Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Gigaset GS170

Marcus Herbrich (traducido por Francisco García), 08/13/2017

Vuelta al inicio.Hace unos años, los smartphones con una batería extraíble eran muy comunes. Hoy en día tales dispositivos son bastante raros. El nuevo smartphone básico del fabricante alemán Gigaset tiene esta característica. Puedes averiguar en nuestra análisis exhaustivo, cómo se equipara el GS170 contra la fuerte competencia.

Gigaset GS170 (GS Serie)
Procesador
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
2048 MB 
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixels 294 PPI, capacitiva, multitoque, LCD, IPS, Curva 2.5D , lustroso: si
Disco duro
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.25 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: puerto de audio de 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de hasta 128GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor posición, sensor de proximidad, status LED
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM / 2G: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz, UMTS / 3G: 900 / 2100 MHz, FDD / LTE / 4G: 800 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.5 x 144 x 72.3
Battería
9.5 Wh, 2500 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable, 3.8 V, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 630 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 31 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix lente de 5 capas (para imágenes más nítidas), resolución (foto): 13 MP auto-foco, apertura: f2.2, flash de luz LED
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, 1 cargador, 1 adaptador de tarjetaSIM (Nano a Micro), 1 cable USB, 1 batería de 2500 mAh Li-Ion, UI Gigaset , 24 Meses Garantía, Valor SAR: 0,56 w/kg (cabeza), fanless
Peso
139 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 32 g
Precio
149 Euros

 

