Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del smartphone Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Daniel Schmidt (traducido por Francisco García), 11/30/2017

Mazacote mainstream. Además del tamaño de la pantalla, el Huawei Mate 10 Lite no tiene mucho en común con su homónimo, el Mate 10 Pro. El Lite cuesta menos de la mitad que el Pro y es un smartphone de gama media muy atractivo. Nuestra análisis exhaustivo revelará no solo sus puntos fuertes sino también sus defectos.

Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Mate Serie)
Procesador
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Adaptador gráfico
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.9 pulgadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels 409 PPI, FullView, IPS, lustroso: si
Disco duro
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.49 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: kombinierte Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonklinke, Card Reader: microSD bis zu 128 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Annährungs- und Beschleunigungssensor, Kompass, Power Delivery, OTG,
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 5 und 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 und 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.5 x 156.2 x 75.2
Battería
3340 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix + 2 MPix (Autofokus, PDAF, Panorama-Modus, HDR, Full-HD-Video)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (Full-HD-Video)
Características adicionales
Teclado: virtuell, Netzteil, USB-Kabel, Kopfhörer, Schutzhülle, Schnellstartanleitung, EMUI 5.1, 24 Meses Garantía, fanless
Peso
164 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 50 g
Precio
349 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +704%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼84% +575%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼73% +489%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼72% +478%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼64% +411%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼100% +459%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼87% +386%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼56% +213%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼50% +178%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼47% +163%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
466
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 497 cd/m² Médio: 456.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.88 cd/m²
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 1557:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.8-23.34 Ø6.5
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.7
Gamma: 2.15
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
42%
4%
-37%
9%
7%
Brightness
457
542
19%
445
-3%
473
4%
334
-27%
535
17%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
88
-1%
88
-1%
88
-1%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.51
-70%
0.42
-40%
Contrast
1557
2136
37%
898
-42%
1310
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
1.6
68%
5.5
-10%
7.1
-42%
4.6
8%
3.3
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
1.5
75%
7.6
-25%
10.5
-72%
2.8
54%
3.6
41%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.28 105%
2.2 109%
2.28 105%
2.29 105%
2.38 101%
CCT
7961 82%
6422 101%
7454 87%
8951 73%
6612 98%
7226 90%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 54 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8582 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 12.4 ms subida
↘ 15.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.5 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
43.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 19.6 ms subida
↘ 23.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (42.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
63195 Points ∼28%
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼28% 0%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% +120%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29% +5%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼66% +138%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼54% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼27% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4847 Points ∼47%
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼47% -1%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% +1%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼39% -16%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6024 Points ∼70%
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼73% +4%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼69% -2%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼82% +17%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼58% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼59% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
753 Points ∼44%
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼50% +12%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼48% +7%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼63% +42%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼57% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼39% -12%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
849 Points ∼9%
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼9% -1%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +441%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼11% +19%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼45% +386%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼50% +445%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼17% +80%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1998 Points ∼45%
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼45% +1%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -21%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24% -48%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74% +63%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼34% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% -25%
System (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2983 Points ∼29%
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼29% -1%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼34% +17%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼40% +39%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼32% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼25% -13%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1398 Points ∼37%
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼38% +3%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼35% -6%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼73% +99%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼57% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼37% +1%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3631 Points ∼14%
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼14% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼17% +20%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼26% +80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
914 Points ∼15%
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +2%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +104%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3508 Points ∼13%
Huawei Nova 2
3438 Points ∼12% -2%
HTC U Ultra
3983 Points ∼14% +14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4362 Points ∼16% +24%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼14% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4098 Points ∼15% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
889 Points ∼15%
Huawei Nova 2
887 Points ∼15% 0%
HTC U Ultra
1643 Points ∼28% +85%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
889 Points ∼15% 0%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼22% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
775 Points ∼13% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1527 Points ∼50%
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼54% +9%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼57% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼69% +40%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼74% +50%
ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points ∼58% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼56% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
289 Points ∼5%
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6% +14%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% +732%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% +31%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +868%
ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points ∼47% +775%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
353 Points ∼9%
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼10% +14%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% +530%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼12% +31%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼69% +655%
ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points ∼64% +608%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼21% +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1667 Points ∼54%
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼54% -1%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼53% -1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼69% +28%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼59% +9%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼36% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼57% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
532 Points ∼7%
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼7% -1%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% +616%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% +36%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼39% +462%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +768%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼14% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
627 Points ∼13%
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼12% -1%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% +370%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼17% +35%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼52% +316%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼54% +330%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼23% +84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
11780 Points ∼16%
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼20% +23%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% +81%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼24% +45%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼21% +29%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼28% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼18% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
9936 Points ∼2%
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼3% +18%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% +237%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% +34%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼9% +292%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% +34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
10294 Points ∼5%
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6% +19%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% +188%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% +36%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼15% +181%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12% +127%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼7% +29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1% +19%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% +363%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼2% +44%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼4% +275%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼6% +450%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼2% +113%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼3%
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4% +25%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% +188%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% +38%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +244%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +231%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +106%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
7.3 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1% +8%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% +256%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% +34%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼6% +311%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +434%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +105%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2% +33%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% +243%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% +43%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +318%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +124%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1% 0%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% +150%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼2% +33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼5% +358%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼7% +546%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% +90%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3%
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3% +16%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% +167%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% +40%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +389%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +256%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% +100%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1% 0%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% +417%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% +21%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +417%
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps ∼5% +521%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼0% +15%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% +211%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0% +30%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼0% +493%
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps ∼0% +263%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼0% +93%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼13%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
Medium Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points ∼14%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%

