Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Microsoft Surface Laptop (i5-7200U)

Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 06/21/2017

Todo pantalla y nada de sustancia. El nuevo Surface Laptop suena y parece más especial de lo que realmente es. Si bien su pantalla táctil 3:2 única es brillante, nítida, y colorida para los artistas gráficos, casi todo lo demás no logra impresionar.

Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 (Surface Laptop Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Adaptador gráfico
Intel HD Graphics 620, Núcleo: 300 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, LPDDR3, 21.20.16.4636
Memoría
4096 MB 
, 1866.7 MHz, Dual-Channel, 10-10-10-28, Soldered
pantalla
13.5 pulgadas 3:2, 2256 x 1504 pixels 201 PPI, Yes, ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, lustroso: si
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, 128 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm combo, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 14.5 x 308 x 223
Battería
45 Wh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.25 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 200 g
Precio
1000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

312 mm 232 mm 23 mm 1.7 kg308 mm 223 mm 14.5 mm 1.3 kg304 mm 212 mm 15 mm 1.4 kg304 mm 200 mm 15 mm 1.2 kg297.7 mm 224.6 mm 16.2 mm 1.5 kg292 mm 202 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: AC adapter (SurfaceConnect)
Right: AC adapter (SurfaceConnect)
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: USB 3.0, mDP, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: USB 3.0, mDP, 3.5 mm combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
588 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼98% +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼95%
392
cd/m²
396.6
cd/m²
372.5
cd/m²
387.8
cd/m²
384.2
cd/m²
376.9
cd/m²
368.2
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
370.9
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 396.6 cd/m² Médio: 378.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.18 cd/m²
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 384.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1067:1 (Negro: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
94.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, 13.5, 2256x1504
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 13.5, 3000x2000
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1824
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
APPA033, , 13.3, 2560x1600
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-10%
13%
-18%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.8 (25.6, 25.2)
61 (28, 33)
-20%
46 (17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
9%
47.2 (19.6, 27.6)
7%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
35%
Response Time Black / White *
37.2 (20, 17.2)
37 (21, 16)
1%
31.2 (6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
16%
53 (10, 43)
-42%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
11%
PWM Frequency
50 (50)
Screen
-8%
-32%
6%
-84%
Brightness middle
384.2
459
19%
413
7%
569
48%
351.2
-9%
Brightness
378
423
12%
396
5%
542
43%
325
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
87
-3%
90
0%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.37
-3%
0.36
-0%
0.56
-56%
0.195
46%
Contrast
1067
1241
16%
1147
7%
1016
-5%
1801
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
2.28
-27%
3.09
-72%
1.4
22%
7.4
-311%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.2
3.61
14%
2.9
31%
9.08
-116%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
2.48
-107%
3.92
-227%
1.8
-50%
6.71
-459%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
2.16 102%
2.74 80%
CCT
6708 97%
8602 76%
7333 89%
6877 95%
7222 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.7
62
-3%
61
-4%
78.4
23%
50.48
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94.2
96
2%
97
3%
99.3
5%
73.31
-22%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-9% / -8%
-10% / -24%
-6% / 2%
-31% / -66%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
37.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20 ms subida
↘ 17.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 94 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (25.2 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
50.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 25.6 ms subida
↘ 25.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (40.3 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9533 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points ∼74% +29%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼64% +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points ∼60% +4%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼59% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
126 Points ∼58% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
124 Points ∼57% -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼58%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼54% -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼40% -30%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼39% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
379 Points ∼9% +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼8% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points ∼8% +5%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼7% +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
324 Points ∼7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points ∼7% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points ∼7% -5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points ∼7% -9%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼6% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼5% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.85 Points ∼76% +54%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼67% +37%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼60% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
1.45 Points ∼59% +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
1.36 Points ∼56% +13%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼55% +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.2 Points ∼49%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼42% -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points ∼40% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
4.03 Points ∼15% +15%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼14% +9%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼14% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.5 Points ∼13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
3.45 Points ∼13% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
3.3 Points ∼12% -6%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼12% -7%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼11% -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points ∼8% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
6263 Points ∼58% +27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼52% +15%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points ∼46% +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
4913 Points ∼45%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
4846 Points ∼45% -1%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
4396 Points ∼41% -11%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼36% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3286 Points ∼30% -33%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
13170 Points ∼26% +36%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23% +20%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points ∼23% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
10525 Points ∼21% +8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
10003 Points ∼20% +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
9706 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼18% -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
6994 Points ∼14% -28%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
787.585 s * ∼9% -69%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
526 s * ∼6% -13%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.287 s * ∼6% -0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
465.277 s * ∼5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5% +2%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
898 Seconds * ∼4% -24%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
817.6 Seconds * ∼4% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
722.288 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
655.742 Seconds * ∼3% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
643 Seconds * ∼3% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3% +22%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5609
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9706
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4913
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
29.18 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.2 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
40.48 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
324 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
4106 Points ∼63%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3949 Points ∼61% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3853 Points ∼59% -6%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
4205 Points ∼44% +6%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4136 Points ∼43% +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3962 Points ∼42%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3280 Points ∼54% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3071 Points ∼50%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3040 Points ∼50% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3071 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3962 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4106 puntos
ayuda
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
328%
115%
528%
293%
Write 4k QD32
41.18
347.1
743%
153.6
273%
419
917%
218.3
430%
Read 4k QD32
77.75
326.9
320%
368.3
374%
657
745%
479.2
516%
Write 4k
40.45
108.6
168%
101.5
151%
23.5
-42%
116.9
189%
Read 4k
22.15
40.91
85%
28.51
29%
16.1
-27%
29.31
32%
Write 512
126.7
698.1
451%
154.2
22%
1481
1069%
439.9
247%
Read 512
278.5
687.4
147%
266.3
-4%
1183
325%
1036
272%
Write Seq
128.2
860.9
572%
154.2
20%
1336
942%
732.6
471%
Read Seq
425.6
1017
139%
666
56%
1662
291%
1233
190%
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Sequential Read: 425.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 128.2 MB/s
512K Read: 278.5 MB/s
512K Write: 126.7 MB/s
4K Read: 22.15 MB/s
4K Write: 40.45 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 77.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 41.18 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points ∼11% +114%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2517 (min: 2509, max: 2525) Points ∼11% +107%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1858 Points ∼8% +53%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼8% +51%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1650 Points ∼7% +36%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1486 Points ∼7% +22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1215 Points ∼5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1014 Points ∼4% -17%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
698 Points ∼3% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2761.5 (min: 2743, max: 2780) Points ∼5% +88%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points ∼5% +84%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
2206 Points ∼4% +50%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +45%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1587 Points ∼3% +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1467 Points ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1410 Points ∼3% -4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1186 Points ∼2% -19%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
744 Points ∼1% -49%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
1698 Points ∼4% +115%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points ∼4% +110%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1621 Points ∼4% +105%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% +74%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1055 Points ∼3% +34%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
825 Points ∼2% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
789 Points ∼2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
735 Points ∼2% -7%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points ∼7% +101%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
13153 Points ∼7% +101%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼6% +72%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
9056 Points ∼5% +38%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8861 Points ∼5% +36%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
7064 Points ∼4% +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6539 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6078 Points ∼3% -7%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
4983 Points ∼3% -24%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
51806 Points ∼7% +56%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
40939 Points ∼6% +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
33260 Points ∼5%
3DMark 11 Performance
1586 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
48984 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5454 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
743 puntos
ayuda
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.827.422.77fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 18.5fps

