Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del portátil Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753

Sebastian Bade (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), 02/05/2017

¡Nada convincente! Este dispositivo multimedia de Dell apunta buenas maneras gracias al buen rendimiento del sistema que proporciona Kaby Lake y una GPU dedicada. Sin embargo, la mediocre pantalla le quita muchos puntos. Veamos como se comporta en las diferentes secciones que analizamos.

Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 (Inspiron 15 5000 Serie)
Adaptador gráfico
AMD Radeon R7 M445 - 4096 MB, Núcleo: 920 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), AMD: Crimson 16.6; Intel: 21.20.16.4526, Intel HD Graphics 620
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, Single-Channel, 2 ranuras, 1 ocupada
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, BOE NT15N41, TN LED, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco duro
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), 256 GB 
, 2.5-inch (7 mm), 180 GB libre
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: Combo de auriculares/micrófono, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Noble Security
Equipamento de red
Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller GigaBit (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVD+-RW GU90N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 23.3 x 390 x 259
Battería
42 Wh, 3500 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Adaptador de corriente, McAfee LiveSafe, suscripción de 12 meses, 30 días de prueba de Microsoft Office, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.295 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 352 g
Precio
719 Euros

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
67.3 MB/s ∼100% +190%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
59 MB/s ∼88% +154%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
57.36 MB/s ∼85% +147%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
57.3 MB/s ∼85% +147%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
52.6 MB/s ∼78% +127%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
23.2 MB/s ∼34%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
19 MB/s ∼28% -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
85.3 MB/s ∼100% +210%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
81.04 MB/s ∼95% +195%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
80.9 MB/s ∼95% +194%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
27.5 MB/s ∼32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
24.9 MB/s ∼29% -9%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
20.5 MB/s ∼24% -25%
152
cd/m²
150
cd/m²
144
cd/m²
144
cd/m²
145
cd/m²
137
cd/m²
149
cd/m²
138
cd/m²
139
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 152 cd/m² Médio: 144.2 cd/m² Minimum: 11.3 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 187 cd/m²
Contraste: 296:1 (Negro: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.27 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 12.28 | - Ø
55% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.03
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
BOE NT15N41, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
N140HCA-EAB, 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Chi Mei, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Chi Mei CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-31%
-95%
-56%
-30%
-55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (18, 25)
39 (21, 18)
9%
51 (18, 33)
-19%
40.8 (22, 18.8)
5%
41 (19, 22)
5%
41 (16, 25)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
14 (6, 8)
24 (19, 5)
-71%
38 (8, 30)
-171%
30.4 (8.4, 22)
-117%
23 (10, 13)
-64%
30 (8, 22)
-114%
PWM Frequency
50 (10)
200 (90)
Screen
11%
76%
39%
17%
44%
Brightness
144
169
17%
265
84%
231
60%
228
58%
285
98%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
86
-4%
89
-1%
89
-1%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.49
0.47
4%
0.23
53%
0.37
24%
0.49
-0%
0.61
-24%
Contrast
296
374
26%
1265
327%
659
123%
490
66%
472
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.27
8.83
5%
4.78
48%
6.41
31%
10.96
-18%
4.56
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.28
8.97
27%
3.49
72%
5.94
52%
11.34
8%
4.95
60%
Gamma
2.03 118%
2.43 99%
2.58 93%
2.28 105%
2.27 106%
2.48 97%
CCT
10732 61%
10234 64%
6013 108%
6101 107%
12292 53%
7669 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
36.8
5%
40
14%
39.3
12%
39
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
57.3
4%
64
16%
61.1
11%
60
9%
93
69%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-10% / 3%
-10% / 42%
-9% / 20%
-7% / 7%
-6% / 22%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Grayscale
Grayscale
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Saturation Sweeps
Saturation Sweeps

