Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto C Plus

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 08/30/2017

¡El mejor Moto C! El fabricante chino Lenovo intenta renovar el rango de bajo presupuesto del mercado de smartphones con su nueva serie C. Nuestro análisis muestra que el Moto C Plus tiene algunas mejoras en comparación con su contraparte de 5" sin el "plus" adicional.

Lenovo Moto C Plus (Moto C Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
1024 MB 
, 1GB
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: jack de audio de 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD de hasta 32 GB, Sensores: acelerómetro, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 10 x 144 x 72.3
Battería
4000 mAh Litio-Polimero, removeable, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 30 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP apertura focal de ƒ / 2.2 1.12 µm lente de 71° , foco fijo, flash LED, Modo ráfaga, Panorama, video HDR: 720p (30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 2 MP apertura focal de f / 2.8 , 1.0 µm lente de 63° , foco fijo, flash LED , Modo ráfaga, HDR
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: virtual, cable USB, fuente de alimentación modular , Moto UI, 24 Meses Garantía, Valor de SAR: 0,736 w/kg (cabeza), fanless
Peso
162 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 43 g
Precio
140 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼100% +641%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼31% +132%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼25% +83%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼24% +77%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s ∼16% +22%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼15% +11%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.4 MBit/s ∼13%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.7 MBit/s ∼13% -2%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼13% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +1340%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼15% +119%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 MBit/s ∼15% +118%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76.6 MBit/s ∼12% +69%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼8% +10%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.6 MBit/s ∼8% +10%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼8% +9%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.2 MBit/s ∼7% +4%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.2 MBit/s ∼7%
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Lenovo Moto C Plus
GPS test Lenovo Moto C Plus
GPS test Lenovo Moto C Plus

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
475
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 497 cd/m² Médio: 471.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.39 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 492 cd/m²
Contraste: 2139:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | - Ø
96.3% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.05
Lenovo Moto C Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto C
TFT, 854x480, 5
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview P2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview R6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Screen
-73%
-75%
-30%
-52%
-39%
-53%
-60%
-28%
22%
Brightness
472
355
-25%
418
-11%
469
-1%
351
-26%
414
-12%
420
-11%
320
-32%
498
6%
564
19%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
92
2%
84
-7%
93
3%
94
4%
85
-6%
81
-10%
86
-4%
94
4%
Black Level *
0.23
0.31
-35%
0.45
-96%
0.22
4%
0.49
-113%
0.42
-83%
0.15
35%
0.3
-30%
0.23
-0%
Contrast
2139
1174
-45%
929
-57%
2186
2%
731
-66%
981
-54%
2827
32%
1173
-45%
2270
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
10.4
-93%
9.7
-80%
8.1
-50%
7.1
-31%
5.6
-4%
9.5
-76%
8.7
-61%
6.9
-28%
2.7
50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
12.7
-243%
11.3
-205%
8.5
-130%
6.5
-76%
6.9
-86%
14.5
-292%
10.5
-184%
9.2
-149%
3.1
16%
Gamma
2.05 117%
2.04 118%
2.27 106%
2.16 111%
2.12 113%
2.4 100%
2.28 105%
2.04 118%
2.38 101%
2.15 112%
CCT
7182 91%
12904 50%
10414 62%
9014 72%
8166 80%
8422 77%
10840 60%
8529 76%
8687 75%
6335 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 55 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8587 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 86 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17 ms subida
↘ 19 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 25 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (42.5 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
29911 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto C
25338 Points ∼11% -15%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points ∼13% +1%
Nokia 3
27703 Points ∼12% -7%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -5%
Blackview P2
41852 Points ∼18% +40%
Blackview R6
38038 Points ∼17% +27%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +64%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +475%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2754 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto C
2313 Points ∼22% -16%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼25% -6%
Nokia 3
2568 Points ∼25% -7%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points ∼29% +8%
Blackview P2
2782 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% +95%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3308 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto C
2877 Points ∼34% -13%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼39% +1%
Nokia 3
3439 Points ∼40% +4%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼55% +41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼50% +29%
Blackview P2
3667 Points ∼43% +11%
Blackview R6
2759 Points ∼32% -17%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼52% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼71% +82%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
632 Points ∼37%
Lenovo Moto C
534 Points ∼31% -16%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼33% -12%
Nokia 3
575 Points ∼34% -9%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼36% -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼32% -13%
Blackview P2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview R6
10 Points ∼1% -98%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% +83%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
209 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto C
177 Points ∼2% -15%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼2% 0%
Nokia 3
211 Points ∼2% +1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +109%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼3% +50%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼7% +197%