Ruido

Ocioso
28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB(A)
Carga
30.3 / 39.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Noise
-8%
-14%
-4%
2%
off / environment *
28.2
29.4
-4%
30.2
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
29.4
-4%
31.5
-12%
30.2
-7%
28.9
-2%
Idle Average *
28.2
29.4
-4%
31.5
-12%
30.2
-7%
28.9
-2%
Idle Maximum *
29
29.7
-2%
31.5
-9%
30.2
-4%
28.9
-0%
Load Average *
30.3
39
-29%
40.5
-34%
33
-9%
30.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
39.3
40.2
-2%
40.7
-4%
36.2
8%
33.5
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.5

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 33.8 °C36.4 °C30.2 °C 
 28.6 °C34 °C27.4 °C 
 25 °C25.6 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C
42.4 °C45.2 °C42.2 °C
38.4 °C41.4 °C38.4 °C
35.8 °C37 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 45.2 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
Conector de corriente  37.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+2.2 °C / 4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203941.6253536.83132.8354033.934.45033.334.16333.4338031.935.410031.238.812530.44516030.253.420028.355.125027.758.431527.759.840026.258.850025.464.663025.763.38002562.8100024.564.2125023.861.4160023.762.9200023.661.9250023.361.4315023.256.1400022.958.4500022.957.3630022.957.980002357.31000022.958.21250022.959.41600022.948.1SPL36.172.9N2.733.2median 23.8median 58.4Delta2.13.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop i5Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.5 / 6.8 Watt
Carga midlight 28.2 / 36 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
6600U, GeForce GTX 965M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-75%
-12%
-34%
14%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
4.15
-30%
4.4
-38%
2.1
34%
4.1
-28%
Idle Average *
6.5
8
-23%
9
-38%
7.6
-17%
4.2
35%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
11.9
-75%
10.7
-57%
8.2
-21%
5.1
25%
Load Average *
28.2
67
-138%
19.6
30%
56.4
-100%
22.1
22%
Load Maximum *
36
76
-111%
19.9
45%
59.8
-66%
29.4
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
22h 31min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 02min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 04min
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
6600U, GeForce GTX 965M, 78 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
Duración de Batería
-6%
-24%
-27%
12%
-15%
Reader / Idle
1351
1530
13%
899
-33%
1295
-4%
WiFi v1.3
602
576
-4%
427
-29%
566
-6%
677
12%
511
-15%
Load
124
90
-27%
111
-10%
66
-47%
157
27%

