Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Smartphone Bluboo S8

1/6 del precio, 1/6 del rendimiento. Bluboo capitaliza la locura del Galaxy S8 con su propia versión de imitación por $150 USD. El Bluboo S8 habría sido bastante impresionante si no fuera por algunos fallos profundos.
Bluboo S8 (S Serie)
Procesador
Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoría
3 GB 
pantalla
5.70 pulgadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels 282 PPI, capacitiva, SHARP, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Conexiones
Audio Conexiones: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (compartida de hasta 256GB), Sensores: Sensor G, sensor de proximidad, sensor de luz ambiental, sensor geomagnético, USB tipo C
Equipamento de red
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA 900/2100MHz (B8/B1), FDD LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (B20/B8/B3/B1/B7), Dual SIM, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.4 x 149.5 x 70.6
Battería
3450 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (SW:16.0MP) AF+3MP, Dual Rear Flash LED Light
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (SW:8.0 MP)
Características adicionales
Teclado: Virtual
Peso
200 g
Precio
200 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

158.7 mm 77.7 mm 8.95 mm 170 g153.6 mm 76.4 mm 8.4 mm 165 g152.5 mm 74.8 mm 8 mm 181 g149.5 mm 70.6 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148.9 mm 68.1 mm 8 mm 155 g142.6 mm 69.3 mm 8.1 mm 149 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
651 MBit/s +1300%
Huawei Y7
802.11 b/g/n
50.6 MBit/s +9%
Bluboo S8
802.11a/b/g/n
46.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 MBit/s +891%
Huawei Y7
802.11 b/g/n
52.4 MBit/s +58%
Bluboo S8
802.11a/b/g/n
33.2 MBit/s
522
cd/m²
546.2
cd/m²
547.9
cd/m²
531.2
cd/m²
544.2
cd/m²
542.8
cd/m²
533.9
cd/m²
543.9
cd/m²
538.1
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
SHARP tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 547.9 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 538.9 cd/m² Minimum: 21.81 cd/m²
iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 544.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 812:1 (Negro: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.01
Bluboo S8
SHARP, IPS, 5.70, 1440x720
Samsung Galaxy S8
Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, 5.80, 2960x1440
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Super AMOLED, 5.70, 2560x1440
Huawei Y7
IPS, 5.50, 1280x720
LG Q6
IPS, 5.50, 2160x1080
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 5.50, 1920x1080
Response Times
90%
88%
9%
21%
89%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 ?(23.6, 22)
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
88%
4.8 ?(2, 2.8)
89%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-30%
38 ?(19, 19)
17%
4.8 ?(2.8, 2)
89%
Response Time Black / White *
34.4 ?(18.8, 15.6)
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
91%
4.8 ?(2.8, 2)
86%
18.4 ?(3.6, 14.8)
47%
26 ?(13, 13)
24%
4 ?(2, 2)
88%
PWM Frequency
250
231.5
2315 ?(14)
257.7
Screen
31%
6%
24%
29%
27%
Brightness middle
544.2
566
4%
338
-38%
467
-14%
523
-4%
454
-17%
Brightness
539
564
5%
341
-37%
456
-15%
498
-8%
463
-14%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
90
-5%
92
-3%
88
-7%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.24
64%
Contrast
812
1197
47%
2179
168%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.4
2.7
64%
3.7
50%
4.3
42%
6.4
14%
2
73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.8
5.4
50%
7.9
27%
6.8
37%
11
-2%
5.3
51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.1
3.1
62%
4.9
40%
3.5
57%
7.4
9%
1.7
79%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.15 102%
2.25 98%
2.35 94%
2.4 92%
2.1 105%
CCT
8989 72%
6335 103%
7286 89%
7273 89%
8641 75%
6394 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
61% / 45%
47% / 27%
17% / 21%
25% / 28%
58% / 43%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
34.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 18.8 ms subida
↘ 15.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 91 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
45.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 23.6 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (33.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado ≤ 100 % de brillo

