Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Asus FX502VM-AS73

Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 03/06/2017

Gaming sin extras. El FX502VM ofrece casi todo lo que viene con la GL502VM sin impactar mucho en el rendimiento. Sin embargo, debería evitarse la configuración con el display TN de gama más baja debido a su poco contraste.

Asus FX502VM-AS73 (FX Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 3072 MB, Núcleo: 1404 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 373.19
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 8 GB gelötet, 8 GB SODIMM, dual-channel, 17-17-17-39
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, TN LED, ID: BOE069C, Name: BOE NT156FHM-N41, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB 
, Sekundäre: Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: 3.5mm-Audiokombo, Card Reader: SD Speicherkartenleser
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 23 x 390 x 266
Battería
64 Wh Litio-Polimero, 4-Zell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, MyAsus, Asus Giftbox, McAfee, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.57 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 660 g
Precio
1250 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

390 mm 266 mm 40 mm 2.9 kg389 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.5 kg380 mm 269 mm 34 mm 2.6 kg390 mm 266 mm 24 mm 2.5 kg390 mm 266 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, mDP, HDMI, USB 3.0
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, mDP, HDMI, USB 3.0
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
331 MBit/s ∼49% -39%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
560 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼92%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
468 MBit/s ∼84% -9%
206.8
cd/m²
206.5
cd/m²
203.4
cd/m²
200.3
cd/m²
209.5
cd/m²
207.6
cd/m²
196.2
cd/m²
214.2
cd/m²
200.5
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 214.2 cd/m² Médio: 205 cd/m² Minimum: 22.01 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 209.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 304:1 (Negro: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
56.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Asus FX502VM-AS73
TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware 15 R3
HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
29%
-21%
-112%
-21%
-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
25 (12, 13)
12%
37 (16, 21)
-30%
54 (33.2, 20)
-90%
37 (15, 22)
-30%
42 (19.2, 22.8)
-48%
Response Time Black / White *
22.4 (6, 16.4)
12 (4, 8)
46%
25 (4, 21)
-12%
52.4 (33.2, 19.2)
-134%
25 (5, 20)
-12%
32.8 (6, 26.8)
-46%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-6%
41%
54%
39%
44%
Brightness middle
209.5
386
84%
310
48%
400
91%
287
37%
307.8
47%
Brightness
205
382
86%
311
52%
392
91%
289
41%
301
47%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
85
-8%
89
-3%
87
-5%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.69
0.39
43%
0.3
57%
0.26
62%
0.29
58%
0.33
52%
Contrast
304
990
226%
1033
240%
1538
406%
990
226%
933
207%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
10.2
-117%
4.82
-3%
4.9
-4%
4.92
-5%
4.5
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.7
15.81
20%
10.14
49%
11
44%
11
44%
10
49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
11.28
-527%
3.94
-119%
7.2
-300%
3.66
-103%
2.9
-61%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.45 90%
2.11 104%
2.32 95%
2.22 99%
CCT
6975 93%
11383 57%
6877 95%
6911 94%
6482 100%
1136 572%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.2
59
63%
54
49%
64.2
77%
54
49%
55.4
53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56.6
90
59%
83
47%
98.9
75%
82
45%
84.8
50%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
12% / -0%
10% / 31%
-29% / 26%
9% / 29%
-2% / 29%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
22.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 16.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 28 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (25.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
28.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 11.2 ms subida
↘ 17.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 15 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (40.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9566 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points ∼84% +31%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼73% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
154 Points ∼71% +10%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
146 Points ∼67% +4%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼66% +3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼64%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼60% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
899 Points ∼21% +24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼20% +21%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼17%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points ∼16% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
704 Points ∼16% -3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼15% -7%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points ∼13% -22%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
508 Points ∼12% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼85% +25%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼70% +3%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points ∼69% +1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼68%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼64% -7%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼61% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.91 Points ∼37% +24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼32% +7%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼30%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points ∼29% 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼27% -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points ∼22% -25%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points ∼50% +14%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5660 Points ∼44%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
5580 Points ∼43% -1%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points ∼43% -2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4720 Points ∼37% -17%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points ∼48% +11%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points ∼44% +1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21376 Points ∼43%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
21079 Points ∼42% -1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
19720 Points ∼40% -8%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
241 s * ∼3% -12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
214.337 s * ∼3%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.294 s * ∼2% +4%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% +4%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
581 Seconds * ∼3% -5%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
573.691 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
552.594 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% +12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10685
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21376
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5660
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.83 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.87 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
725 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5447 Points ∼84% +100%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5406 Points ∼83% +99%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
5317 Points ∼82% +95%
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5299 Points ∼81% +95%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
4884 Points ∼75% +79%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼42%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
7738 Points ∼81% +7%
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7678 Points ∼81% +6%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
7332 Points ∼77% +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
7220 Points ∼76%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5011 Points ∼82% +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4967 Points ∼82% +4%
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4966 Points ∼82% +4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼78%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points ∼66% -16%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
3659 Points ∼60% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4765 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7220 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2722 puntos
ayuda
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Alienware 15 R3
 