Pro

+ colores y escala de grises muy precisos antes de calibrar
+ brillante display; niveles de negro excelentes
+ construcción excelente; diseño rígido
+ cobertura sRGB casi completa
+ texctura Alcantara única
+ altavoces por encima de la media
+ soporta Windows Hello
+ reposamanos fresco
+ ventilador quedo
+ gran aguante de batería

Contra

- sin USB type-C, Thunderbolt 3, SIM, lector SD, bloqueo Kensington, ni lector de huellas
- la parte inferior de la base se calienta bastante bajo cargas fuertes
- el chasis reverbera notablemente durante la reproducción de audio
- débil rendimiento de la HD Graphics 620
- incapaz de mantener el CPU Turbo Boost máximo
- el usuario no puede hacerle mantenimiento
- no trae accesorios ni adaptadores
- ventilador de sistema ligeramente agudo
- incomprensible posición del botón de Encendido
- tiempos de respuesta de display lentos
- DDR3 RAM instead of DDR4
- Core i7 SKU is very pricey
- very slow SSD
Microsoft Surface Laptop Core i5
Microsoft Surface Laptop Core i5

Microsoft anuncia el Surface Laptop como "más que un portátil tradicional", pero nuestra experiencia ha sido la opuesta. Si características como USB Type-C, lector SD, y NVMe son importantes, los actuales Ultrabooks insignia de Lenovo, HP, y Dell tienen más de lo que el último Microsoft Surface puede ofrecer. La base Alcantara ciertamente es diferente y da otro punto único de venta, pero su inclusión parece superficial sin ventajas importantes para el usuario final.

El mayor motivo para comprar un Surface Laptop es su display de 13.5" ya que todo lo demás es bastante decepcionante. Si el panel 3:2 o la configuración con Iris Graphics no son movitos para comprarlo, el portátil resulta mucho menos atractivo comparado con la plétora de alternativas de 13 y 14" disponibles. El gran aguante de batería, bajo ruido de ventilador, y amplia cobertura de color del portátil Microsoft también se pueden encontrar en competidores como XPS 13 9360 QHDNotebook 9.

Cómo rendirá la versión con Core i7 bajo estrés será algo interesante de ver en un futuro análisis. Si nuestra configuración Core i5 apenas puede mantener la velocidad Turbo Boost en la horquilla 2.7 - 2.8 GHz, nos preguntamos cómo la configuración más exigente con Core i7 puede mantener su velocidad Turbo Boost máxima  de 4.0 GHz. También nos preocupa si la RAM DDR3 contendrá el potencial completo de la GPU Iris Plus Graphics 640 de modo parecido al que nuestra GPU HD Graphics 620 decepciona en nuestra configuración Core i5.

Microsoft dirige su portátil a estudiantes, por lo que nos gusta que la calidad del dispositivo no parece sufrir recortes. Dicho eso, su larga lista de características ausentes limita severamente la versatilidad del Surface Laptop y hace que nos cueste recomendarlo tanto a estudiantes como a usuarios en general.

Demasiado poco, demasiado tarde. El Surface Laptop es un portátil sin florituras construido sólidamente con un display hermoso. Por desgracia, no ofrece mucho más y ni se acerca a la versatilidad del Surface Pro 4 o de la mayoría de Ultrabooks actualmente en el mercado. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 - 06/18/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabado
79 /  98 → 81%
Teclado
79%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
32 / 80 → 40%
Peso
72 / 35-78 → 86%
Battería
93%
Pantalla
90%
Rendimiento de juegos
58 / 68 → 86%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
78 / 87 → 90%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruido
96%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Cámara
53 / 85 → 62%
Médio
74%
85%
Subnotebook - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Microsoft Surface Laptop (i5-7200U)
Allen Ngo, 2017-06-21 (Update: 2017-06-21)