Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST (E2-9000, HD )

Portátil de oficina simple. El nuevo Lenovo IdeaPad es un portátil de 17,3" que funciona silenciosamente y apenas se calienta. Estas características están acompañadas por una gran cantidad de almacenamiento disponible y un teclado decente. La pantalla, sin embargo, no es particularmente emocionante.
Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Francisco García),
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE (IdeaPad 320 Serie)
Procesador
AMD E2-9000 2 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Stoney Ridge
Adaptador gráfico
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), Núcleo: 200-600 MHz, Mono canal, 22.19.662.4 (Crimson 17.7.2)
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, mono canal,una ranura (ocupada)
pantalla
17.3 pulgadas 16:9, 1600 x 900 pixels 106 PPI, AU Optronics B173RTN02.1, LED TN , lustroso: no
Placa base
AMD CZ FCH
Disco duro
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB 
, 870 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: audio combinado, TPM 2.0, AMD PSP 2.0
Equipamento de red
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24.9 x 418 x 292.6
Battería
30 Wh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: SD
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, MS Office Home and Student 2016 (Demo), 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.8 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 171 g
Precio
459 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

423.3 mm 289.9 mm 27.9 mm 3 kg418 mm 292.6 mm 24.9 mm 2.8 kg417 mm 279 mm 24.9 mm 2.6 kg417 mm 279 mm 24.9 mm 2.7 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼100%
HP 17-y044ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼95% -5%
HP 17-x066ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.2 MB/s ∼79% -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP 17-y044ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.6 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34.7 MB/s ∼90%
HP 17-x066ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.4 MB/s ∼76% -15%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
288 MBit/s ∼100%
HP 17-x066ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
96 MBit/s ∼33% -67%
HP 17-y044ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)
47 MBit/s ∼16% -84%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
353 MBit/s ∼100%
HP 17-x066ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
93 MBit/s ∼26% -74%
HP 17-y044ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)
51 MBit/s ∼14% -86%
223
cd/m²
207
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
194
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
191
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics B173RTN02.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 236 cd/m² Médio: 209.1 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 232 cd/m²
Contraste: 373:1 (Negro: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.26 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 13.85 | 0.64-98 Ø6
73% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3
HP 17-x066ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP 17-y044ng
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3
Acer Aspire ES1-731-P4A6
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3
Response Times
-13%
-12%
-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (22, 18)
38 (21, 17)
5%
43 (21, 22, Plateau)
-8%
41 (22, 19)
-3%
Response Time Black / White *
20 (16, 4)
26 (15, 11)
-30%
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
-15%
28 (9, 19)
-40%
PWM Frequency
199 (10)
Screen
54%
7%
25%
Brightness middle
205
331
61%
264
29%
219
7%
Brightness
209
310
48%
232
11%
224
7%
Brightness Distribution
81
87
7%
80
-1%
91
12%
Black Level *
0.55
0.33
40%
0.59
-7%
0.31
44%
Contrast
373
1003
169%
447
20%
706
89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11.26
4.58
59%
10.58
6%
9.31
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.86
7.83
61%
18.96
5%
13.74
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.85
6.18
55%
13.13
5%
10.87
22%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.34 94%
2.49 88%
2.9 76%
CCT
15307 42%
6076 107%
14044 46%
11513 56%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
47
56
19%
48
2%
52
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
73
86
18%
74
1%
80
10%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
21% / 43%
-3% / 4%
2% / 17%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9584 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
20 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16 ms subida
↘ 4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 25 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (24.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (38.7 ms).
0102030405060708090Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3471
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2897
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1787
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
15.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.01 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.59 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
15.74 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
84 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
47 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼57% +177%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
70 Points ∼30% +49%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel Core i3-6006U
70 Points ∼30% +49%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼23% +13%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼23% +13%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
51 Points ∼22% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
