Notebookcheck

Análisis breve del portátil Gigabyte Sabre 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050)

Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 07/24/2017

Buena jugabilidad por menos de $1000. Gigabyte ha introducido uno de sus mejores portátiles gaming básicos por menos de un grande. Aun así, hay un montón de cosas sobre esta nueva serie de Sabre que los potenciales compradores deben conocer.

Gigabyte Sabre 15G (Sabre Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 16384 MB, Núcleo: 1354 MHz, Memoría: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 375.72
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, PC4-19200, 17-17-17-39, 1300 MHz, mono canal
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB 
, 1 TB Hitachi HGST HTS721010A9E630
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: jack 3.5 mm cascos, jack 3.5 mm micrófono, Card Reader: Lector SD
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 26.9 x 378 x 267
Battería
47 Wh, 4200 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo 2W, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Adaptador AC, disco de drivers, disco PowerDVD, carta de garantía, manual del usuario, FlexiKey, Centro de Control, Sound Blaster Cinema 3, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.495 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 635 g
Precio
1000 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, mDP 1.3, mDP 1.2, HDMI 1.4, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, SD reader
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, mDP 1.3, mDP 1.2, HDMI 1.4, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, SD reader
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
120.5 MB/s ∼100% +53%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
78.76 MB/s ∼65%
Gigabyte Aero 15
78 MB/s ∼65% -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +192%
Gigabyte Aero 15
89 MB/s ∼35% +3%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
86.53 MB/s ∼34%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼100% +170%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
343 MBit/s ∼53% +43%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
240 MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼100% +66%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
341 MBit/s ∼64% +7%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
319 MBit/s ∼60%
255.2
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
259.2
cd/m²
248.4
cd/m²
248.4
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
222.7
cd/m²
237.2
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 259.2 cd/m² Médio: 240.9 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 248.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 828:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | - Ø
57.9% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
IGZO IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-76%
-10%
-29%
-19%
-7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32 (16.4, 15.6)
57.2 (27.2, 30)
-79%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-34%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
-35%
38.8 (20.8, 18)
-21%
37 (16, 21)
-16%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (15.6, 10)
39.2 (23.6, 15.6)
-53%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-25%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-22%
33.6 (18.8, 14.8)
-31%
25 (4, 21)
2%
PWM Frequency
20000 (99)
961.5
-95%
26000 (20)
30%
19230 (99)
-4%
Screen
40%
24%
39%
-1%
27%
Brightness
241
356
48%
316
31%
289
20%
249
3%
311
29%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
90
7%
86
2%
90
7%
85
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.37
-23%
0.36
-20%
0.26
13%
0.48
-60%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
828
1000
21%
889
7%
1169
41%
533
-36%
1033
25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.5
5.3
29%
4.62
38%
3.46
54%
5.9
21%
4.82
36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
4.6
29%
6
8%
2.46
62%
5.6
14%
3.94
39%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.31 104%
2.46 98%
2.38 101%
2.21 109%
2.45 98%
CCT
7852 83%
6284 103%
6761 96%
6915 94%
7250 90%
6877 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
88.3
139%
60
62%
59
59%
44.8
21%
54
46%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.9
100
73%
92
59%
91
57%
70.1
21%
83
43%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-18% / 8%
7% / 15%
5% / 25%
-10% / -6%
10% / 21%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 15.6 ms subida
↘ 10 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 40 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.9 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16.4 ms subida
↘ 15.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 17 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (43 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 20000 Hz99 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 58 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 5559 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼97% +18%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼83%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼82% -1%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼80% -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼74% -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼72% -13%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼68% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼64% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +22%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼36% +5%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points ∼34% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼34%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
721 Points ∼34% -2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼23% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼23% -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼99% +19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼83% 0%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼83% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼83%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼70% -16%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.54 Points ∼70% -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼68% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼66% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼41% +20%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼35% +3%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼34% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼34%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼31% -10%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
6.89 Points ∼29% -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼24% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼22% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +18%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points ∼70% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6107 Points ∼69%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5516 Points ∼62% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼56% -18%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼55% -19%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4720 Points ∼53% -23%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +27%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points ∼46% +3%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22273 Points ∼45%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
20801 Points ∼42% -7%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
19720 Points ∼40% -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -36%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -49%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
217.072 s * ∼3%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.193 s * ∼3% +2%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
205.34 s * ∼2% +5%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +19%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
593.228 Seconds * ∼3% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
549.204 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
535.159 Seconds * ∼2% +3%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +20%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6831
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22273
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6107
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
65.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.84 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
96.13 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5305 Points ∼81% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5290 Points ∼81% +4%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5192 Points ∼80% +3%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
5063 Points ∼78%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4422 Points ∼68% -13%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
8233 Points ∼88% +93%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5362 Points ∼58% +25%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5114 Points ∼55% +20%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4274 Points ∼46%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5065 Points ∼85% +48%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4248 Points ∼71% +24%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4001 Points ∼67% +17%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
3588 Points ∼60% +5%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3431 Points ∼57%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3431 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4274 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5063 puntos
ayuda
CDM 5 (Primary SSD)
CDM 5 (Primary SSD)
CDM 5 (Secondary HDD)
CDM 5 (Secondary HDD)
AS SSD
AS SSD
HD Tune (Secondary HDD)
HD Tune (Secondary HDD)
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
 