Leyenda

 
Huawei Mate 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼100% +94%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼77% +49%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼76% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼55% +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
30.233 Points ∼52%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
27.692 Points ∼47% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼46% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼100% +100%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼79% +58%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼54% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼51% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
5096 Points ∼50%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
4864 Points ∼48% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼43% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
8863 ms * ∼100% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
8693.6 ms * ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼73% +26%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼47% +52%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼36% +64%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼35% +64%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼100% +7%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼96% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
104 Points ∼94%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
95 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼80% -14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼77% -17%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Huawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A5 2017HTC U UltraBQ Aquaris X ProZTE Axon 7Honor 9
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
64%
15%
74%
49%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
35.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
67.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
91%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
41%
51.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
7%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
14%
78.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
13%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
Random Write 4KB
15.26
12.13
-21%
13.7
-10%
12.07
-21%
16.22
6%
32.7
114%
Random Read 4KB
31.5
22.41
-29%
84.2
167%
37.97
21%
121.07
284%
55.7
77%
Sequential Write 256KB
99.79
77.1
-23%
164.7
65%
139.63
40%
150.92
51%
204
104%
Sequential Read 256KB
286.78
182.03
-37%
423.9
48%
270.46
-6%
406.49
42%
293
2%
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high26 fps
comparado con
Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime TF201 (min)
 3, GeForce ULP (Tegra 3)
15
   ...
Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG
 Z2580, SGX544MP2
23
LG G3
 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
23
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
26
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
 425, Adreno 308
27
Google Nexus 5
 800 MSM8974, Adreno 330
28.5
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ1 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máx.
 34.8 °C33.9 °C34.5 °C 
 34.1 °C34.4 °C35.5 °C 
 33.1 °C33.2 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
29.5 °C30.2 °C31.3 °C
29.7 °C30 °C31.2 °C
30.3 °C31.1 °C31.1 °C
Máximo: 31.3 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C
Conector de corriente  22.8 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.242.62532.941.43137.237.64031.739.65039.637.86328.331.88027.330.610026.931.212526.729.91602432.820020.939.625020.945.831519.549.840018.557.350017.558.463017.559.880015.762.3100015.866.2125016.669160015.870.4200015.472.4250015.574.831501676.4400015.878.350001676.1630016.374.6800016.376.81000016.279.91250016.472.71600016.460.4SPL28.686.5N1.162.1median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Litemedian 66.2Delta2.112.630.929.330.926.229.126.228.627.828.629.832.629.828.826.728.82628.8262424.92424.824.724.830.722.130.729.220.829.236.120.136.141.719.841.748.72148.753.321.753.357.420.557.462.62162.662.118.462.165.71765.767.717.367.766.915.266.970.315.570.371.21571.27314.97378.515.178.581.314.681.373.914.673.973.114.673.17214.6726014.66048.214.648.28628.88657.31.257.3median 62.6HTC U Ultramedian 17median 62.612.2312.231.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.14 / 2.16 Watt
Carga midlight 3.7 / 5.48 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
20%
-38%
6%
-24%
-1%
33%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.78
10%
1
-15%
0.67
23%
1.13
-30%
0.64
26%
0.64
26%
Idle Average *
2.14
1.1
49%
2.41
-13%
1.7
21%
2.25
-5%
0.84
61%
1.36
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.16
1.16
46%
2.46
-14%
1.78
18%
2.3
-6%
0.87
60%
1.4
35%
Load Average *
3.7
4.15
-12%
6.8
-84%
4.42
-19%
4.89
-32%
6.02
-63%
2.53
32%
Load Maximum *
5.48
5.12
7%
8.9
-62%
6.3
-15%
7.99
-46%
10.45
-91%
3.63
34%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
19h 10min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 62)
8h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 22min
Carga (máximo brillo)
3h 43min
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Duración de Batería
94%
15%
36%
20%
15%
Reader / Idle
1150
2418
110%
1568
36%
1840
60%
1735
51%
1399
22%
H.264
502
984
96%
605
21%
644
28%
704
40%
564
12%
WiFi v1.3
520
843
62%
546
5%
730
40%
411
-21%
516
-1%
Load
223
467
109%
214
-4%
254
14%
245
10%
278
25%