Case

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼100% +698%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼26% +109%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼20% +59%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼13% +2%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼12% -1%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.5 MBit/s ∼11% -10%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
33.5 MBit/s ∼9% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼100% +1181%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼15% +98%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 MBit/s ∼15% +97%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼8% +7%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼8%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 MBit/s ∼8% -3%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 MBit/s ∼8% -3%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼7% -4%
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Gigaset GS170
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
403
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 432 cd/m² Médio: 417.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.56 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 418 cd/m²
Contraste: 929:1 (Negro: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo C2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Coolpad Modena 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview P2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
5%
16%
23%
13%
31%
3%
42%
-5%
40%
41%
Brightness
418
479
15%
414
-1%
449
7%
524
25%
302
-28%
468
12%
498
19%
315
-25%
420
0%
472
13%
Brightness Distribution
92
95
3%
94
2%
92
0%
94
2%
79
-14%
86
-7%
86
-7%
87
-5%
85
-8%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.45
0.55
-22%
0.42
7%
0.35
22%
0.62
-38%
0.15
67%
0.63
-40%
0.23
49%
0.56
-24%
0.15
67%
0.33
27%
Contrast
929
889
-4%
981
6%
1309
41%
852
-8%
2080
124%
765
-18%
2270
144%
557
-40%
2827
204%
1461
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.7
8.3
14%
5.6
42%
6.5
33%
5.2
46%
8.2
15%
6.5
33%
6.9
29%
6.8
30%
9.5
2%
3.2
67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.3
8.7
23%
6.9
39%
7.7
32%
5.7
50%
9.2
19%
7.3
35%
9.2
19%
7.1
37%
14.5
-28%
2.2
81%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.08 115%
2.4 100%
2.15 112%
1.99 121%
2.29 105%
1.91 126%
2.38 101%
2.77 87%
2.28 105%
2.22 108%
CCT
10414 62%
9034 72%
8422 77%
8518 76%
6631 98%
9017 72%
7249 90%
8687 75%
7402 88%
10840 60%
6581 99%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 57 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 6285 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
19.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 7.6 ms subida
↘ 11.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 12 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (26.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
37.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19.2 ms subida
↘ 18 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (42.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
Viewing angles
Viewing angles
Viewing angles
Viewing angles
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points ∼13%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% -6%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼10% -21%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼11% -17%
Lenovo C2
23825 Points ∼10% -21%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼11% -19%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +63%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼16% +23%
Blackview P2
41852 Points ∼18% +39%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% +481%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼38%
ZTE Blade A510
2109 Points ∼31% -19%
Blackview P2
2782 Points ∼41% +7%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼100% +163%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼40%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -23%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼38% -7%
Lenovo C2
1908 Points ∼23% -43%
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points ∼32% -20%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼54% +34%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼49% +22%
Blackview P2
3667 Points ∼44% +10%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +148%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼36%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -98%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% +6%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼37% +1%
Lenovo C2
9 Points ∼1% -98%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼1% -98%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Blackview P2
9 Points ∼1% -98%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼79% +119%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼2%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -17%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼2% -15%
Lenovo C2
177 Points ∼2% -16%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼2% -17%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8% +217%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +106%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼7% +195%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼69% +2746%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼14%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% -19%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼11% -20%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼14% -2%
Lenovo C2
332 Points ∼8% -46%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼6% -53%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +64%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼18% +31%
Blackview P2
831 Points ∼19% +36%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% +242%
System (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼18%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -32%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼14% -22%
Lenovo C2
826 Points ∼13% -29%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼13% -29%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32% +81%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26% +45%
Blackview P2
1623 Points ∼25% +39%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼85% +376%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼14%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -67%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼12% -17%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼13% -10%
Lenovo C2
147 Points ∼4% -73%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼4% -74%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% -37%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼7% -49%
Blackview P2
298 Points ∼8% -45%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% +464%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview P2
1633 Points ∼19%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼98%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼9%
Blackview P2
2463 Points ∼13% +54%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼35% +304%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼12%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼13% +7%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼39% +228%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
772 Points ∼26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points ∼20% -21%
UMI Max
1247 Points ∼41% +62%
Ulefone Metal
1084 Points ∼36% +40%
Blackview P2
1055 Points ∼35% +37%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼94% +268%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
74 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points ∼1% -12%
UMI Max
354 Points ∼7% +378%
Ulefone Metal
158 Points ∼3% +114%
Blackview P2
328 Points ∼6% +343%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% +5147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
93 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points ∼2% -13%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0% -100%
UMI Max
421 Points ∼11% +353%
Ulefone Metal
195 Points ∼5% +110%
Blackview P2
387 Points ∼10% +316%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% +3760%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
781 Points ∼26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼21% -21%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼21% -20%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼41% +59%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼35% +35%
Blackview P2
1030 Points ∼34% +32%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼94% +263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
227 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -56%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1% -53%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7% +130%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼3% +7%
Blackview P2
482 Points ∼6% +112%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% +2489%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
152 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -18%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼3% -14%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0% -100%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12% +293%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼6% +93%
Blackview P2
546 Points ∼11% +259%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% +3021%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼11%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -14%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼10% -14%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼10% -14%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼17% +50%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼14% +27%
Blackview P2
9612 Points ∼13% +18%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% +146%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼1%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% +4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -16%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1% -12%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1% -15%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +235%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +104%
Blackview P2
9604 Points ∼2% +203%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +1660%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼2%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% +3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -16%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼2% -12%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0% -100%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼2% -15%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +198%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +93%
Blackview P2
9496 Points ∼5% +159%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% +991%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼0%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -18%
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps ∼0% -17%
Lenovo C2
5 fps ∼0% -17%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0% -18%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +183%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +217%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼1% +167%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% +1417%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼2%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -25%
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps ∼2% -19%
Lenovo C2
8.5 fps ∼2% -23%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼2% -23%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% +55%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% +9%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼3% +45%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% +427%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼0%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% -5%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% +55%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
Lenovo C2
fps ∼0% -100%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +223%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% +32%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼1% +205%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% +2218%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼1%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% -2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼0% -62%
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps ∼1% -17%
Lenovo C2
3.7 fps ∼1% -23%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1% -27%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼2% +48%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2% +33%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼2% +40%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% +504%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼0%
Gigaset GS160
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% +79%
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps ∼1% +107%
Lenovo C2
1.2 fps ∼0% -14%
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ∼0% -21%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1% +236%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼2% +536%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼1% +214%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% +2257%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼2%
Gigaset GS160
3.4 fps ∼2% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
Lenovo C2
2.7 fps ∼2% -21%
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ∼1% -26%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% +38%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3% +32%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼3% +29%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% +341%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼1%
Blackview P2
2.3 fps ∼1%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max
2.5 fps ∼0%
Blackview P2
2.3 fps ∼0%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0%

