Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Honor 8 Pro

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 05/08/PM

Nuevos pastos. Con el Honor 8 Pro a la última, la subsidiaria de Huawei llegó por fin a la primera división de los smartphones. Puedes descubrir en nuestro análisis cómo queda el Honor más potente de todos los tiempos en comparación con los competidores conocidos del segmento de gama alta.

Honor 8 Pro (8 Serie)
Procesador
HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memoría
6144 MB 
pantalla
5.7 pulgadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixels 515 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil, LCD, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, lustroso: si
Disco duro
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.7 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3,5 Millimeter Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: microSD hasta 128 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: hall, infrarrojos, proximidad, iluminación, brújula, gravedad, giroscopio, indicador de estado, USB OTG, Miracast, LED de estado
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz LTE (FDD): Bandas 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 LTE (TDD): Bandas 38, 40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 6.97 x 157 x 77.5
Battería
4000 mAh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12 MP, autofocus con flash LED
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 77° con lente gran angular
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, headset VR (paquete), Emotion UI 5.1 (compatible con Android 7.0), 24 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
184 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 52 g
Precio
549 Euros

 

Size Comparisons

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
368 MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼76% +19%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +9%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
249 MBit/s ∼68% +6%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
236 MBit/s ∼64%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
48.8 MBit/s ∼13% -79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
656 MBit/s ∼100% +182%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼51% +44%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +34%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
260 MBit/s ∼40% +12%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
233 MBit/s ∼36%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
154 MBit/s ∼23% -34%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
502
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 541 cd/m² Médio: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.49 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 541 cd/m²
Contraste: 1803:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U Play
Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-22%
-33%
-15%
-8%
28%
30%
-54%
16%
Brightness
514
556
8%
366
-29%
432
-16%
434
-16%
552
7%
562
9%
430
-16%
490
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
87
-4%
90
-1%
93
2%
96
5%
93
2%
84
-8%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.43
-43%
0.25
17%
0.36
-20%
Contrast
1803
1272
-29%
1696
-6%
1236
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
4.8
-50%
5.1
-59%
5.7
-78%
2.8
12%
1.59
50%
1.7
47%
7.1
-122%
2.1
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
4.5
-13%
5.5
-38%
4.1
-3%
3.7
7%
2.01
50%
1.6
60%
6.8
-70%
2.6
35%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
2.24 107%
2.32 103%
2.31 104%
2.01 119%
2.13 113%
2.23 108%
2.23 108%
CCT
7120 91%
7194 90%
7388 88%
7359 88%
7164 91%
6321 103%
6435 101%
7866 83%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
81.57
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
99.87
100

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 59 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 2255 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 10 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 26 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (27.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
52.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 30.8 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (44 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼79%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼76% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼53% -33%
HTC U Play
51628 Points ∼28% -65%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼90% +13%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼87% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼70% -12%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼23%
HTC U Play
2825 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼24%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼35%
HTC U Play
775 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼36%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼34%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼27%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼57%
HTC 10
4021 Points ∼36% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼61% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼42%
HTC 10
1654 Points ∼37% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼45% +9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼87%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼75% -14%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼100% +15%
HTC U Play
1498 Points ∼59% -32%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼97% +11%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼68% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼70% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +38%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% -54%
HTC U Play
349 Points ∼6% -80%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +99%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +24%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -48%
HTC U Play
421 Points ∼11% -77%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +74%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼85% +16%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼90% +23%
HTC U Play
1516 Points ∼59% -20%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼95% +30%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼56% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼71% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +52%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% -44%
HTC U Play
565 Points ∼7% -70%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +147%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +158%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼38%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼54% +42%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% -36%
HTC U Play
657 Points ∼13% -65%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼81% +112%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼53% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼62% +62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼22%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼22% +1%
HTC U Play
9970 Points ∼14% -34%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼29% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼28% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼30% +38%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +48%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% -32%
HTC U Play
11713 Points ∼3% -64%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% +3%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% -23%
HTC U Play
11275 Points ∼6% -56%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +14%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +20%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% -5%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼1% -58%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +142%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +112%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼13%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% -7%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% -27%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼4% -69%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -2%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +3%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% -38%
HTC U Play
7.1 fps ∼1% -76%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +72%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼9%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼14% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼8% -5%
HTC U Play
7 fps ∼3% -65%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼11% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼17% +90%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20% +125%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼11% +30%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% -52%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼1% -77%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +100%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +52%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼7%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +92%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% -15%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼3% -63%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +77%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +146%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +15%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% -59%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼1% -83%
HTC 10
18 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% +67%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼6% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% -38%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼0% -77%
HTC 10
10 fps ∼0% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% +18%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼1% +82%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% -11%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼91%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼90% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼88% -3%
HTC U Play
3356 Points ∼41% -54%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼72% -21%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼70% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼94% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% -7%
HTC U Play
10 Points ∼1% -99%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +3%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -15%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% -63%
HTC U Play
666 Points ∼8% -84%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +51%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +6%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼100%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼62% -38%
HTC U Play
996 Points ∼23% -77%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼46% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51% -49%
System (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼61%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% -2%
HTC U Play
2173 Points ∼33% -46%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +32%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -16%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼90%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼79% -12%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼61% -32%
HTC U Play
344 Points ∼10% -88%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼66% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼67% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼71% -21%