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
AS SSD
195%
106%
25%
98%
Copy Game MB/s
323.54
539.5
67%
240.51
-26%
377.83
17%
1072.6
232%
Copy Program MB/s
195.3
411.54
111%
299.45
53%
198.98
2%
351.48
80%
Copy ISO MB/s
446.8
1272.4
185%
1559.86
249%
354.73
-21%
351.13
-21%
Score Total
752
2810
274%
1592
112%
1019
36%
1630
117%
Score Write
234
1022
337%
376
61%
304
30%
514
120%
Score Read
337
1206
258%
852
153%
472
40%
756
124%
Access Time Write *
0.073
0.034
53%
0.031
58%
0.037
49%
0.025
66%
Access Time Read *
0.141
0.034
76%
0.066
53%
0.1
29%
0.367
-160%
4K-64 Write
132.19
788.85
497%
176.44
33%
171.63
30%
272.53
106%
4K-64 Read
257.03
961.61
274%
563.62
119%
383.39
49%
521.36
103%
4K Write
53.75
112.15
109%
124.14
131%
104.01
94%
131.32
144%
4K Read
28.3
41.34
46%
44.75
58%
37.2
31%
44.6
58%
Seq Write
479.79
1206.58
151%
751.8
57%
288.18
-40%
1098.57
129%
Seq Read
515.92
2026.09
293%
2433.42
372%
510.07
-1%
1904.01
269%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Liteonit CV3-8D128
Sequential Read: 515.92 MB/s
Sequential Write: 479.79 MB/s
4K Read: 28.3 MB/s
4K Write: 53.75 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 257.03 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 132.19 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.141 ms
Access Time Write: 0.073 ms
Copy ISO: 446.8 MB/s
Copy Program: 195.3 MB/s
Copy Game: 323.54 MB/s
Score Read: 337 Points
Score Write: 234 Points
Score Total: 752 Points
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2571 Points ∼25% +246%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points ∼23% +210%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
1145 Points ∼11% +54%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
742 Points ∼7%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5441 Points ∼33% +100%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points ∼28% +70%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
3662 Points ∼22% +35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼21% +29%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2716 Points ∼17%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2699 Points ∼16% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼12% -27%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
1657 Points ∼10% -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11453 Points ∼28% +86%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
10349 Points ∼25% +68%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% +56%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7682 Points ∼19% +25%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% +19%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6166 Points ∼15%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6074 Points ∼15% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -33%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% -42%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8876 Points ∼56% +32%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8762 Points ∼55% +31%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼52% +24%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼50% +19%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6707 Points ∼42%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼28% -33%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼26% -39%
1280x720 Performance GPU
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15453 Points ∼30% +100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
13279 Points ∼26% +72%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% +61%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% +27%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7731 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -38%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
7609 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
73178 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20270 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5582 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2702 puntos
ayuda
Batman: Arkham Knight
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
62 fps ∼100% +148%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
52 fps ∼84% +108%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
41 fps ∼66% +64%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
36 fps ∼58% +44%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
33 fps ∼53% +32%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
25 fps ∼40%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
23 fps ∼37% -8%
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
89 fps ∼100% +93%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
76 fps ∼85% +65%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
64 fps ∼72% +39%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
57 fps ∼64% +24%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
48 fps ∼54% +4%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
46 fps ∼52%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
34 fps ∼38% -26%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
66.8 fps ∼100% +95%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
51.6 fps ∼77% +51%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
38 fps ∼57% +11%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
37.1 fps ∼56% +8%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
34.2 fps ∼51%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
32.9 fps ∼49% -4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps ∼36% -29%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
60.4 fps ∼100% +56%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
45 fps ∼75% +17%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
44.6 fps ∼74% +16%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
39.8 fps ∼66% +3%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
38.6 fps ∼64%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
30.2 fps ∼50% -22%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
110 fps ∼100% +80%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
92.4 fps ∼84% +51%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
74 fps ∼67% +21%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
69.7 fps ∼63% +14%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
66 fps ∼60% +8%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
61 fps ∼55%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45 fps ∼41% -26%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 13061fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 7944fps
Thief (2014) 69.242.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 4122fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 784625fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6053.2fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 42.835.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 38.634.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 34.129.4fps
Doom (2016) 4842fps
Overwatch (2016) 59fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 38.3fps
Prey (2017) 62.254.4fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
Prime95 Stress 3.2 -- 96 --
FurMark Stress -- 1152 -- 64
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 2.8 1152 80 63
Witcher 3 Stress 1.0 - 2.8 1696 49 - 55 78