Leyenda

 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HTC U11
69.51 Points ∼100% +385%
UMI Max
25.502 Points ∼37% +78%
Blackview P2
20.482 Points ∼29% +43%
Ulefone Metal
17.831 Points ∼26% +24%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼25% +19%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼21% +1%
Gigaset GS170
14.342 Points ∼21%
Lenovo C2
13.502 Points ∼19% -6%
Coolpad Modena 2
13.15 Points ∼19% -8%
ZTE Blade A510
12.784 Points ∼18% -11%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼18% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HTC U11
11781 Points ∼100% +416%
UMI Max
4231 Points ∼36% +85%
Blackview P2
2838 Points ∼24% +24%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼24% +21%
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points ∼23% +20%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼21% +9%
Gigaset GS170
2284 Points ∼19%
Lenovo C2
2159 Points ∼18% -5%
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points ∼18% -8%
Coolpad Modena 2
1975 Points ∼17% -14%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼16% -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Coolpad Modena 2
19647.2 ms * ∼100% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼98% -15%
ZTE Blade A510
17364.1 ms * ∼88% -4%
Gigaset GS170
16722.7 ms * ∼85%
Lenovo C2
16585 ms * ∼84% +1%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼71% +17%
Ulefone Metal
13397.3 ms * ∼68% +20%
Blackview P2
13174 ms * ∼67% +21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼66% +23%
UMI Max
9795.6 ms * ∼50% +41%
HTC U11
2760.3 ms * ∼14% +83%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Gigaset GS170Gigaset GS160Lenovo Moto G4 PlayLenovo C2ZTE Blade A510ZTE Blade V7 LiteCoolpad Modena 2UMI MaxUlefone MetalBlackview P2HTC U11
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
59%
-43%
-43%
-8%
-10%
20%
11%
38%
315%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
21.34
19.19
-10%
51.1
139%
16.1
-25%
16.5
-23%
12.62
-41%
18.25
-14%
18.07
-15%
27.6
29%
19.61
-8%
46.25
117%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
37.41
30.71
-18%
65.5
75%
24.2
-35%
25.55
-32%
22.77
-39%
35.59
-5%
36.64
-2%
49.6
33%
34.26
-8%
68.82
84%
Random Write 4KB
10.45
6.8
-35%
28.31
171%
4.7
-55%
4.69
-55%
8.26
-21%
6.79
-35%
10.91
4%
7.87
-25%
9.54
-9%
79.97
665%
Random Read 4KB
18.34
18.5
1%
17.9
-2%
14.5
-21%
14.03
-24%
18.24
-1%
23.03
26%
26.66
45%
22.18
21%
22.07
20%
91.45
399%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.79
46.6
4%
43.95
-2%
8
-82%
9.94
-78%
70.33
57%
42.56
-5%
69.5
55%
39.91
-11%
133.84
199%
206.41
361%
Sequential Read 256KB
197.86
200.5
1%
144.12
-27%
120.7
-39%
111.91
-43%
187.34
-5%
147.04
-26%
257.9
30%
228.84
16%
264.78
34%
717.33
263%
Carga Máx.
 36.1 °C36 °C35.7 °C 
 37 °C35.1 °C36.4 °C 
 37.3 °C36.7 °C35.7 °C 
Máximo: 37.3 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C
32.9 °C32.8 °C33.9 °C
33 °C32.9 °C36.6 °C
32.9 °C32.7 °C37.8 °C
Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 33.9 °C
Conector de corriente  33.7 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.633.22525.433.93125.331.64032.925.65033.629.56331.622.88028.427.21002727.412520.824.1160222320021.322.725020.827.431521.235.240019.446.150019.554.463017.759.980017.966.9100017.874.7125017.376.6160017.475.9200016.772.7250017.272315018.270.1400017.973.1500017.673.1630017.772.7800017.873.51000017.973.31250018.166.11600018.263.8SPL3084.4N1.357.3median 17.9Gigaset GS170median 66.9Delta1.315.131.644.525.435.225.336.532.932.133.641.231.631.628.435.32727.520.8242226.121.325.220.829.421.239.119.444.119.552.817.759.917.965.517.869.417.370.317.470.116.769.117.268.418.272.617.976.917.668.917.765.617.869.217.964.418.152.718.249.23082.41.348.5median 17.9UMI Maxmedian 64.41.314.217.919.719.617.919.618.619.519.617.617.521.317.62019.223.22017.715.620.717.715.516.621.915.517.218.214.417.218.120.315.918.128.930.425.328.91424.611.81414.929.511.914.916.432.413.516.418.934.214.718.922.238.813.422.225.843.914.425.83046.910.63036.853.1836.84056.98.94039.856.39.839.83956.183936.952.68.136.936.553.66.536.535.453.86.435.437.756.46.237.74058.15.74044595.74443.658.65.743.638.6545.838.63246.15.8322437.25.62451.167.620.851.17.121.20.37.1median 35.4Lenovo Moto G4 Playmedian 52.6median 8.1median 35.4810.33.68hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigaset GS170 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.43 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Frequency comparison (Checkboxes selectable!)