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
14 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 8 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (26.6 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
43 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 18 ms subida
↘ 25 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.5 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8586 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Viewing angles Dell Inspiron 15 5000
Viewing angles Dell Inspiron 15 5000
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
LatencyMon
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points ∼74% +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
142 Points ∼71%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼65% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼65% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼65% -9%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
75 Points ∼38% -47%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼16% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼16%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% -2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% -2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
215 Points ∼10% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.66 Points ∼73%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼65% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼65% -11%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼65% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
0.87 Points ∼38% -48%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.75 Points ∼2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼2% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼2% -1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.69 Points ∼2% -2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2.59 Points ∼1% -31%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
7111 Points ∼57%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6496 Points ∼53% -9%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
15362 Points ∼38%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
14471 Points ∼35% -6%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
244.58 Points ∼0% +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
233.11 Points ∼0%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
220.75 Points ∼0% -5%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
213.08 Points ∼0% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
207.21 Points ∼0% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
127.57 Points ∼0% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
36101 Points ∼73%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
32356 Points ∼65% -10%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
32288 Points ∼65% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
32242 Points ∼65% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
18921 Points ∼38% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2098.3 ms * ∼4% -100%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1186.7 ms * ∼2% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1163.8 ms * ∼2% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1139.5 ms * ∼2% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
1050.8 ms * ∼2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7760
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12161
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5624
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7861 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
15362 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7111 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
41.81 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
338 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
142 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
45.91 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 7
PCMark Vantage
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
5033 Points ∼77%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4642 Points ∼71% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points ∼62% -20%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3883 Points ∼60% -23%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4862 Points ∼52%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4429 Points ∼48% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4389 Points ∼47% -10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3696 Points ∼40% -24%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3569 Points ∼38% -27%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3978 Points ∼67%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points ∼63% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3546 Points ∼59% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼53% -21%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3102 Points ∼52% -22%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
2904 Points ∼49% -27%
PCMark 7
Entertainment
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4052 Points ∼38%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3654 Points ∼34% -10%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3409 Points ∼32% -16%
Productivity
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4639 Points ∼43%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3953 Points ∼36% -15%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3062 Points ∼28% -34%
Score
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
5650 Points ∼70%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
5035 Points ∼63% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
4340 Points ∼54% -23%
PCMark Vantage Result
15917 puntos
PCMark 7 Score
5650 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3978 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4862 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5033 puntos
ayuda
CrystalDiskInfo
CrystalDiskInfo
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
ATTO
ATTO
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-93%
0%
-1%
-31%
-15%
Write 4k QD32
239.6
0.722
-100%
245.9
3%
178.3
-26%
131.4
-45%
272.7
14%
Read 4k QD32
285.2
0.647
-100%
364.7
28%
276
-3%
125
-56%
145.4
-49%
Write 4k
55.87
0.726
-99%
66.8
20%
78.82
41%
46.55
-17%
86.03
54%
Read 4k
29.25
0.366
-99%
28.68
-2%
35.15
20%
17.04
-42%
11.24
-62%
Write 512
385.7
25.93
-93%
297.9
-23%
291.1
-25%
281.2
-27%
300.3
-22%
Read 512
382.8
29.32
-92%
338.3
-12%
346.4
-10%
261.9
-32%
290.2
-24%
Write Seq
458.1
85.61
-81%
431.5
-6%
458.7
0%
316.6
-31%
325.1
-29%
Read Seq
502.2
95.33
-81%
469.2
-7%
476.5
-5%
502.8
0%
500.1
0%
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
Sequential Read: 502.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 458.1 MB/s
512K Read: 382.8 MB/s
512K Write: 385.7 MB/s
4K Read: 29.25 MB/s
4K Write: 55.87 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 285.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 239.6 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver Stresstest
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy Stresstest
3DMark 11
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
 