Leyenda

 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Play Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼94% +32%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points ∼86% +20%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼73% +2%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
10016 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼70% -2%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼63% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
7771 Points ∼55% -22%
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
3163 Points ∼23% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
9981.6 ms * ∼100% -216%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
3156.7 ms * ∼32%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
3154.7 ms * ∼32% -0%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼32% -0%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼31% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792.3 ms * ∼28% +12%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼27% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼26% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼22% +29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points ∼93% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼83% +7%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
58.065 Points ∼77%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼77% 0%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼73% -6%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼69% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
47.5 Points ∼63% -18%
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
22.318 Points ∼30% -62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
163 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
141 Points ∼87%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼83% -4%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼83% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points ∼80% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
112 Points ∼69% -21%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼66% -23%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-39%
-51%
-19%
-16%
1%
-33%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
24.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
23.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
103%
50.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
57%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78%
45.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
62.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
36.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-32%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54%
76.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
41%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
31%
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
Random Write 4KB
151.6
152.31
0%
51.23
-66%
52.7
-65%
15.89
-90%
15.79
-90%
15.27
-90%
74.39
-51%
74.93
-51%
Random Read 4KB
166.4
168.42
1%
39.33
-76%
32
-81%
29.92
-82%
86.71
-48%
127.18
-24%
123.57
-26%
117.15
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.1
189.83
1%
140.38
-25%
135.5
-28%
115.56
-38%
145.11
-22%
194.18
4%
165.3
-12%
168.32
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
737.8
737.65
0%
284.27
-61%
197.3
-73%
275.09
-63%
487.34
-34%
787.6
7%
436.43
-41%
439.66
-40%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Carga Máx.
 43 °C41.6 °C39.9 °C 
 41.9 °C39.8 °C44.8 °C 
 40.6 °C40.2 °C42 °C 
Máximo: 44.8 °C
Médio: 41.5 °C
37.5 °C39.2 °C40.9 °C
37.6 °C38 °C41.2 °C
37.4 °C39 °C39.7 °C
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
Conector de corriente  31.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.82525.432.83125.330.74032.924.95033.634.26331.633.78028.4311002728.112520.831.8160222820021.33925020.852.631521.261.240019.468.650019.570.863017.769.280017.968.1100017.865.1125017.365.5160017.470200016.772.8250017.274.3315018.270.2400017.974.5500017.670.6630017.766.7800017.861.11000017.961.21250018.154.21600018.242.6SPL3082.4N1.352.7median 17.9Honor 8 Promedian 65.5Delta1.31131.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.69.83.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt
Carga midlight 6.58 / 10.12 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
35%
23%
15%
33%
42%
15%
40%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.83
15%
0.87
11%
0.92
6%
0.68
31%
0.63
36%
0.68
31%
0.61
38%
0.66
33%
Idle Average *
2.27
2.1
7%
1.2
47%
1.84
19%
1.49
34%
1.1
52%
1.13
50%
1.77
22%
1.01
56%
Idle Maximum *
2.36
2.18
8%
1.27
46%
2
15%
1.91
19%
1.56
34%
1.16
51%
1.81
23%
1.09
54%
Load Average *
6.58
6.57
-0%
4.69
29%
4.3
35%
7.4
-12%
5.95
10%
4.69
29%
6.67
-1%
3.97
40%
Load Maximum *
10.12
9.32
8%
5.63
44%
6.2
39%
9.71
4%
6.7
34%
5.24
48%
10.98
-8%
8.34
18%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
22h 58min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
9h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 15min
Carga (máximo brillo)
3h 01min
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Duración de Batería
26%
16%
14%
-6%
-7%
26%
16%
14%
Reader / Idle
1378
1538
12%
1540
12%
1446
5%
1302
-6%
1273
-8%
1565
14%
1423
3%
1371
-1%
Load
181
219
21%
176
-3%
263
45%
223
23%
203
12%
275
52%
282
56%
320
77%
WiFi v1.3
573
758
32%
966
69%
530
-8%
473
-17%
413
-28%
736
28%
494
-14%
407
-29%
H.264
675
947
40%
582
-14%
776
15%
514
-24%
648
-4%
742
10%
810
20%
724
7%