47 Points ∼20%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
45 Points ∼20% -4%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
42 Points ∼18% -11%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
40 Points ∼17% -15%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
Intel Pentium N3700
39 Points ∼17% -17%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
37 Points ∼16% -21%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points ∼16% -21%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
33 Points ∼14% -30%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
25 Points ∼11% -47%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼8% +293%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel Core i3-6006U
208 Points ∼5% +148%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
195 Points ∼4% +132%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
175 Points ∼4% +108%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
167 Points ∼4% +99%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼4% +96%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
159 Points ∼4% +89%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
151 Points ∼3% +80%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
150 Points ∼3% +79%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
Intel Pentium N3700
143 Points ∼3% +70%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
140 Points ∼3% +67%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
84 Points ∼2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points ∼2% -19%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
61 Points ∼1% -27%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
49 Points ∼1% -42%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
11401 Points ∼17% +294%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
5913 Points ∼9% +104%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
5776 Points ∼9% +99%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
5440 Points ∼8% +88%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
5149 Points ∼8% +78%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
4974 Points ∼8% +72%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
4673 Points ∼7% +61%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
4649 Points ∼7% +60%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
4454 Points ∼7% +54%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
Intel Pentium N3700
3064 Points ∼5% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
2897 Points ∼4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points ∼3% -22%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1978 Points ∼3% -32%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
1948 Points ∼3% -33%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
5004 Points ∼46% +180%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
2340 Points ∼22% +31%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
1840 Points ∼17% +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
1787 Points ∼16%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
1680 Points ∼16% -6%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1675 Points ∼15% -6%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1638 Points ∼15% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
1429 Points ∼13% -20%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
1340 Points ∼12% -25%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
1238 Points ∼11% -31%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1216 Points ∼11% -32%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
Intel Pentium N3700
1205 Points ∼11% -33%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
1028 Points ∼9% -42%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1019 Points ∼9% -43%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
6923 Points ∼9% +198%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
5252 Points ∼6% +126%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4736 Points ∼6% +104%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
4682 Points ∼6% +102%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4563 Points ∼6% +96%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
3553 Points ∼4% +53%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
3253 Points ∼4% +40%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
3190 Points ∼4% +37%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
2323 Points ∼3%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1583 Points ∼2% -32%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
1324 Points ∼2% -43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
3209 Points ∼66% +124%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
2000 Points ∼41% +40%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
1430 Points ∼29% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
1430 Points ∼29%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1400 Points ∼29% -2%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1395 Points ∼29% -2%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
1023 Points ∼21% -28%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
1012 Points ∼21% -29%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
977 Points ∼20% -32%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
865 Points ∼18% -40%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
760 Points ∼16% -47%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
7421 Points ∼18% +213%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
4711 Points ∼11% +99%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4558 Points ∼11% +92%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
4491 Points ∼11% +89%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4364 Points ∼11% +84%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