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.29 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.54 / 1.56 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 3.18 / 4.42 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-14%
-4%
-3%
-19%
5%
-30%
-9%
-84%
-39%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
0.54
0.56
-4%
0.68
-26%
0.71
-31%
0.61
-13%
0.63
-17%
0.64
-19%
1.02
-89%
1.41
-161%
0.99
-83%
0.73
-35%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.7
-9%
1.58
-1%
1.62
-4%
1.75
-12%
1.37
12%
1.96
-26%
1.53
2%
2.46
-58%
2.04
-31%
1.96
-26%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.75
-9%
1.61
-1%
1.64
-3%
1.83
-14%
1.71
-7%
1.98
-24%
1.62
-1%
2.83
-77%
2.12
-33%
1.98
-24%
Load Average *
3.18
4.17
-31%
3.36
-6%
3.24
-2%
4.49
-41%
2.82
11%
4.99
-57%
2.91
8%
5.15
-62%
3.77
-19%
4.82
-52%
Load Maximum *
4.42
5.07
-15%
3.91
12%
3.36
24%
5.14
-16%
3.36
24%
5.48
-24%
2.93
34%
7.05
-60%
5.78
-31%
7.15
-62%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
7h 22min
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3
442
615
39%
630
43%
662
50%
416
-6%
517
17%
518
17%
588
33%
403
-9%
1083
145%
560
27%

Pro

+ Módulo GPS muy preciso
+ Buen panel IPS
+ Mano de obra sólida con batería extraíble
+ Android fino
+ Expansión de doble tarjeta SIM + tarjeta SD

Contra

-
- Calibración de la pantalla
- Hardware débil
- Rendimiento del sistema mediocre
- altavoz
- Sensación de la superficie

Verdict

En análisis: Gigaset GS170. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de by Gigaset Alemania.
En análisis: Gigaset GS170. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de by Gigaset Alemania.

El fabricante de Munich ofrece una mejora cuidadosa a su serie de GS. Básicamente, el GS170 técnicamente es una versión  ligeramente mejorada de su predecesor, ya que visualmente los dispositivos parecen sólo mínimamente diferentes, si es que lo son.

El nuevo dispositivo básico de Gigaset sigue sumando puntos con una batería extraíble y la función de dual-SIM, sin perder la capacidad de alamcenamiento que ofrece disponer de una tarjeta SD. Además, el GS170 tiene un módulo GPS muy preciso.

Esto se contrasta con algunos motivos de queja: El rendimiento del sistema podría mejorar, el SoC es débil, y el almacenamiento interno eMMC, así como la ranura para tarjetas SD son relativamente lentos. Además, el calibrado de la pantalla es demasiado frío y la calidad del altavoz es, como mucho, apropiada para el rango de precios.

El Gigaset GS170 es un buen avance de su predecesor, incluso si algunas de nuestras quejas siguen siendo válidas. Que si el paquete completo justifica o no el precio de casi 150 euros es al menos dudoso.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Gigaset GS170 - 08/01/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado
82%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Ratón
85%
Conectividad
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Battería
90%
Pantalla
80%
Rendimiento de juegos
6 / 63 → 9%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatura
89%
Ruido
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Cámara
59%
Médio
67%
78%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Gigaset GS170
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-08-13 (Update: 2017-08-13)