Blackview R6
383 Points ∼4% +83%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼7% +219%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +2817%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
501 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto C
419 Points ∼9% -16%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼14% +22%
Nokia 3
703 Points ∼16% +40%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% +48%
Blackview P2
831 Points ∼19% +66%
Blackview R6
472 Points ∼11% -6%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +99%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +507%
System (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1048 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto C
883 Points ∼9% -16%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼11% +12%
Nokia 3
1081 Points ∼11% +3%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼12% +14%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼10% -1%
Blackview P2
1623 Points ∼16% +55%
Blackview R6
562 Points ∼5% -46%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼21% +103%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% +414%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
513 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Moto C
432 Points ∼11% -16%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼14% +5%
Nokia 3
551 Points ∼15% +7%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% +18%
Blackview P2
298 Points ∼8% -42%
Blackview R6
177 Points ∼5% -65%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% +539%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor)
Nokia 3
1045 Points ∼12%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14%
Blackview P2
1633 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼99%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1526 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto C
1254 Points ∼5% -18%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼6% +5%
Nokia 3
1520 Points ∼6% 0%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼7% +14%
Blackview P2
2463 Points ∼10% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27% +340%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
532 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto C
450 Points ∼8% -15%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼10% +9%
Nokia 3
556 Points ∼9% +5%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼11% +21%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼10% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +275%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
7825 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto C
7209 Points ∼10% -8%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼11% +5%
Nokia 3
7925 Points ∼11% +1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% +18%
Blackview P2
9612 Points ∼13% +23%
Blackview R6
7424 Points ∼10% -5%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼17% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30% +175%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3226 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C
2706 Points ∼1% -16%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼1% -2%
Nokia 3
3177 Points ∼1% -2%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% +20%
Blackview P2
9604 Points ∼2% +198%
Blackview R6
5380 Points ∼1% +67%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +229%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% +1027%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3711 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto C
3142 Points ∼2% -15%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼2% -1%
Nokia 3
3665 Points ∼2% -1%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% +19%
Blackview P2
9496 Points ∼5% +156%
Blackview R6
5731 Points ∼3% +54%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% +750%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
10 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C
5.1 fps ∼0% -49%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼0% -40%
Nokia 3
6 fps ∼0% -40%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -66%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -48%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼1% +60%
Blackview R6
9.8 fps ∼1% -2%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9% +1110%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
6 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C
13 fps ∼3% +117%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼2% +83%
Nokia 3
10 fps ∼2% +67%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% +60%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼3% +167%
Blackview R6
9.7 fps ∼2% +62%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% +183%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% +900%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4.5 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C
1.6 fps ∼0% -64%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼0% -51%
Nokia 3
2.2 fps ∼0% -51%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -71%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -60%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼1% +49%
Blackview R6
4 fps ∼1% -11%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +58%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +1278%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2.2 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C
7.8 fps ∼2% +255%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼1% +118%
Nokia 3
4.5 fps ∼1% +105%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% +68%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% +86%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼2% +205%
Blackview R6
4 fps ∼1% +82%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼2% +223%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% +1764%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1.4 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto C
5.5 fps ∼1% +293%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Nokia 3
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼1% +214%
Blackview R6
2.5 fps ∼1% +79%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1% +236%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6% +1614%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3.2 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto C
1.2 fps ∼1% -62%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%
Nokia 3
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼3% +38%
Blackview R6
2.6 fps ∼1% -19%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% +619%

