Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Huawei Y6 Pro 2017

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 11/15/2017

Pequeño. Bonito. Barato. El Huawei Y6 Pro (2017) es el último modelo de la serie Y. Nos gustó la bonita carcasa de metal del smartphone básico, su decentísimo hardware, y su tamaño compacto. Por desgracia, también encontramos un problema en particular que podría mejorar muchísimo.

Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Y Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitiva, multitáctil 10 dedos, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.17 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 128 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerómetro, proximidad, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 4G LTE FDD: B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20 4G TD-LTE: B40 3G: B1/B2/B5/B8 2G: 850/900/1800/1900, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8 x 143.9 x 71
Battería
3020 mAh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 200 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 12 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, cargador, cable USB, guía de inicio rápido, headset, garantía, EMUI 5.1, 24 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
145 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 34 g
Precio
199 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503 MBit/s ∼100% +873%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼16% +57%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.9 MBit/s ∼11% +2%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼10% +1%
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
Adreno 405, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼9% -9%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼9% -16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼8% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 MBit/s ∼100% +1278%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76.6 MBit/s ∼12% +62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼8% +13%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼8% +8%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 MBit/s ∼8% +7%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼7% +3%
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
Adreno 405, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼7% -1%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
396
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 407 cd/m² Médio: 387.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5.08 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 393 cd/m²
Contraste: 936:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y7
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 6A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Screen
58%
11%
2%
8%
-5%
22%
27%
Brightness
388
432
11%
456
18%
425
10%
462
19%
469
21%
494
27%
536
38%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
92
2%
93
3%
94
4%
84
-7%
89
-1%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.13
69%
0.39
7%
0.37
12%
0.43
-2%
0.22
48%
0.35
17%
Contrast
936
3369
260%
1197
28%
1149
23%
1116
19%
2186
134%
1434
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
4.8
17%
4.3
26%
4.7
19%
5.2
10%
8.1
-40%
4.6
21%
2.6
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
3.2
-7%
3.5
-17%
4.6
-53%
3.1
-3%
8.5
-183%
2.5
17%
2.7
10%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.23 108%
2.35 102%
2.17 111%
2.4 100%
2.16 111%
2.29 105%
2.04 118%
CCT
7060 92%
7090 92%
7273 89%
7445 87%
6688 97%
9014 72%
6351 102%
6206 105%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8499 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
26.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 12.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.6 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20.8 ms subida
↘ 19.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
36414 Points ∼16%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% +13%
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼19% +19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼13% -16%
Honor 6A
43936 Points ∼19% +21%
Nokia 3
27703 Points ∼12% -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points ∼16% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼76% +378%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
3363 Points ∼33%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼38% +17%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼27% -18%
Honor 6A
3710 Points ∼36% +10%
Nokia 3
2568 Points ∼25% -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼49% +52%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
4491 Points ∼53%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼54% +3%
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼63% +19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼42% -19%
Honor 6A
4820 Points ∼56% +7%
Nokia 3
3439 Points ∼40% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼71% +35%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
802 Points ∼47%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼43% -8%
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼36% -24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼37% -23%
Honor 6A
606 Points ∼36% -24%
Nokia 3
575 Points ∼34% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points ∼39% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼73% +54%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
436 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% -11%
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼8% +76%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼2% -52%
Honor 6A
734 Points ∼8% +68%
Nokia 3
211 Points ∼2% -52%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points ∼3% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼66% +1304%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
689 Points ∼16%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +87%
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼16% 0%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼13% -14%