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 18110 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 5
177156 Points +320%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points +307%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
150228 Points +256%
Sony Xperia XA1
59082 Points +40%
Honor 6X
56764 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points +12%
Huawei Y7
43303 Points +3%
LG Q6
42718 Points +1%
Bluboo S8
42181 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
669 min
Samsung Galaxy S8
527 min
Computer Vision score
Samsung Galaxy S8
2730 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2024 Points +15%
Bluboo S8
1754 Points
Storage score
Samsung Galaxy S8
4420 Points +28%
Bluboo S8
3445 Points
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3440 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score
OnePlus 5
6579 Points +97%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
5972 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points +60%
Huawei Y7
3928 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points +11%
LG Q6
3710 Points +11%
Bluboo S8
3347 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
2249 Points -33%
Sony Xperia XA1
Points -100%
Work performance score
OnePlus 5
7826 Points
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
6318 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points
Huawei Y7
5365 Points
LG Q6
5081 Points
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points
Sony Xperia XA1
4759 Points
Honor 6X
4383 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points
BaseMark OS II
Web
OnePlus 5
1287 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points +65%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
985 Points +41%
Sony Xperia XA1
847 Points +21%
Honor 6X
720 Points +3%
Bluboo S8
701 Points
Huawei Y7
606 Points -14%
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points -99%
LG Q6
10 Points -99%
Graphics
OnePlus 5
6144 Points +854%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points +847%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4649 Points +622%
Sony Xperia XA1
1016 Points +58%
Honor 6X
819 Points +27%
Huawei Y7
768 Points +19%
Bluboo S8
644 Points
LG Q6
591 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points -17%
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points -41%
Memory
OnePlus 5
4423 Points +354%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points +212%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1948 Points +100%
Honor 6X
1779 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points +30%
Sony Xperia XA1
1063 Points +9%
Bluboo S8
974 Points
LG Q6
736 Points -24%
Huawei Y7
686 Points -30%
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points -43%
System
OnePlus 5
5902 Points +199%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points +173%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3220 Points +63%
Sony Xperia XA1
2969 Points +51%
Honor 6X
2721 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points +20%
Bluboo S8
1971 Points
Huawei Y7
1790 Points -9%
LG Q6
1489 Points -24%
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points -41%
Overall
OnePlus 5
3790 Points +293%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points +240%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2315 Points +140%
Honor 6X
1300 Points +35%
Sony Xperia XA1
1284 Points +33%
Bluboo S8
965 Points
Huawei Y7
869 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points -63%
LG Q6
282 Points -71%
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points -77%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points +509%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points +475%
Sony Xperia XA1
2747 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points +70%
Huawei Y7
2235 Points +60%
LG Q6
1840 Points +32%
Bluboo S8
1393 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 5
6799 Points +280%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points +275%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4359 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points +111%
Sony Xperia XA1
3621 Points +102%
Huawei Y7
2866 Points +60%
LG Q6
2210 Points +23%
Bluboo S8
1790 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points +231%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points +227%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1891 Points +214%
Sony Xperia XA1
828 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points +22%
LG Q6
647 Points +7%
Huawei Y7
645 Points +7%
Bluboo S8
603 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5
2963 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
2479 Points
Sony Xperia XA1
1928 Points
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1864 Points
Honor 6X
1438 Points
Huawei Y7
1352 Points
LG Q6
1028 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
966 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5
4151 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
3584 Points
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3099 Points
Sony Xperia XA1
583 Points
Huawei Y7
306 Points
Honor 6X
299 Points
LG Q6
237 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
131 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 5
3811 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
3261 Points
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2701 Points
Sony Xperia XA1
690 Points
Huawei Y7
370 Points
Honor 6X
363 Points
LG Q6
286 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
163 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5
2960 Points +321%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2454 Points +249%
Sony Xperia XA1
1900 Points +170%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1788 Points +154%
Honor 6X
1391 Points +98%
Huawei Y7
1382 Points +97%
LG Q6
1002 Points +43%
Doogee Shoot 1
767 Points +9%
Bluboo S8
703 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5