2371 Points ∼6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
3902 Points ∼60% +153%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
2047 Points ∼32% +33%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
1609 Points ∼25% +4%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1581 Points ∼24% +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
1543 Points ∼24%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1541 Points ∼24% 0%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
4729 Points ∼8% +92%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4719 Points ∼8% +92%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
2461 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
1616 Points ∼24% +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
1591 Points ∼24%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1571 Points ∼23% -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
216.9 Points ∼58% +162%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD A10-9600P
123.3 Points ∼33% +49%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel Pentium N4200
91.527 Points ∼24% +11%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
90.06 Points ∼24% +9%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
87.494 Points ∼23% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD E2-9000
82.762 Points ∼22%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
65.041 Points ∼17% -21%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
58.54 Points ∼16% -29%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD E2-7110
52.214 Points ∼14% -37%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
51.115 Points ∼14% -38%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD E1-6010
38.1 Points ∼10% -54%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
36.78 Points ∼10% -56%
PCMark 7 Score
2185 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1844 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2119 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3225 puntos
PCMark 10 Score
1385 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP 17-x066ng
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5
2801 Points ∼46% +52%
HP 17-y044ng
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), A10-9600P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0
2754 Points ∼45% +49%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1844 Points ∼30%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
GeForce 910M, N3700, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1741 Points ∼29% -6%
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 31.5 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 139.2 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 103.3 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso: 19.7 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas: 148 MB/s
Uso de CPU: 5.8 %
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
HP 17-x066ng
WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5
HP 17-y044ng
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
86%
83%
74%
Write 4k QD32
0.154
0.959
523%
1.03
569%
1
549%
Read 4k QD32
1.088
1.039
-5%
0.891
-18%
0.892
-18%
Write 4k
0.316
0.96
204%
1.013
221%
0.755
139%
Read 4k
0.448
0.395
-12%
0.328
-27%
0.324
-28%
Write 512
92.19
45.98
-50%
28.27
-69%
25.77
-72%
Read 512
30.3
33.8
12%
19.17
-37%
32.89
9%
Write Seq
87.01
98.24
13%
102
17%
96.03
10%
Read Seq
98.62
98.55
0%
105.5
7%
105
6%
3DMark 05 Standard
6853 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard
3809 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
2136 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
788 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
26099 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2187 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
477 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1735 Points ∼3% +132%
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1535 Points ∼3% +105%
HP 17-y044ng
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A10-9600P
1482 Points ∼3% +98%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
1413 Points ∼2% +89%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U
1177 Points ∼2% +58%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
825 Points ∼1% +10%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A6-7310
764 Points ∼1% +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), AMD E2-9000
747 Points ∼1%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points ∼1% -16%
Acer Aspire E5-722-2611
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD E2-7110
623 Points ∼1% -17%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
616 Points ∼1% -18%
Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD E1-6010
397 Points ∼1% -47%
bajo medio alto ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 65.2 33.2 fps
Dirt 3 (2011) 55.7 28.1 22.1 fps
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) 41 20.3 fps
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 24.7 16.3 10.8 fps
Anno 2070 (2011) 48.8 22.3 13.9 fps
Diablo III (2012) 28.5 17.8 15.9 fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 26.9 21.7 20 fps
Dead Space 3 (2013) 43.5 20.8 16.5 fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 35.7 15.7 11.1 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 36.8 18.1 14.2 fps
GRID 2 (2013) 39.5 20.7 12.6 fps
GRID: Autosport (2014) 46 16.9 fps
Sims 4 (2014) 82.1 20.7 fps
F1 2014 (2014) 28 18 fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 23.6 18.5 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 28.7 18.4 fps
World of Warships (2015) 25.5 20.3 fps
Overwatch (2016) 17.5 15 fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 43.5 26.4 fps
Prey (2017) 9.4 fps
Rocket League (2017) 30.8 fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 19.7 18.5 fps