Ruido

Ocioso
33 / 33.3 / 34.7 dB(A)
Carga
44.5 / 52.8 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Noise
4%
4%
4%
7%
1%
off / environment *
28.2
28.4
-1%
31
-10%
30
-6%
28.1
-0%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
33
29
12%
32
3%
30
9%
28.1
15%
34
-3%
Idle Average *
33.3
29
13%
33
1%
33
1%
29.1
13%
35
-5%
Idle Maximum *
34.7
32.2
7%
34
2%
37
-7%
29.1
16%
36
-4%
Load Average *
44.5
47.1
-6%
39
12%
41
8%
49.2
-11%
40
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.2
52
-6%
43
13%
42
15%
Load Maximum *
52.8
47.1
11%
50
5%
50
5%
49.2
7%
46
13%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 43.6 °C27.4 °C37 °C 
 32 °C42 °C36.8 °C 
 27.4 °C30.4 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 34 °C
34.2 °C29.4 °C38 °C
40.2 °C27.4 °C23.4 °C
22.6 °C22.4 °C22 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C
Conector de corriente  46.2 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
Sabre 15 (Red: System idle, Pink: Pink noise)
Sabre 15 (Red: System idle, Pink: Pink noise)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung Odyssey
Samsung Odyssey
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204039.82538.1363137.237.94035.236.45034.136.26333.335.68031.93310032.232.71253132.616030.530.220029.3302502930.43152839.740027.44950026.747.563027.150.380026.753.1100025.959.5125025.865.2160025.772200024.968.6250024.965.4315024.362.5400024.560.3500024.363.2630023.968.6800023.868.61000023.759.31250023.755.91600023.758.9SPL37.477.9N336.1median 25.8Gigabyte Sabre 15Gmedian 58.9Delta1.712.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigabyte Sabre 15G audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Frequency Comparison (Checkbox selectable!)
Graph 1: Pink Noise 100% Vol.; Graph 2: Audio off