5077 Points +1043%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4908 Points +1005%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4635 Points +944%
Sony Xperia XA1
833 Points +88%
Huawei Y7
542 Points +22%
Honor 6X
477 Points +7%
Bluboo S8
444 Points
LG Q6
425 Points -4%
Doogee Shoot 1
220 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 5
4381 Points +805%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4016 Points +730%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3424 Points +607%
Sony Xperia XA1
978 Points +102%
Huawei Y7
620 Points +28%
Honor 6X
559 Points +15%
Bluboo S8
484 Points
LG Q6
482 Points 0%
Doogee Shoot 1
261 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
OnePlus 5
3026 Points +326%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points +251%
Sony Xperia XA1
1804 Points +154%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1787 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points +114%
Honor 6X
1440 Points +103%
Huawei Y7
1340 Points +89%
LG Q6
1016 Points +43%
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points +20%
Bluboo S8
710 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 5
3757 Points +1182%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points +1085%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2767 Points +844%
Sony Xperia XA1
574 Points +96%
Honor 6X
318 Points +9%
Bluboo S8
293 Points
Huawei Y7
281 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points -32%
LG Q6
188 Points -36%
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 5
3566 Points +958%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points +848%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2466 Points +632%
Sony Xperia XA1
677 Points +101%
Honor 6X
385 Points +14%
Huawei Y7
341 Points +1%
Bluboo S8
337 Points
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points -27%
LG Q6
230 Points -32%
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
OnePlus 5
3012 Points +319%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points +240%
Sony Xperia XA1
1892 Points +164%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1721 Points +140%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points +114%
Honor 6X
1433 Points +100%
Huawei Y7
1360 Points +89%
LG Q6
995 Points +39%
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points +22%
Bluboo S8
718 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points +989%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points +954%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4354 Points +863%
Sony Xperia XA1
827 Points +83%
Huawei Y7
533 Points +18%
Honor 6X
468 Points +4%
Bluboo S8
452 Points
LG Q6
404 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points -38%
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 5
4219 Points +756%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points +714%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3249 Points +559%
Sony Xperia XA1
945 Points +92%
Huawei Y7
616 Points +25%
Honor 6X
550 Points +12%
Bluboo S8
493 Points
LG Q6
465 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points -31%
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
22750 Points +284%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points +264%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points +228%
Sony Xperia XA1
16394 Points +177%
Honor 6X
13535 Points +128%
Honor 6X
13535 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points +119%
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points +61%
Huawei Y7
9345 Points +58%
LG Q6
8983 Points +52%
Bluboo S8
5926 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus 5
58001 Points +711%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points +408%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
34038 Points +376%
Sony Xperia XA1
13125 Points +83%
Honor 6X
11353 Points +59%
Honor 6X
11353 Points +59%
Huawei Y7
10152 Points +42%
LG Q6
7924 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points +4%
Bluboo S8
7155 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 5
40229 Points +488%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points +361%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
30658 Points +348%
Sony Xperia XA1
13734 Points +101%
Honor 6X
11775 Points +72%
Honor 6X
11775 Points +72%
Huawei Y7
9961 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points +22%
LG Q6
8137 Points +19%
Bluboo S8
6840 Points
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points -3%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 5
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.1 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 5
9.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
0.63 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 5
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
9.5 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 5
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
14.2 fps
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 5
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
11 fps
Sony Xperia XA1
7.9 fps
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps
Honor 6X
3 fps
LG Q6
2.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 5
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
19 fps
Sony Xperia XA1
3.7 fps
Honor 6X
2.8 fps
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps
LG Q6
2.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps +858%
Sony Xperia XA1
4.88 fps +53%
Bluboo S8
3.2 fps
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points +603%
Sony Xperia XA1
9655 Points +61%
Bluboo S8
6004 Points
Medium Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points +237%
Sony Xperia XA1
18345 Points +41%
Bluboo S8
13009 Points
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps +67%
Sony Xperia XA1
57.8 fps +61%
Bluboo S8
35.8 fps
High Quality
Bluboo S8
48.2 fps
High Performance
Bluboo S8
49.6 fps