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +126%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
2209 Points ∼5% +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
1752 Points ∼4% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, Intel Core i7-7500U
1579 Points ∼4%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
1190 Points ∼3% -25%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points ∼14% +133%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
12483 Points ∼8% +30%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, Intel Core i7-7500U
9617 Points ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
9501 Points ∼6% -1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
5953 Points ∼4% -38%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +93%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
3775 Points ∼7% +71%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2556 Points ∼5% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points ∼5% +10%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
2280 Points ∼4% +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, Intel Core i7-7500U
2208 Points ∼4%
3DMark 03 Standard
25949 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
21189 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard
12657 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
6872 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
2422 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44716 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7092 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1455 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
705 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
530 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
96.8 fps ∼100% +80%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445
53.9 (min: 14.5) fps ∼56%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
53.1 fps ∼55% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
48.6 fps ∼50% -10%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
42.9 fps ∼44% -20%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
42 fps ∼43% -22%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
31.6 fps ∼100% +109%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445
15.1 (min: 14) fps ∼48%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
13.9 fps ∼44% -8%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
11.9 fps ∼38% -21%
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
78.6 fps ∼100% +58%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445
49.6 (min: 45) fps ∼63%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
46.7 fps ∼59% -6%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
37.2 fps ∼47% -25%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
36.9 fps ∼47% -26%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 98.753.944.513.8fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 74.349.632.711.7fps
Sims 4 (2014) 132.966.928.827.4fps
GTA V (2015) 50.743.712.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 30.818.29.64.7fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 64.437.820.113.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 29.615.18.56.7fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 22.87.95.24.9fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 271210fps
The Division (2016) 32.424.59.66.7fps
Doom (2016) 352814fps
Overwatch (2016) 75.352.623.514.1fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 21147fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 61.859.734.629.4fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 40281312fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 64.242.916.910fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 57411716fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 272416fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 23.418.612.29.9fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 30.224.111.5fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 55.324.113.9fps
The cooling solution consists of a heat pipe and a fan.
The cooling solution consists of ...
The cooling solution consists of a heat pipe and a fan.
... a heat pipe and a fan.

Ruido

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
DVD
36.9 / dB(A)
Carga
41.9 / 41.8 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Noise
5%
1%
7%
-2%
2%
off / environment *
30.6
28.9
6%
31.6
-3%
29
5%
31.2
-2%
29
5%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
30.8
-1%
32.6
-7%
29
5%
31.7
-4%
31
-1%
Idle Average *
30.6
30.8
-1%
32.6
-7%
29
5%
31.9
-4%
31
-1%
Idle Maximum *
30.6
30.8
-1%
32.6
-7%
29
5%
31.9
-4%
31
-1%
Load Average *
41.9
33.4
20%
35.3
16%
35.6
15%
41
2%
33.8
19%
Load Maximum *
41.8
40.1
4%
37.1
11%
38.5
8%
42.7
-2%
44.8
-7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.235.43834.234.22542.642.14341.242.63144.150.945.543.344.14033.844.83936.533.85036.634.23335.636.66329.72928.528.829.78027.931.932.327.827.910026.827.427.526.426.812525.725.926.325.625.716024.524.725.223.824.520023.424.824.523.623.425022.624.324.722.322.631521.524.324.521.421.540020.824.924.120.720.850020.72322.420.320.763019.424.524.41919.480019.426.325.718.619.4100019.932.231.718.119.9125020.633.533.517.920.6160018.930.93117.818.9200018.531.131.417.618.5250018.833.733.517.618.8315018.331.431.418.118.3400018.327.227.218.118.3500018.426.526.518.318.4630018.525.825.918.518.5800018.524.424.318.418.51000018.521.321.118.518.51250018.419.519.418.318.41600018.419.618.918.318.4SPL31.341.941.930.631.3N1.63.73.61.51.6median 19.4Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753median 25.8median 25.7median 18.5median 19.4Delta1.51.71.71.91.5hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test Prime95
Stress test Prime95
Carga Máx.
 38.1 °C40.6 °C28.5 °C 
 38 °C41.6 °C28 °C 
 27.9 °C27.3 °C24.7 °C 
Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
28.1 °C51.3 °C36.6 °C
26.5 °C36.4 °C37 °C
24.4 °C25.1 °C25.5 °C
Máximo: 51.3 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C
Conector de corriente  54.7 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Heat
-10%
19%
5%
18%
15%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.6
48.1
-16%
38.3
8%
43.8
-5%
33.4
20%
40.3
3%
Maximum Bottom *
51.3
60.8
-19%
36
30%
53
-3%
32.9
36%
46.1
10%
Idle Upper Side *
29.4
30.8
-5%
24.9
15%
25.9
12%
27.7
6%
23.8
19%
Idle Bottom *
32.4
31.9
2%
25.6
21%
27.1
16%
29.4
9%
23.4
28%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Both speakers are located at the front.
Both speakers are ...
Both speakers are located at the front.
... located at the front.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.534.234.5254341.2433145.243.345.24039.836.539.85042.635.642.66334.728.834.78031.627.831.610035.926.435.91253625.63616044.823.844.820046.623.646.625051.422.351.431556.121.456.140058.520.758.550055.720.355.763065.41965.480072.418.672.4100070.318.170.3125064.417.964.4160068.217.868.2200072.317.672.325006717.667315065.918.165.940006918.169500071.118.371.1630064.418.564.4800062.918.462.91000064.518.564.51250065.618.365.6160007118.371SPL80.430.680.4N47.31.547.3median 64.5Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753median 18.5median 64.5Delta7.21.97.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4 / 5.4 / 8.3 Watt
Carga midlight 54 / 55.4 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX,
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Power Consumption
-32%
-2%
10%
-18%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
4
6
-50%
3.9
2%
2.7
32%
5.5
-38%
7.7
-93%
Idle Average *
5.4
8.1
-50%
7.4
-37%
5.5
-2%
8.2
-52%
14
-159%
Idle Maximum *
8.3
9.8
-18%
9.5
-14%
6.5
22%
9.5
-14%
15.1
-82%
Load Average *
54
52.5
3%
41
24%
44.2
18%
44.5
18%
33
39%
Load Maximum *
55.4
81.6
-47%
48
13%
65.2
-18%
58
-5%
54.6
1%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