Honor 6A
765 Points ∼17% +11%
Nokia 3
703 Points ∼16% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points ∼24% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼70% +349%
System (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
1195 Points ∼12%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼13% +13%
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼17% +50%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼11% -9%
Honor 6A
1678 Points ∼16% +40%
Nokia 3
1081 Points ∼11% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points ∼14% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼52% +344%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
733 Points ∼19%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% +14%
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼23% +19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼14% -27%
Honor 6A
870 Points ∼23% +19%
Nokia 3
551 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points ∼19% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼88% +355%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
1858 Points ∼7%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼8% +2%
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼11% +54%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼6% -16%
Honor 6A
2612 Points ∼10% +41%
Nokia 3
1520 Points ∼6% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼27% +263%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
664 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼11% +2%
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼11% -3%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼9% -16%
Honor 6A
638 Points ∼11% -4%
Nokia 3
556 Points ∼9% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points ∼11% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34% +205%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
897 Points ∼29%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼31% +8%
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼44% +52%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼24% -16%
Honor 6A
1339 Points ∼43% +49%
Nokia 3
745 Points ∼24% -17%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points ∼30% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼76% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
43 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% +414%
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼7% +1140%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼2% +209%
Honor 6A
507 Points ∼7% +1079%
Nokia 3
124 Points ∼2% +188%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points ∼1% +114%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼51% +9035%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
55 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% +385%
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼12% +1020%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼3% +196%
Honor 6A
588 Points ∼12% +969%
Nokia 3
152 Points ∼3% +176%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points ∼2% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼69% +6107%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
10466 Points ∼15%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +6%
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼13% -11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -20%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -20%
Honor 6A
9297 Points ∼13% -11%
Nokia 3
7925 Points ∼11% -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points ∼16% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼32% +118%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
5528 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% +12%
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼2% +84%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -42%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -42%
Honor 6A
9663 Points ∼2% +75%
Nokia 3
3177 Points ∼1% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points ∼1% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8% +566%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
6175 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% +11%
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼5% +61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -40%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -40%
Honor 6A
9579 Points ∼5% +55%
Nokia 3
3665 Points ∼2% -41%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points ∼2% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼16% +425%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
7.7 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% +43%
Huawei Y7
17 fps ∼1% +121%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼0% -22%
Honor 6A
16 fps ∼1% +108%
Nokia 3
6 fps ∼0% -22%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps ∼0% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼8% +1264%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
14 fps ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼4% +21%
Huawei Y7
24 fps ∼5% +71%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼2% -21%
Honor 6A
26 fps ∼6% +86%
Nokia 3
10 fps ∼2% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps ∼2% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13% +321%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
2.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% +39%
Huawei Y7
7.5 fps ∼1% +168%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼0% -21%
Honor 6A
7.1 fps ∼1% +154%
Nokia 3
2.2 fps ∼0% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps ∼0% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9% +1721%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
6.4 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼2% +27%
Huawei Y7
16 fps ∼4% +150%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼1% -25%
Honor 6A
15 fps ∼4% +134%
Nokia 3
4.5 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps ∼1% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10% +494%