Pro

+ brillante panel IPS de alto contraste
+ QHD
+ rendimiento
+ 6 GB de RAM
+ veloz almacenamiento UFS-2.1 de 64 GB
+ dual-SIM
+ precisión de color del display
+ buena cámara dual ...

Contra

- ... pero no al nivel de la gama alta
- elevado calor residual
- sin Bluetooth 5.0
- transferencias WLAN lentas
- sólo USB 2.0
- GPS mediocre
Honor 8 Pro. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Honor Alemania.
Honor 8 Pro. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Honor Alemania.

El Honor 8 Pro es un smartphone gama alta ópticamente muy exitoso y bien construido con un rendimiento de sistema excelente. Comparado con los dispositivos actuales de gama alta y algunos de la cosecha pasada, tenemos que conformarnos con menos en muchos sitios, a pesar de su amplia RAM de 6 GB. 

En el Honor 8 Pro, no vemos (aún) la excelente relación precio-rendimiento que ha hecho famosa a los dispositivos Honor. Los smartphones gama alta del año pasado (tales como el Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge) a veces ofrecen un mejor paquete en general por menos dinero, habida cuenta que esos dispositivos han pasado ya su mayor bajada de precio.

Características tales como Bluetooth 4.2 en vez de 5.0, la gráfica relativamente "débil", una cámara frontal sin auto-focus, y el estándar USB-2.0 diferencian al Honor 8 Pro de los actuales smartphones insignia de otros fabricantes. Además, ni se puede cargar la batería inalámbricamente, ni el dispositivo está certificado según el estándar IP de protección frente al polvo y al agua. Los bordes de la carcasa son ligeramente largos y la r4elación display-frontal es relativamente ineficiente, al menos para un dispositivo de 2017.   

Con todo, el Honor 8 Pro es un smartphone muy exitoso y una alternativa recomendable a los dispositivos Huawei P10. Pero a nuestro parecer no es un ataque al Olimpo smartphone de 2017. 

A pesar de ello, las políticas de Huawei de eliminar componentes hardware dejan un mal sabor de boca – si todos los compradores del Honor-8-Pro disfrutarán del moderno almacenamiento UFS-2.1 es al menos cuestionable.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Honor 8 Pro - 05/04/AM v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
89%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Ratón
93%
Conectividad
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
89%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
55 / 63 → 87%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
69 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
85%
Ruido
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Cámara
74%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Honor 8 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-05- 8 (Update: 2017-05- 8)