%
41 (21, 20)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (16.4, 14)
24 (12.4, 11.6)
21%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
26%
24 (12, 12)
21%
25 (5, 20)
18%
34 (21, 13)
-12%
PWM Frequency
20490 (95)
21000 (95)
2%
21000 (90)
2%
Screen
1%
-27%
-13%
4%
8%
Brightness
276
311
13%
205
-26%
275
0%
289
5%
297
8%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
92
6%
86
-1%
87
0%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.36
-20%
0.69
-130%
0.36
-20%
0.29
3%
0.31
-3%
Contrast
990
889
-10%
304
-69%
800
-19%
990
0%
1039
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.25
5.08
3%
4.7
10%
5.29
-1%
4.92
6%
4.73
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.64
4.04
13%
1.8
61%
4.5
3%
3.66
21%
2.99
36%
Gamma
2.39 100%
2.34 103%
2.23 108%
2.39 100%
2.32 103%
2.32 103%
CCT
6600 98%
7029 92%
6975 93%
6839 95%
6482 100%
6905 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
56
4%
36.2
-33%
37
-31%
54
0%
56
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
85
2%
56.6
-32%
57
-31%
82
-1%
85
2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
7% / 4%
1% / -16%
-4% / -7%
9% / 6%
1% / 5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
30.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16.4 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20.4 ms subida
↘ 20.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.5 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 20490 Hz95 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20490 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 95 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 20490 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8586 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG A517
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼97% -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼94% -5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼87% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
737 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼99% +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
722 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG A517
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
710 Points ∼96% -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
673 (min: 660) Points ∼91% -7%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG A517
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.8 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼92% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.11 Points ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG A517
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.65 Points ∼94% -6%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7795 Points ∼100%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
29210 Points ∼100%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6836 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
29210 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7795 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.11 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
72.32 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
113.67 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
722 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5332 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
5317 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5198 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5083 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼51% -49%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4626 Points ∼97%
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4187 Points ∼88% -9%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4115 Points ∼86% -11%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points ∼84% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4626 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5332 puntos
ayuda
Schenker XMG Core 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-63%
3%
-61%
-96%
Write 4k QD32
481.9
99.74
-79%
396.3
-18%
240.1
-50%
0.274
-100%
Read 4k QD32
577.2
369.9
-36%
485.4
-16%
358.5
-38%
1.133
-100%
Write 4k
134
70.91
-47%
153.5
15%
54.98
-59%
0.313
-100%
Read 4k
58.35
29.36
-50%
60.07
3%
25.4
-56%
0.473
-99%
Write 512
1006
137.8
-86%
810
-19%
254.8
-75%
84.36
-92%
Read 512
779.8
343.5
-56%
746.5
-4%
252.5
-68%
37.83
-95%
Write Seq
1188
138.2
-88%
1144
-4%
261.9
-78%
101.8
-91%
Read Seq
1338
502.5
-62%
2196
64%
466.2
-65%
120.9
-91%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Sequential Read: 1338 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1188 MB/s
512K Read: 779.8 MB/s
512K Write: 1006 MB/s
4K Read: 58.35 MB/s
4K Write: 134 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 577.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 481.9 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11633 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11494 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG A517
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11439 Points ∼98% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11426 Points ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11322 Points ∼97%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11134 Points ∼96% -2%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14942 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14732 Points ∼99% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14693 Points ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14471 Points ∼97%
Schenker XMG A517
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14399 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14233 Points ∼95% -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
12840 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26226 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9660 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 207.21131.9869.5738.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 181.07136.0571.0559.36fps
Doom (2016) 155.3146.44102.297.42fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
39.2 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.4 fps ∼98% +1%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.3 fps ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.2 fps ∼97%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
35.5 fps ∼91% -7%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
70.9 fps ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
70.4 fps ∼99% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
69.57 fps ∼98%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
68 fps ∼96% -2%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
66 fps ∼93% -5%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
61.8 fps ∼100% +4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
61.3 fps ∼99% +3%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
60.7 fps ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
59.36 fps ∼96%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
74.5 fps ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
72.6 fps ∼97% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
71.05 fps ∼95%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
97.42 fps ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
95.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
93 fps ∼95% -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
102.2 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
97 fps ∼95% -5%