The battery inside the case.
The battery inside the case.
42-Wh lithium-ion battery
42-Wh lithium-ion battery
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 46min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
6h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 16min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 35min
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería
25%
-34%
48%
-14%
-5%
Reader / Idle
466
767
65%
1043
124%
560
20%
527
13%
H.264
316
460
46%
503
59%
194
-39%
287
-9%
WiFi v1.3
417
451
8%
275
-34%
326
-22%
260
-38%
346
-17%
Load
95
75
-21%
124
31%
95
0%
90
-5%

Pro

+ Carcasa elegante
+ Buena duración de batería
+ SSD
+ Touchpad amplio
+ Teclado resistente
+ Buen rendimiento del sistema
+ Unidad óptica
+ Una ranura de memoria libre
+ Pantalla mate sin PWM

Contra

- Pantalla mediocre (baja iluminación, escasos ángulos de visión)
- Teclado sin iluminación
- Solo dispone de 256 GB de almacenamiento
- Lector SD muy lento
- Tapa sensible (se raya con facilidad)
Análisis: Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebooksbilliger.
Análisis: Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753. Modelo de prueba cedido por Notebooksbilliger.

El Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 es un portátil multimedia con un diseño sencillo. Sin embargo la superficie brillante de la tapa puede tener problemas con rayazos no deseados, lo que hará que la apariencia se resienta. Nuestro modelo de prueba de 15.6 pulgadas está equipada con un procesador Kaby Lake moderno y potente. El Core i7-7500U ofrece suficiente rendimiento para tareas multimedia cotidianas y la tarjeta gráfica dedicada asegura que puedas jugar a muchos juegos modernos, a pesar de que no siempre a la máxima resolución. Nuestro dispositivo de prueba está disponible por 719 euros en muchas tiendas online.

El Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 de Dell ofrece buenas cifras de rendimiento en las pruebas y tiene buenos dispositivos de entrada para tareas cotidianas. Sin embargo, la mala pantalla es un inconveniente muy importante. Dell debería cambiarla rápidamente, porque estos paneles TN son cosa del pasado.

La elección de la solución de almacenamiento depende de cuanto necesites. Podrías tener un problema si quieres jugar a varios juegos, y tendría sentido hacerse con un SSD de mayor capacidad. Esto es posible extrayendo la parte inferior, aunque resulta un proceso un poco complicado.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 - 01/30/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
91%
Ratón
95%
Conectividad
49 / 81 → 60%
Peso
61 / 67 → 87%
Battería
85%
Pantalla
71%
Rendimiento de juegos
63 / 85 → 74%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
90%
Ruido
87 / 95 → 91%
Audio
48%
Cámara
46 / 85 → 54%
Médio
74%
81%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Sebastian Bade, 2017-02- 5 (Update: 2017-02- 5)