Ruido

Ocioso
31 / 31 / 31 dB(A)
HDD
32.1 dB(A)
DVD
34.8 / dB(A)
Carga
22.6 / 32.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.834.634.535.534.82533.732.839.938.633.73139.839.540.648.239.84032.434.835.935.632.45031.633.935.53431.66330.632.629.432.230.68027.629.627.128.227.610025.927.426.42725.912525.826.325.524.325.816023.923.823.323.223.920023.223.523.322.823.22502323.322.322.32331523.523.121.521.523.540022.121.620.620.222.150020.520.419.819.220.563022.122.51918.922.18002422.219.618.424100023.822.520.517.923.812502120.618.21821160020.620.618.217.620.6200019.419.218.417.519.4250018.918.718.217.918.9315018.818.918.41818.8400018.418.418.318.218.4500018.518.418.518.518.5630018.618.618.518.618.6800018.718.718.718.818.71000018.91918.818.718.91250018.918.918.918.918.91600019.119.119.119.119.1SPL32.632.231.130.732.6N1.81.71.51.51.8median 20.6median 20.6median 19median 18.8median 20.6Delta2.22.11.51.82.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
Carga Máx.
 27.6 °C28.2 °C24.1 °C 
 29.1 °C29.6 °C24 °C 
 27.1 °C26 °C27.9 °C 
Máximo: 29.6 °C
Médio: 27.1 °C
23.3 °C28.6 °C29.8 °C
23.4 °C29.4 °C33.4 °C
28.6 °C28.5 °C27.3 °C
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 28 °C
Conector de corriente  39.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.335.538.32539.438.639.43144.648.244.64038.135.638.15033.73433.76331.232.231.28030.528.230.510027.92727.912527.424.327.416030.923.230.920037.122.837.125052.922.352.931561.221.561.240062.620.262.650059.319.259.363063.918.963.98006018.460100057.317.957.3125062.71862.7160059.217.659.2200063.317.563.325006717.967315066.91866.9400064.918.264.9500068.918.568.9630062.418.662.4800058.918.858.91000055.118.755.11250060.918.960.91600062.219.162.2SPL76.230.776.2N37.11.537.1median 60.9median 18.8median 60.9Delta6.61.86.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.35 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.7 / 7.8 / 8 Watt
Carga midlight 19.7 / 19.6 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40)
3h 44min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP 17-x066ng
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.5 Wh
375 min ∼14% +67%
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh
302 min ∼11% +35%
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
N3700, GeForce 910M, 38 Wh
283 min ∼11% +26%
HP 17-y044ng
A10-9600P, Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh
263 min ∼10% +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
E2-9000, Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), 30 Wh
224 min ∼8%

Pro

+ Pantalla mate
+ Funciona en silencio
+ Apenas se calienta
+ Wi-Fi AC

Contra

- Solo Fast Ethernet
- Sin Type-C-USB
- Sin escotilla de mantenimiento
El Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17IKB 80XW0013GE, Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de
El Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17IKB 80XW0013GE, Modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

El Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST es un portátil de oficina de 17.3" para su escritorio en casa. La APU que contiene es adecuada para aplicaciones simples de oficina e Internet. Los posibles compradores deben ser conscientes de que la APU alcanza rápidamente sus límites. Por ejemplo, cuando varios sitios web están abiertos simultáneamente en el navegador.

El portátil apenas se calienta y es muy silencioso incluso bajo carga. No le faltará espacio de almacenamiento gracias al disco duro de 1 TB, que también podría intercambiarse por una SSD. Sin embargo, para hacerlo, habría que abrir el dispositivo, y no tiene escotilla de mantenimiento. El teclado nos dio una buena impresión y es adecuado para mecanografiar con regularidad. La pantalla mate de 17.3" no nos pudo convencer: es oscura, tiene poco contraste y tiene malos ángulos de visión.  

El principal problema del IdeaPad 320-17AST es su precio.


En Europa, nuestro dispositivo está disponible por alrededor de 460 Euros, y es un precio bastante alto para un dispositivo de tan baja potencia. Si está interesado en un IdeaPad, le recomendamos que piense en otro modelo.


El modelo 80XW0018GE puede ser una buena opción, por ejemplo, ya que está equipado con la APU A9-9420 que es más fuerte. El dispositivo también está disponible por aproximadamente 460 Euros, pero no está equipado con un sistema operativo Windows. Sin embargo, se puede comprar una licencia usada de Windows 7 o Windows 8.1 por entre $ 5 y $ 10, con la cual puede instalar fácilmente Windows 10.


 Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST (E2-9000, HD+) Laptop Reviewaquí


 

 

Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE - 10/10/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
77 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
76%
Ratón
88%
Conectividad
40 / 80 → 50%
Peso
58 / 20-67 → 80%
Battería
73%
Pantalla
74%
Rendimiento de juegos
49 / 68 → 72%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
48 / 92 → 52%
Temperatura
95%
Ruido
94%
Audio
50%
Cámara
25 / 85 → 29%
Médio
65%
75%
Office - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST (E2-9000, HD )
Sascha Mölck, 2017-10-14 (Update: 2017-10-14)