Ruido

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 34 dB(A)
Carga
41 / 47 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
-7%
-2%
2%
-3%
-1%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
28.7
1%
30.3
-4%
30
-3%
30.4
-5%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
30.6
1%
31
-0%
33
-6%
30.9
-0%
Idle Average *
32
35
-9%
30.6
4%
30.9
3%
34
-6%
30.9
3%
Idle Maximum *
34
40
-18%
31
9%
31.5
7%
35
-3%
31.5
7%
Load Average *
41
43
-5%
46.2
-13%
38.7
6%
39
5%
40.7
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39
43
-10%
42
-8%
45.5
-17%
Load Maximum *
47
49
-4%
52.3
-11%
41.9
11%
50
-6%
43.9
7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 50 °C50 °C53 °C 
 51 °C50 °C45 °C 
 35 °C32 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C
54 °C59 °C43 °C
58 °C61 °C38 °C
27 °C29 °C25 °C
Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C
Conector de corriente  38 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
12%
11%
32%
25%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
53
-0%
53.2
-0%
41.6
22%
49.6
6%
51.9
2%
Maximum Bottom *
61
49
20%
56.8
7%
37
39%
47.7
22%
54.6
10%
Idle Upper Side *
35
33
6%
28.8
18%
24.9
29%
23.6
33%
29.1
17%
Idle Bottom *
39
30
23%
31.4
19%
24.3
38%
24.6
37%
29.3
25%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204345.42536.739.93129.431.84034.140.55027.2306324.829.58025.738.810025.439.812522.234.216021.644.220022.748.825022.452.531519.853.140018.350.850017.361.163017.269.580017.172.7100016.866.3125016.863.5160016.960.4200016.858.7250017.155.531501751.2400016.953500017.153.5630017.156.6800017.258.51000017.554.11250017.843.41600017.134.9SPL29.475.3N1.232.1median 17.2Schenker XMG Core 15median 53.5Delta1.95.23734.931.629.128.726.529.330.827.226.225.32625.32625.436.422.54923.547.522.457.319.963.620.566.218.868.618.266.818.369.617.67117.770.717.171.116.971.617.268.417.365.717.264.717.365.217.462.517.359.617.559.918.166.917.572.717.26829.780.21.349.2median 17.6HP Omen 15-ce002ngmedian 66.21.74.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Schenker XMG Core 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18 / 22 / 26 Watt
Carga midlight 93 / 175 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
20%
18%
36%
33%
28%
Idle Minimum *
18
8
56%
14.9
17%
8
56%
8
56%
7.2
60%
Idle Average *
22
12
45%
15.1
31%
10.9
50%
13
41%
10.5
52%
Idle Maximum *
26
25
4%
15.2
42%
11.8
55%
18
31%
16
38%
Load Average *
93
85
9%
105.8
-14%
70
25%
76
18%
82
12%
Load Maximum *
175
180
-3%
148.8
15%
148
15%
143
18%
155
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
119
110
8%
102
14%
124
-4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
5h 00min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
4h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 54min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 20min
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 82 Wh
Schenker XMG A517
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 64 Wh
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 60 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 63 Wh
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 69 Wh
Duración de Batería
28%
-0%
48%
70%
58%
Reader / Idle
300
447
49%
363
21%
707
136%
789
163%
501
67%
H.264
234
310
32%
312
33%
WiFi v1.3
282
301
7%
277
-2%
380
35%
346
23%
357
27%
Load
80
99
24%
64
-20%
71
-11%
98
23%
144
80%

Pro

+ acabado de goma con agarre
+ bandeja trasera fácil de sacar
+ buenos dispositivos de entrada
+ decente display IPS
+ SSD buenísimo
+ alto rendimiento de sistema
+ relativamente quedo

Contra

- sin Thunderbolt 3
- demasiado spuertos juntos en el lado derecho
- latencia/caídas
- extrema ralentización en batería
- altas temperaturas
- alto uso de energía
- mal aguante de batería
Schenker XMG Core 15, cortesía de Schenker Technologies.
Schenker XMG Core 15, cortesía de Schenker Technologies.

El portátil gaming realmente bueno Schenker XMG Core 15 se estaba quedando sin gas al final de nuestras pruebas.

El Core 15 puntúa con un display bastante decente, componentes de fácil acceso, buena configurabilidad, y sobre todo, un rendimiento buenísimo.

Por otro lado, el dispositivo sufre mala disipación de calor, alto consumo de energía, un aguante de batería algo bajo, y le falta optimización de drivers (palabra clave: latencia). El nuevo chasis parece más un descenso que un ascenso en disipación de calor, aunque por lo demás es bastante agradable y sobre todo más quedo que el XMG A517. La falta de Thunderbolt 3 y puertos USB 3.1 de segunda generación también es algo molesta.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Schenker XMG Core 15 - 11/07/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Acabado
74 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
83%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
60 / 81 → 73%
Peso
59 / 66 → 88%
Battería
76%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
93%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
96%
Temperatura
78 / 95 → 82%
Ruido
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
60%
Médio
77%
84%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG Core 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
Christian Hintze, 2017-11-13 (Update: 2017-11-13)