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 8 / 10.9 / 11 Watt
Carga midlight 76.7 / 106.4 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-35%
-41%
-78%
3%
-104%
Idle Minimum *
8
11.9
-49%
12
-50%
18
-125%
6.7
16%
20
-150%
Idle Average *
10.9
17.1
-57%
15
-38%
23
-111%
8.9
18%
24
-120%
Idle Maximum *
11
17.3
-57%
20
-82%
30
-173%
10.8
2%
29
-164%
Load Average *
76.7
94.7
-23%
82
-7%
85
-11%
81.8
-7%
82
-7%
Load Maximum *
106.4
122
-15%
161
-51%
158
-48%
122.7
-15%
193
-81%
Witcher 3 ultra *
94.9
104.8
-10%
111
-17%
96
-1%
92.2
3%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
8h 13min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
4h 21min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 17min
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 43 Wh
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Duración de Batería
56%
45%
-23%
8%
-1%
Reader / Idle
493
831
69%
638
29%
256
-48%
612
24%
377
-24%
WiFi v1.3
261
434
66%
422
62%
198
-24%
263
1%
246
-6%
Load
77
103
34%
112
45%
80
4%
76
-1%
98
27%

Pro

+ Pantalla mate limpia; Sin grandes problemas de granulación
+ SATA III +NVMe M.2 de 2,5"
+ Gran rendimiento gaming
+ Relativamente fácil de mantenimiento
+ Buen diseño de la carcasa
+ 3x puertos de salida de video
+ Batería extraíble

Contra

- Moderado sangrado de pantalla; Construcción de la carcása imperfecta
- La tapa podría ser más rígida; Calidad de construcción imperfecta
- Ventiladores del sistema pulsante; Los ventiladores están siempre activos
- Sin Thunderbolt 3; Posicionamiento del puerto
- No puede mantener el modo Turbo Boost de la CPU
- No hay opciones para 120 Hz, 5 ms o G-Sync
- 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM en lugar de 4 GB
- Ventilador muy ruidoso durante los juegos
- Capacidad de la batería pequeña
- Calidad de altavoz deficiente
- 1x1 802.11ac WLAN
- Poca cobertura de espacio de color
En análisis: GIGABYTE Sabre 15G-NE2
En análisis: GIGABYTE Sabre 15G-NE2

  El nuevo Gigabyte Sabre 15  trae muchas características para un portátil gaming básico. El profundo desplazamiento de la tecla de 2 mm, la retroiluminación RGB de tres zonas, puertos de salida de vídeo triples, dobles bahías de almacenamiento y diseño energético son razones convincentes para comprar el Sabre sobre otros portátiles gaming de bajo presupuesto como el Pavilion 15 Power, el Samsung Odyssey o el Asus FX553 en la misma gama de precios. Es la fuerte primera impresión lo que creemos que es clave cuando se introduce un nuevo modelo y serie.  

Todavía hay mucho que mejorar, especialmente en términos de ruido de los ventiladores y el audio. La GTX 1050 es menos potente que la GTX 1050 Ti y la GTX 1060, pero el Sabre 15 genera más ruido que los portátiles con GPUs más potentes. Combine el ruido del ventilador fuerte con la mala reproducción de bajos y tiene una experiencia de sonido instatisfactoria si no lleva un buen par de auriculares. La base es sólida y más firme que en el Asus FX553 y Odyssey, pero la tapa definitivamente podría ser mejor si  redujera el sangrado de pantalla desigual y se solucionaran los biseles interiores sobresalientes. Esperamos que las revisiones futuras añadan aún más opciones de hardware como renovación de 120 Hz, tiempos de respuesta de 5 ms, G-Sync y Thunderbolt 3.

Si el tamaño pequeño es importante, entonces el Sabre 15 es uno de los mejores portáties gaming de bajo presupuesto disponibles con su respetable conjunto de características. Para ventiladores mas silenciosos y mejores altavoces, seguimos recomendando portátiles gaming de 15" y más gruesos como el GT62VR. 

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Gigabyte Sabre 15G - 07/24/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabado
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
58 / 81 → 72%
Peso
60 / 66 → 89%
Battería
77%
Pantalla
79%
Rendimiento de juegos
89%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
92%
Temperatura
92 / 95 → 96%
Ruido
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
30%
Cámara
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
72%
79%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Análisis breve del portátil Gigabyte Sabre 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050)
Allen Ngo, 2017-07-24 (Update: 2017-07-24)