Leyenda

 
Bluboo S8 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points +279%
Samsung Galaxy S8
65.8 Points +249%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
56.9 Points +201%
Sony Xperia XA1
28.45 Points +51%
Honor 6X
26.46 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
25.97 Points +38%
Doogee Shoot 1
20.78 Points +10%
Huawei Y7
20.6 Points +9%
Bluboo S8
18.88 Points
LG Q6
16.53 Points -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points +304%
OnePlus 5
11945 Points +273%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
9863 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4560 Points +43%
Honor 6X
4199 Points +31%
Sony Xperia XA1
3956 Points +24%
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points +6%
Huawei Y7
3209 Points 0%
Bluboo S8
3200 Points
LG Q6
2689 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Bluboo S8
14150 ms *
LG Q6
13102 ms * +7%
Doogee Shoot 1
11058 ms * +22%
Huawei Y7
11007 ms * +22%
Sony Xperia XA1
9506 ms * +33%
Honor 6X
9373 ms * +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
6821 ms * +52%
OnePlus 5
2622 ms * +81%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2423 ms * +83%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1887 ms * +87%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S8
194 Points +181%
OnePlus 5
161 Points +133%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
142 Points +106%
Sony Xperia XA1
78 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
75 Points +9%
Honor 6X
73 Points +6%
Bluboo S8
69 Points
LG Q6
55 Points -20%
Huawei Y7
44 Points -36%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Bluboo S8
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei Y7
16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Q6
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
95%
52%
-17%
18%
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.9
53.5
-4%
62.6
12%
62.6
12%
62.6
12%
63.9
14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.9
63.9
-16%
83.4
10%
82.5
9%
84.8
12%
76.1
0%
Random Write 4KB
12.37
15.25
23%
13.51
9%
6.9
-44%
9.2
-26%
10.54
-15%
Random Read 4KB
38.24
127.2
233%
88.4
131%
53.2
39%
54.3
42%
25.86
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.6
193.2
149%
142.8
84%
33.2
-57%
133.5
72%
53
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
281
793
182%
458.9
63%
119.4
-58%
263.1
-6%
198.5
-29%
Carga Máx.
 41.4 °C34.4 °C31.6 °C 
 39 °C33 °C32.2 °C 
 37 °C34.4 °C31.2 °C 
Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
32.8 °C34.6 °C46.4 °C
33 °C34.2 °C42.4 °C
32.8 °C34 °C38.2 °C
Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203635.52534.134.43132.633.74033.632.45031.233.96330.931.88031.230.710030.629.612528.829.116027.828.720027.727.825026.728.231525.83440025.540.750025.347.263024.553.280024.359.6100024.567.6125024.474.4160023.974.2200023.671.1250023.873.1315023.472.1400023.677.4500023.478630023.567.6800023.664.31000023.660.31250023.5571600023.653.4SPL36.184.8N2.651.9median 24.3median 59.6Delta1.416.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBluboo S8Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Bluboo S8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.99 / 1.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.4 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 6.5 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Bluboo S8
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
Samsung Galaxy S8
Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
SD 821, Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
LG Q6
435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash, Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Power Consumption
33%
2%
35%
22%
56%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.78
51%
0.88
45%
0.57
64%
0.92
42%
0.39
76%
Idle Average *
2.4
1.1
54%
1.24
48%
1.61
33%
2.19
9%
1.06
56%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.16
54%
1.26
50%
1.62
35%
2.24
10%
1.08
57%
Load Average *
6.5
4.15
36%
7.71
-19%
3.09
52%
3.38
48%
1.82
72%
Load Maximum *
4
5.12
-28%
8.64
-116%
4.26
-7%
4
-0%
3.21
20%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
17h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 30min
Carga (máximo brillo)
4h 15min
Bluboo S8
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy S8
Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20,  Wh
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
SD 821, Adreno 530,  Wh
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 15.2 Wh
LG Q6
435, Adreno 505, 10.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1,  Wh
Duración de Batería
48%
13%
74%
18%
107%
Reader / Idle
1069
1667
56%
1476
38%
1914
79%
1367
28%
1950
82%
WiFi v1.3
390
719
84%
444
14%
716
84%
502
29%
904
132%
Load
255
264
4%
221
-13%
402
58%
251
-2%
525
106%

Pro

+ Adaptador USB tipo C a 3.5 mm incluido
+ USB tipo C + dual-SIM con MicroSD
+ luz de fondo muy brillante
+ carcasa sólida y pesada
+ barato

Contra

- tiempos de respuesta de pantalla lento; muchos efecto fantasma
- procesador lento y rendimiento
- lector de huellas poco fiable
- sin audio integrado de 3.5 mm
- aplicación telefónica inoperable
- la vibración tiende a traquetear
- el altavoz podría ser más fuerte
- mala calidad de la cámara
- duración promedio de la batería
- colores inexactos
En análisis: Bluboo S8. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Bluboo
En análisis: Bluboo S8. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Bluboo

El Bluboo S8 se ve genial, se siente bien en la mano y tiene una pantalla sorprendentemente brillante de 18:9. Todo lo demás es simplemente tibio en el mejor de los casos o incluso no funciona en el peor. 

Para empezar, los usuarios de América del Norte deben tener en cuenta que el Bluboo S8 no lleva las bandas 3G o 4G necesarios para la compatibilidad con los principales proveedores. Segundo, la aplicación del teléfono se colgaba en nuestra unidad, incluso después de actualizar a la última versión del software. La vibración es débil, los colores están apagados, al lector de huellas le cuesta varios intentos, la calidad de la cámara es granulada, el ruido estático parece estar en intervalos aleatorios, y la falta de un conector de audio resulta insultante, especialmente cuando los fundamentos básicos son tan erróneos. Tal vez simplemente recibimos una unidad defectuosa, pero al mismo tiempo, esto no refleja bien los estándares de calidad de Bluboo y la longevidad del dispositivo.

Un clon Galaxy S8 por fuera, pero un teléfono ultra-económico dentro. No esperamos mucho de un smartphone por menos de $150 USD, excepto por las funciones básicas, pero el Bluboo S8 ni siquiera puede recibir llamadas o conseguir que el altavoz funcione de manera fiable.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

 

 

Bluboo S8 - 11/16/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabado
73%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Ratón
84%
Conectividad
21 / 60 → 35%
Peso
88%
Battería
89%
Pantalla
76%
Rendimiento de juegos
20 / 63 → 32%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
37 / 70 → 53%
Temperatura
88%
Ruido
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Cámara
32%
Médio
62%
73%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
Allen Ngo, 2017-11-18 (Update: 2017-11-18)