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
146%
-75%
31%
351%
Write 4k QD32
99.74
429.8
331%
1.057
-99%
240.1
141%
542.1
444%
Read 4k QD32
369.9
541.7
46%
69.75
-81%
358.5
-3%
651.6
76%
Write 4k
70.91
122.9
73%
1.021
-99%
54.98
-22%
152.4
115%
Read 4k
29.36
37.8
29%
10.84
-63%
25.4
-13%
56.81
93%
Write 512
137.8
428.1
211%
42.51
-69%
254.8
85%
1115
709%
Read 512
343.5
833.2
143%
101.7
-70%
252.5
-26%
862.9
151%
Write Seq
138.2
429.2
211%
74.17
-46%
261.9
90%
1477
969%
Read Seq
502.5
1123
123%
123
-76%
466.2
-7%
1747
248%
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Sequential Read: 502.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 138.2 MB/s
512K Read: 343.5 MB/s
512K Write: 137.8 MB/s
4K Read: 29.36 MB/s
4K Write: 70.91 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 369.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 99.74 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
5046 Points ∼50% +97%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4005 Points ∼40% +56%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points ∼29% +13%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2565 Points ∼25%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2534 Points ∼25% -1%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10451 Points ∼53% +91%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8236 Points ∼41% +51%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5463 Points ∼27%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5369 Points ∼27% -2%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2694 Points ∼14% -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
22566 Points ∼56% +94%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
17170 Points ∼42% +48%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% +12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11633 Points ∼29%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11186 Points ∼28% -4%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
8086 Points ∼20% -30%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5961 Points ∼15% -49%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼49% +24%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
11082 Points ∼49% +24%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
9116 Points ∼40% +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8967 Points ∼40%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8583 Points ∼38% -4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7440 Points ∼33% -17%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
7216 Points ∼32% -20%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
28595 Points ∼56% +94%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
23243 Points ∼46% +58%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% +18%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14732 Points ∼29%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14347 Points ∼28% -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
10186 Points ∼20% -31%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7649 Points ∼15% -48%
3DMark 11 Performance
12736 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
125692 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25979 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9845 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5189 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
164.7 fps ∼100% +60%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
130 fps ∼79% +26%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
103.1 fps ∼63%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps ∼52% -16%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
66.2 fps ∼40% -36%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
130 fps ∼100% +64%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
79.3 fps ∼61%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
140.6 fps ∼100% +81%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
116.3 fps ∼83% +50%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
77.5 fps ∼55%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.5 fps ∼41% -26%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
125 fps ∼100% +62%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
77.3 fps ∼62%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps ∼47% -24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
43.6 fps ∼35% -44%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
124 fps ∼100% +68%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
77.1 fps ∼62% +5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
73.7 fps ∼59%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps ∼47% -21%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
46.2 fps ∼37% -37%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
118 fps ∼100% +92%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.9 fps ∼57% +9%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.5 fps ∼56% +8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
61.3 fps ∼52%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps ∼47% -10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
39.7 fps ∼34% -35%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
33.7 fps ∼29% -45%
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
54.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
29.1 fps ∼53% -47%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
153 fps ∼100% +61%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
99.7 fps ∼65% +5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
95.1 fps ∼62%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
63.8 fps ∼42% -33%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps ∼37% -41%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
116 fps ∼100% +8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
107.3 fps ∼93%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
87.3 fps ∼75% -19%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
71 (min: 59, max: 85) fps ∼61% -34%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
56 (min: 48, max: 65) fps ∼48% -48%
Mafia 3 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
46.7 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
28.7 fps ∼61% -39%
bajo medio alto ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 77.5fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 103.1fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 79.3fps
Thief (2014) 77.3fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 73.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 61.3fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 54.8fps
Doom (2016) 95.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 107.3fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 46.7fps

