Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST (E2-9000, HD )
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-y044ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-x066ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP 17-y044ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-x066ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP 17-y044ng (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP 17-y044ng (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 232 cd/m²
Contraste: 373:1 (Negro: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.85 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
50.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30 | HP 17-x066ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP 17-y044ng TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30 | Acer Aspire ES1-731-P4A6 TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 22% | 1% | 10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 50.5 | 63.6 26% | 50.9 1% | 55.4 10% |
| sRGB Coverage | 73.3 | 86.5 18% | 73.8 1% | 80.1 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 52.1 | 63.3 21% | 52.6 1% | 57.3 10% |
| Response Times | -13% | -12% | -22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 38 ? 5% | 43 ? -8% | 41 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 26 ? -30% | 23 ? -15% | 28 ? -40% |
| PWM Frequency | 199 ? | |||
| Screen | 54% | 7% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 205 | 331 61% | 264 29% | 219 7% |
| Brightness | 209 | 310 48% | 232 11% | 224 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 87 7% | 80 -1% | 91 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.33 40% | 0.59 -7% | 0.31 44% |
| Contrast | 373 | 1003 169% | 447 20% | 706 89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.26 | 4.58 59% | 10.58 6% | 9.31 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.86 | 7.83 61% | 18.96 5% | 13.74 31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.85 | 6.18 55% | 13.13 5% | 10.87 22% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.34 94% | 2.49 88% | 2.9 76% |
| CCT | 15307 42% | 6076 107% | 14044 46% | 11513 56% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 56 19% | 48 2% | 52 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 73 | 86 18% | 74 1% | 80 10% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 21% /
38% | -1% /
3% | 4% /
16% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17903 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 37 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 56 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2185 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1844 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2119 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3225 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 1385 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP 17-x066ng WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | HP 17-y044ng WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 | Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 86% | 83% | 74% | |
| Read Seq | 98.6 | 98.6 0% | 105.5 7% | 105 6% |
| Write Seq | 87 | 98.2 13% | 102 17% | 96 10% |
| Read 512 | 30.3 | 33.8 12% | 19.17 -37% | 32.89 9% |
| Write 512 | 92.2 | 45.98 -50% | 28.27 -69% | 25.77 -72% |
| Read 4k | 0.448 | 0.395 -12% | 0.328 -27% | 0.324 -28% |
| Write 4k | 0.316 | 0.96 204% | 1.013 221% | 0.755 139% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.088 | 1.039 -5% | 0.891 -18% | 0.892 -18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.154 | 0.959 523% | 1.03 569% | 1 549% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 6853 puntos | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3809 puntos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 2136 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 788 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 26099 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2187 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 477 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-722-662J | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| Acer Aspire E5-722-2611 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Lenovo G70-35 80Q5000BGE | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
| World of Warcraft (2005) | 65.2 | 33.2 | ||
| Dirt 3 (2011) | 55.7 | 28.1 | 22.1 | |
| Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 41 | 20.3 | ||
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 24.7 | 16.3 | 10.8 | |
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 48.8 | 22.3 | 13.9 | |
| Diablo III (2012) | 28.5 | 17.8 | 15.9 | |
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 26.9 | 21.7 | 20 | |
| Dead Space 3 (2013) | 43.5 | 20.8 | 16.5 | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 35.7 | 15.7 | 11.1 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 36.8 | 18.1 | 14.2 | |
| GRID 2 (2013) | 39.5 | 20.7 | 12.6 | |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 46 | 16.9 | ||
| Sims 4 (2014) | 82.1 | 20.7 | ||
| F1 2014 (2014) | 28 | 18 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 23.6 | 18.5 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 28.7 | 18.4 | ||
| World of Warships (2015) | 25.5 | 20.3 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 17.5 | 15 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 43.5 | 26.4 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 9.4 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 30.8 | |||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 19.7 | 18.5 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 31 / 31 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 32.1 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 34.8 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 22.6 / 32.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.35 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.7 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
19.7 / 19.6 Watt |
   
| |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
Pro
Contra
El Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST es un portátil de oficina de 17.3" para su escritorio en casa. La APU que contiene es adecuada para aplicaciones simples de oficina e Internet. Los posibles compradores deben ser conscientes de que la APU alcanza rápidamente sus límites. Por ejemplo, cuando varios sitios web están abiertos simultáneamente en el navegador.
El portátil apenas se calienta y es muy silencioso incluso bajo carga. No le faltará espacio de almacenamiento gracias al disco duro de 1 TB, que también podría intercambiarse por una SSD. Sin embargo, para hacerlo, habría que abrir el dispositivo, y no tiene escotilla de mantenimiento. El teclado nos dio una buena impresión y es adecuado para mecanografiar con regularidad. La pantalla mate de 17.3" no nos pudo convencer: es oscura, tiene poco contraste y tiene malos ángulos de visión.
El principal problema del IdeaPad 320-17AST es su precio.
En Europa, nuestro dispositivo está disponible por alrededor de 460 Euros, y es un precio bastante alto para un dispositivo de tan baja potencia. Si está interesado en un IdeaPad, le recomendamos que piense en otro modelo.
El modelo 80XW0018GE puede ser una buena opción, por ejemplo, ya que está equipado con la APU A9-9420 que es más fuerte. El dispositivo también está disponible por aproximadamente 460 Euros, pero no está equipado con un sistema operativo Windows. Sin embargo, se puede comprar una licencia usada de Windows 7 o Windows 8.1 por entre $ 5 y $ 10, con la cual puede instalar fácilmente Windows 10.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST (E2-9000, HD+) Laptop Reviewaquí.
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
-
10/10/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck