Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)

Ligero y caro. El nuevo Notebook 9 lleva un display impresionantemente brillante que es igualmente frágil. El flexible chasis hunde una máquina por demás fiable y muy portable.
Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US (Notebook 9 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1004 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, DDR3, 375.63, Optimus
Memoría
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel (a bordo)
pantalla
15.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 147 PPI, ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 350nit (modo exterior: 500nit), lustroso: si
Placa base
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco duro
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 15.4 x 347.9 x 229.4
Battería
66 Wh Litio-Polimero, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 15 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, guía de inicio rápido, Samsung PC Cleaner, Recovery, Update, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.21 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 210 g
Precio
1500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

361.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2.1 kg355.6 mm 251 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg349 mm 241 mm 16 mm 1.8 kg347.9 mm 229.4 mm 15.4 mm 1.2 kg323 mm 223 mm 18.95 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
120.5 MB/s ∼100% +75%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
 
68.72 MB/s ∼57%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
 
64 MB/s ∼53% -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +192%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
 
86.9 MB/s ∼34% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
 
86.49 MB/s ∼34%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
208 MBit/s ∼31% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
465 MBit/s ∼88%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
142 MBit/s ∼27% -69%
508.3
cd/m²
545.1
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
524.7
cd/m²
565.6
cd/m²
498.9
cd/m²
520.8
cd/m²
550.5
cd/m²
501.3
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 565.6 cd/m² Médio: 524 cd/m² Minimum: 7.65 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 565.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Negro: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15.00, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.60, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple APPA030, IPS, 15.40, 2880x1800
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Response Times
-47%
18981%
117%
132%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
54 (33.2, 20)
-32%
46 (18, 28)
-13%
44 (20.4, 23.6)
-8%
41.6 (13.2, 28.4)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
32.4 (17.6, 14.8)
52.4 (33.2, 19.2)
-62%
56 (11, 45)
-73%
38.8 (6.4, 32.4)
-20%
15.2 (2, 13.2)
53%
PWM Frequency
208.3 (99)
119000 (80)
57029%
1000 (99)
380%
925.9 (90)
345%
Screen
-42%
-3%
-9%
-35%
Brightness middle
565.6
400
-29%
420
-26%
351.5
-38%
339
-40%
Brightness
524
392
-25%
401
-23%
336
-36%
314
-40%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
90
2%
83
-6%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.26
47%
0.3
39%
0.24
51%
0.36
27%
Contrast
1154
1538
33%
1400
21%
1465
27%
942
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
4.9
-145%
3.33
-67%
3.3
-65%
4.2
-110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5
11
-120%
5.11
-2%
7.3
-46%
7.8
-56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
7.2
-188%
2.73
-9%
1.9
24%
5.1
-104%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.11 104%
2.48 89%
2.09 105%
2.16 102%
CCT
6896 94%
6911 94%
6457 101%
6784 96%
6569 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.2
64.2
5%
78.09
28%
64.4
5%
59.4
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.5
98.9
1%
99.97
3%
88.2
-10%
91
-7%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-45% / -43%
9489% / 4378%
54% / 20%
49% / 4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
32.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 17.6 ms subida
↘ 14.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (24.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20.4 ms subida
↘ 20.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (38.7 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 208.3 Hz ≤ 99 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 208.3 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 208.3 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación).