Leyenda

 
Lenovo Moto C Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R6 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼100% +351%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
25.502 Points ∼39% +75%
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55)
21.904 Points ∼33% +50%
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
20.482 Points ∼31% +40%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
17.124 Points ∼26% +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
17.094 Points ∼26% +17%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
14.602 Points ∼22%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.342 Points ∼22% -2%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
13.97 Points ∼21% -4%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
11.676 Points ∼18% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼100% +476%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
4231 Points ∼33% +88%
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55)
3195 Points ∼25% +42%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
3052 Points ∼24% +36%
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
2838 Points ∼22% +26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
2773 Points ∼21% +23%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points ∼18% +2%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
2269 Points ∼18% +1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
2247 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
1730 Points ∼13% -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
19879.3 ms * ∼100% -22%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
16759 ms * ∼84% -3%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16722.7 ms * ∼84% -3%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
16237.6 ms * ∼82%
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
13174 ms * ∼66% +19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
12952.9 ms * ∼65% +20%
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55)
11226.6 ms * ∼56% +31%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
10742 ms * ∼54% +34%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
9795.6 ms * ∼49% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼9% +88%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Lenovo Moto C PlusLenovo Moto CGigaset GS170Nokia 3LG K8 2017Lenovo Moto G4 PlayBlackview P2Blackview R6UMI MaxSamsung Galaxy S8
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
42%
129%
186%
137%
77%
23%
59%
339%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.7
10.7
0%
21.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
99%
62.9
488%
52.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
388%
51.1
378%
19.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83%
9.34 (Hama 32GB Class10)
-13%
18.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
69%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
400%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
13.5
13.5
0%
37.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
177%
64.3
376%
78.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
482%
65.5
385%
34.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
154%
22.74 (Hama 32GB Class10)
68%
36.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
171%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
373%
Random Write 4KB
15.4
10.9
-29%
10.45
-32%
5.5
-64%
12.5
-19%
28.31
84%
9.54
-38%
13.5
-12%
10.91
-29%
15.25
-1%
Random Read 4KB
18.1
18.37
1%
18.34
1%
17.7
-2%
41.6
130%
17.9
-1%
22.07
22%
18.73
3%
26.66
47%
127.17
603%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.45
44.55
0%
44.79
1%
34
-24%
84.6
90%
43.95
-1%
133.84
201%
76.11
71%
69.5
56%
193.23
335%
Sequential Read 256KB
186.69
179.28
-4%
197.86
6%
181
-3%
270.8
45%
144.12
-23%
264.78
42%
228
22%
257.9
38%
792.86
325%
Carga Máx.
 31.6 °C30.6 °C30.6 °C 
 32.6 °C30.9 °C30.6 °C 
 32.3 °C30.5 °C30.6 °C 
Máximo: 32.6 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C
28.6 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C
29.2 °C29 °C28.9 °C
29 °C29 °C28.9 °C
Máximo: 29.2 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C
Conector de corriente  33 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.530.830.52528.330.428.33128.929.828.94038.932.738.95027.430.927.46326.128.726.18025.132.125.11002734.12712533.528.833.516023.823.723.820029.121.129.125035.52035.531544.819.644.840052.52252.550059.723.659.763066.318.466.380071.717.871.7100075.218.775.2125074.417.674.4160074.316.374.3200072.516.572.5250071.916.471.9315072.116.272.1400071.416.171.4500072.71672.7630073.416.273.4800076.516.176.51000072.41672.41250066.515.866.51600051.515.951.5SPL84.829.984.8N60.21.460.2median 71.4Lenovo Moto C Plusmedian 17.6median 71.4Delta13.72.913.731.633.225.433.925.331.632.925.633.629.531.622.828.427.22727.420.824.1222321.322.720.827.421.235.219.446.119.554.417.759.917.966.917.874.717.376.617.475.916.772.717.27218.270.117.973.117.673.117.772.717.873.517.973.318.166.118.263.83084.41.357.3median 17.9Gigaset GS170median 66.91.315.131.644.425.43425.335.932.931.733.630.931.637.828.424.92726.320.827.42225.421.325.620.826.521.229.619.437.119.545.217.754.417.965.517.876.617.378.917.477.716.774.417.273.418.272.417.97017.668.517.768.517.871.917.969.518.163.818.255.93085.61.355median 17.9LG K8 2017median 65.51.317.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto C Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Gigaset GS170 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG K8 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.08 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.87 / 1.89 Watt
Carga midlight 2.18 / 3.61 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Blackview R6
3000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-1%
3%
-2%
-3%
-36%
-66%
-2%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.54
32%
0.67
16%
0.65
19%
0.68
15%
0.99
-24%
0.78
2%
1.02
-28%
0.78
2%
Idle Average *
1.87
1.56
17%
1.35
28%
1.6
14%
1.58
16%
2.04
-9%
1.63
13%
1.53
18%
1.1
41%
Idle Maximum *
1.89
1.6
15%
1.39
26%
1.62
14%
1.61
15%
2.12
-12%
1.84
3%
1.62
14%
1.16
39%
Load Average *
2.18
3.18
-46%
3.1
-42%
2.97
-36%
3.36
-54%
3.77
-73%
7.47
-243%
2.91
-33%
4.15
-90%
Load Maximum *
3.61
4.42
-22%
4.02
-11%
4.34
-20%
3.91
-8%
5.78
-60%
7.47
-107%
2.93
19%
5.12
-42%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
14h 18min
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Blackview R6
3000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
858
517
-40%
442
-48%
552
-36%
594
-31%
630
-27%
1083
26%
604
-30%
588
-31%
719
-16%

Pro

+ Brillo del panel IPS
+ Dual-SIM
+ Ampliable por tarjeta SD
+ Calibración del display
+ Aguante de la batería
+ Temperatura

Contra

- 1 GB RAM
- SoC débil
- Memoria eMMC lenta
En análisis: Lenovo Moto C Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Lenovo Alemania.
En análisis: Lenovo Moto C Plus. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Lenovo Alemania.

En comparación con el Moto C, Lenovo ha hecho los ajustes adecuados para el Moto C Plus. Está un nivel por encima de su equivalente de 5" sin el "Plus"adicional. El rendimiento del sistema y del navegador también ha mejorado un poco gracias al MediaTek SoC.

Pero teniendo en cuenta su precio, el Moto C Plus todavía no ofrece un gran paquete de rendimiento de CPU, GPU y los valores de acceso al almacenamiento. Sin embargo, el smartphone básico puede marcar algunos puntos con su largo aguante de la batería, cámara decente y Android 7.0 actualizado. El panel IPS 720-p tiene una alta luminosidad, un buen contraste y una buena visualización de color.

Lenovo ha facilitado bastante a los compradores potenciales elegir entre los dos modelos de Moto. Debido a la mínima diferencia en el precio, la versión Plus es definitivamente la elección correcta.


Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo Moto C Plus - 08/29/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
81%
Teclado
64 / 75 → 85%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
34 / 60 → 56%
Peso
91%
Battería
97%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
9 / 63 → 14%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Cámara
61%
Médio
68%
80%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto C Plus
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-08-30 (Update: 2017-08-30)