Pro

+ carcasa de aluminio de alta calidad
+ dos cámaras duales
+ almacenamiento expandible
+ doble SIM
+ GPS decente
+ rendimiento decente del sistema

Contra

- sin NFC
- sin aptX
- sin ac Wi-Fi
- rendimiento de la GPU pobre
En análisis: Huawei Mate 10 Lite. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Huawei Alemania.
En análisis: Huawei Mate 10 Lite. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Huawei Alemania.

El miembro más pequeño y asequible de la familia Mate 10 resultó ser muy interesante. Desafortunadamente, la competencia en su campo elegido es inmensa, y la única característica diferente del Mate 10 Lite es su pantalla 18:9 de 5,9" con una excelente relación pantalla a cuerpo. Otras características incluyen la tarjeta SIM híbrida, 4 GB de RAM, 64 GB de almacenamiento interno que se puede ampliar a través de microSD y cámaras duales en ambos lados del teléfono. En general, el paquete se siente como una versión más grande de la Nova 2, y nos gustó la cámara frontal Mate 10 Lite mejor que la enorme bestia megapíxel de la anterior.

Aparte de su nombre, el Mate 10 Lite tiene poco en común con la serie Mate en general. Sin embargo, es un smartphone bastante decente.

 El tamaño del panel aparte, el Huawei Mate 10 Lite tiene poco en común con los otros dos miembros de la familia Mate. Carece de NFC, la batería es más pequeña, el SoC es mucho más lento, la configuración de cámara dual de Leica no se ve, aptX para audio de alta resolución no es compatible y en lugar de Super Charge solo admite QuickCharge.

Considerando todo, aun resulta ser un smartphone bastante decente, particularmente para aquellos que prefieren que las pantallas de sus smartphones sean grandes y masivas. Sin embargo, hubiéramos deseado menos compromisos en comparación con sus dos hermanos mayores, y el aguante de la batería podría haber sido un poco mejor.


Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

 

 

Huawei Mate 10 Lite - 11/27/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabado
87%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 96%
Ratón
92%
Conectividad
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
91%
Battería
90%
Pantalla
85%
Rendimiento de juegos
21 / 63 → 33%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
92%
Ruido
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Cámara
75%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del smartphone Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-11-30 (Update: 2017-12- 1)