Ruido

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 31 dB(A)
Carga
46.2 / 52.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.7 dB(A)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Noise
-8%
-2%
-3%
-4%
off / environment *
28.7
30
-5%
30.3
-6%
30
-5%
30.8
-7%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
31
-1%
31.6
-3%
33
-8%
32
-5%
Idle Average *
30.6
32
-5%
31.6
-3%
34
-11%
32
-5%
Idle Maximum *
31
42
-35%
33.4
-8%
35
-13%
32
-3%
Load Average *
46.2
49
-6%
47.8
-3%
39
16%
48.3
-5%
Load Maximum *
52.3
50
4%
47.8
9%
50
4%
51.2
2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 39.8 °C53.2 °C38.8 °C 
 27.2 °C43.6 °C25.4 °C 
 21.6 °C22 °C22.2 °C 
Máximo: 53.2 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C
50.2 °C56.8 °C47 °C
25.8 °C40.4 °C23.4 °C
23.4 °C23 °C23 °C
Máximo: 56.8 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
Conector de corriente  44 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 41.9 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.4 °C / 74.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+5.3 °C / 9.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.734.92535.632.13132.835.64030.632.55033.632.86331.931.28030.430.61003130.512531.730.716028.230.520027.236.825026.148.631525.35140025.35250025.149.363024.454.180025.360.1100024.357.2125023.953160024.154.7200023.352.1250023.154.9315023.155.740002357.250002358.8630023.158.6800023.251.41000023.243.31250023.142.31600023.238.3SPL35.967.8N2.623median 24.1median 52Delta1.86.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus FX502VM-AS73Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Asus FX502VM-AS73 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.74 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14.9 / 15.1 / 15.2 Watt
Carga midlight 105.8 / 148.8 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus FX502VM-AS73Alienware 15 R3Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)Gigabyte P55W v7Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
Power Consumption
-36%
33%
15%
-102%
Idle Minimum *
14.9
19
-28%
6.6
56%
8
46%
38.3
-157%
Idle Average *
15.1
23
-52%
9
40%
13
14%
40.5
-168%
Idle Maximum *
15.2
29
-91%
10.7
30%
18
-18%
42.2
-178%
Load Average *
105.8
85
20%
77.5
27%
76
28%
110.4
-4%
Load Maximum *
148.8
192
-29%
130
13%
143
4%
155.7
-5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
6h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 37min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 04min
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Alienware 15 R3
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 56 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 63 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Duración de Batería
20%
36%
65%
-50%
Reader / Idle
363
382
5%
565
56%
789
117%
104
-71%
WiFi v1.3
277
264
-5%
334
21%
346
25%
88
-68%
Load
64
102
59%
84
31%
98
53%
57
-11%

Pro

+ entrañas accesibles; 2 bahías de almacenamiento, 1x SODIMM
+ relativamente delgado y pequeño para un portátil gaming
+ rendimiento potente; sin ralentización importante
+ teclas quedas

Contra

- terrible display TN; sin opciones 120 Hz/5 ms
- ventiladores relativamente ruidosos; siempre activos
- GTX 1060 3 GB en vez de GTX 1060 6 GB
- clickpad de firmeza mejorable
- tapa de firmeza mejorable
- sin USB Type-C
Asus ROG FX502VM-AS73. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de CUKUSA.com
Asus ROG FX502VM-AS73. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de CUKUSA.com

El FX502VM cuesta unos cientos de dólares menos que el GL502VM incluso suponiendo configuraciones de CPU y almacenamiento idénticas. Por supuesto, sacrifica cosas por el camino, incluyendo la falta de puerto USB Type-C y una GTX 1060 con la mitad de VRAM. El sistema sigue siendo una máquina gaming muy equilibrada incluso después de tener en cuenta los recortes ya que estos defectos casi no tienen efecto tangible jugando a 1080p. Más allá de esto, los pros y contras del GL502VM siguen siendo válidos, incluyendo el fuerte ruido de ventilación, la tapaflexibole, y la falta de Thunderbolt 3. El GL502VM ya era un portáitl gaming muy bueno y el FX502VM es meramente un diminuto paso atrás para tener un precio más asequible. El chasis es notablemente más delgado que el de las series MSI GE/GL y es más atractivo que la serie HP Omen al tiempo que es más asequible que la línea Gigabyte actual.

Si bien podemos dar una sólida recomendación al sistema actual para los gamers con presupuesto ajustado, los compradores deberían evitar por completo las configuraciones con el modelo TN como el que tenemos aquí e inviertan en opciones IPS de más calidad. El panel TN no tiene cabida en esta categoría, ya que su brillo, colores, y contraste son malos incluso para los estándares de portátiles económicos, no hablemos ya de máquinas gaming de $1000. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus FX502VM-AS73 - 03/04/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabado
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
84%
Ratón
78%
Conectividad
58 / 81 → 71%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Battería
79%
Pantalla
74%
Rendimiento de juegos
92%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
87%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 92%
Ruido
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
70%
Cámara
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Asus FX502VM-AS73
Allen Ngo, 2017-03- 6 (Update: 2017-03-16)