Leyenda

 
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼100% +281%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
21.323 Points ∼31% +17%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
20.6 Points ∼30% +13%
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61)
18.244 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼25% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points ∼25% -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼21% -20%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
13.97 Points ∼20% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼100% +345%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
3326 Points ∼25% +11%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
3209 Points ∼24% +8%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼23% +4%
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61)
2984 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points ∼22% -2%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼17% -24%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
2269 Points ∼17% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -44%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
16759 ms * ∼96% -39%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * ∼73% -6%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼70% -2%
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61)
12067.7 ms * ∼69%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
11007 ms * ∼63% +9%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
10921.2 ms * ∼63% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼11% +84%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Huawei Y6 Pro 2017Huawei Y6 2017Huawei Y7Lenovo Moto E4 PlusHonor 6ANokia 3Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Samsung Galaxy Note 8
AndroBench 3-5
22%
-6%
41%
4%
-19%
-1%
170%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26.4
-59%
62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
46.6
-27%
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
62.9
-2%
59.6
-7%
59.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
48.4
-42%
82.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
66.3
-21%
83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
64.3
-23%
70.3
-16%
67.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
6.78
20.54
203%
6.9
2%
29.4
334%
6.94
2%
5.5
-19%
9.5
40%
14.55
115%
Random Read 4KB
45.65
25.93
-43%
53.15
16%
19.15
-58%
50.21
10%
17.7
-61%
24
-47%
122.48
168%
Sequential Write 256KB
50.74
66.88
32%
33.2
-35%
42
-17%
64.06
26%
34
-33%
51
1%
205.85
306%
Sequential Read 256KB
143.43
202.55
41%
119.4
-17%
194.4
36%
123.57
-14%
181
26%
177.7
24%
796.96
456%
Carga Máx.
 36.7 °C35.7 °C34.5 °C 
 36.1 °C35.6 °C35.1 °C 
 34.8 °C34.1 °C33.3 °C 
Máximo: 36.7 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
31.1 °C31.4 °C32 °C
31 °C31.5 °C32 °C
31 °C31.1 °C31.7 °C
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C
Conector de corriente  26.3 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.243.92532.944.53137.237.94031.738.35039.642.16328.3348027.333.510026.931.512526.732.61602430.620020.934.725020.936.631519.540.840018.54650017.555.463017.56080015.768.3100015.868.3125016.670160015.866200015.468.5250015.570.531501672.5400015.876.750001680.5630016.374.8800016.370.91000016.272.91250016.469.21600016.454.9SPL28.685.3N1.156.4median 16.4Huawei Y6 Pro 2017median 68.3Delta2.11329.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7Huawei Y6 2017median 17.6median 65.711.52.711.531.637.125.436.725.336.932.929.733.632.331.633.728.427.5272720.825.62226.321.331.520.839.821.24619.45319.559.217.762.217.964.417.86917.370.717.469.316.771.517.27418.274.417.976.717.676.817.77217.870.417.968.718.16818.263.83083.81.355.6median 17.9Honor 6Amedian 681.312.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 6A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 2.02 / 2.08 Watt
Carga midlight 5.31 / 6.41 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
3020 mAh
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Power Consumption
25%
9%
-27%
27%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.57
5%
0.89
-48%
1.33
-122%
0.67
-12%
0.82
-37%
Idle Average *
2.02
1.61
20%
1.87
7%
2.53
-25%
1.35
33%
1.94
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.08
1.62
22%
1.98
5%
2.54
-22%
1.39
33%
2.06
1%
Load Average *
5.31
3.09
42%
3.04
43%
3.84
28%
3.1
42%
3.31
38%
Load Maximum *
6.41
4.26
34%
4.01
37%
6.12
5%
4.02
37%
3.89
39%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
11h 08min
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
3020 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
668
654
-2%
716
7%
788
18%
790
18%
552
-17%
722
8%

Pro

+ Dual SIM o tarketa SD
+ compacto y de gran calidad
+ bien hecho
+ gran aguante de batería
+ GPS preciso
+ bajas temperaturas superficiales (trasera)

Contra

- rendimiento
- SoC de mal rendimiento
- display peor que el del Huawei Y6 2017
- memoria lenta
- altavoz
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017. Cortesía de Huawei Alemania.
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017. Cortesía de Huawei Alemania.

El Huawei Y6 Pro (2017) es un smartphone básico compacto y bonito que no te costará un ojo. Por unos  $200 tienes un dispositivo biene quipado con 16 GB de almacenamiento, 2 GB de RAM, y una carcasa de metal bien hecha. Además, el aguante de batería es decente gracias a su gran batería de 3,020 mAh.

Por desgracia, Huawei no ha logrado atajar algunos de los defectos de sus hermanos no-Pro, y los ha continuado en el modelo Pro también. Por ejemplo, el rendimiento Wi-Fi sigue siendo inferior, y la selección de bandas LTE soportadas es relativamente magra. El display sigue igual de oscuro, ¡pero por algún motivo su contraste y punto de negro son aún más bajos que en el Y6 (2017)! No tenemos ni idea de qué es lo que hizo que vieran el display como adecuado para un dispositivo  “Pro”.

El mayor problema que tuvimos fue el rendimiento de sistema malo y errático. La UI de Huawei EMUI 5.1 no va tan fluida en un Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 lo que resulta en trastabilles y lag regulares.

A pesar de los defectos en display y rendimiento, el Huawei Y6 Pro (2017) es en general un paquete decente por unos  $200. Si merece la subida de precios respecto a su hermano no-Pro depende de cada uno.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 - 11/06/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Ratón
88%
Conectividad
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
93%
Battería
94%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
6 / 63 → 10%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
38 / 70 → 54%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Cámara
61%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-11-15 (Update: 2017-11-15)