Comparación: 51 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9725 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
154 Points ∼57% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼53% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼51%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼47% -7%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
127 Points ∼47% -9%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
123 Points ∼45% -12%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
112 Points ∼41% -19%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼32% -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
704 Points ∼16% +105%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
351 Points ∼8% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼8%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼7% -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points ∼7% -8%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
276 Points ∼6% -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼6% -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
223 Points ∼5% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼53% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼52%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼47% -10%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
1.43 Points ∼46% -13%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
1.27 Points ∼40% -23%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.16 Points ∼37% -29%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼33% -37%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.87 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼8%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼7% -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.56 Points ∼7% -7%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
3.07 Points ∼6% -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼6% -26%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
2.4 Points ∼5% -37%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
21079 Points ∼32% +81%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼18%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points ∼17% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
11109 Points ∼17% -5%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
9543 Points ∼15% -18%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
9158 Points ∼14% -22%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼13% -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
7448 Points ∼11% -36%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼50%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
5580 Points ∼50% -1%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points ∼45% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
4835 Points ∼43% -14%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
4779 Points ∼43% -15%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
4695 Points ∼42% -17%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
4230 Points ∼38% -25%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼35% -31%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -41%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
521.22 s * ∼6% -14%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.287 s * ∼6% -2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
241 s * ∼3% +47%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6681
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11676
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5630
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
49.95 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.83 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.64 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
65.32 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
343 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4928 Points ∼72%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4755 Points ∼70% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
4422 Points ∼65% -10%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
5114 Points ∼44% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4984 Points ∼43% +5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4769 Points ∼41%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4066 Points ∼66% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3852 Points ∼62%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
3588 Points ∼58% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3852 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4769 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4928 puntos
ayuda
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple SSD SM1024L
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
8%
-3%
-6%
5%
Write 4k QD32
419.3
398.1
-5%
562.1
34%
395.2
-6%
474.4
13%
Read 4k QD32
545.3
509.1
-7%
679.3
25%
527.2
-3%
558.9
2%
Write 4k
131.9
134.1
2%
10.9
-92%
139.4
6%
144.1
9%
Read 4k
58.35
45.14
-23%
9.786
-83%
40.72
-30%
58.42
0%
Write 512
764.7
1119
46%
1058
38%
713.9
-7%
903.4
18%
Read 512
651.2
977.4
50%
913.7
40%
834.2
28%
788.7
21%
Write Seq
1281
1106
-14%
1440
12%
981.5
-23%
1134
-11%
Read Seq
1447
1684
16%
1458
1%
1266
-13%
1210
-16%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1447 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1281 MB/s
512K Read: 651.2 MB/s
512K Write: 764.7 MB/s
4K Read: 58.35 MB/s
4K Write: 131.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 545.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 419.3 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
2784 Points ∼12% +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2609 Points ∼11% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points ∼11% +47%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U
2576 Points ∼11% +46%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1770 Points ∼7%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1466 Points ∼6% -17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1190 Points ∼5% -33%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
892 Points ∼4% -50%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
867 Points ∼4% -51%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
3220 Points ∼5% +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points ∼5% +21%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U
2645 Points ∼5% +19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2576 Points ∼4% +16%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2230 Points ∼4%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1856 Points ∼3% -17%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1309 Points ∼2% -41%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1146 Points ∼2% -49%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
1090 Points ∼2% -51%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2115 Points ∼4% +33%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U
2113 Points ∼4% +33%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
1903 Points ∼4% +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points ∼3% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1593 Points ∼3%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1213 Points ∼2% -24%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
783 Points ∼2% -51%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
672 Points ∼1% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
14594 Points ∼7% +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points ∼6% +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
11821 Points ∼6% +41%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U
11513 Points ∼6% +37%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
8385 Points ∼4%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
8107 Points ∼4% -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
6331 Points ∼3% -24%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
6189 Points ∼3% -26%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
98218 Points ∼13% +132%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
42314 Points ∼6%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
40461 Points ∼6% -4%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
34077 Points ∼5% -19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
33758 Points ∼5% -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
2372 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
49982 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6800 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1408 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
722 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
64.3 fps ∼100% +64%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
51 fps ∼79% +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
47.9 fps ∼74% +22%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
39.3 fps ∼61%
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
18 fps ∼28% -54%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
16 fps ∼25% -59%
bajo medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 89.8 48.7 39.3 13.5 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 31 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 95 64 24 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 37.4 20.5 10.9 fps
Overwatch (2016) 65.2 44.8 fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Tooltip
The Witcher 3 low

Ruido

Ocioso
28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A)
Carga
38.3 / 38.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise
-11%
-6%
-9%
-4%
off / environment *
28.3
28.4
-0%
29
-2%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
29
-2%
30.3
-7%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Average *
28.3
29
-2%
30.3
-7%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
32.2
-14%
30.3
-7%
36.3
-28%
31.1
-10%
Load Average *
38.3
47.1
-23%
35.1
8%
42.7
-11%
35.2
8%
Load Maximum *
38.3
47.1
-23%
46
-20%
42.7
-11%
41.3
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 40 °C40.4 °C37.8 °C 
 34.2 °C38.8 °C29.8 °C 
 31.6 °C30.4 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
37.2 °C42.4 °C39 °C
31.2 °C35.2 °C34.8 °C
29.6 °C32 °C32.4 °C
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
Conector de corriente  38 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203637.12535.338.93132.934.44033.731.85032.932.56332.632.38030.530.710028.230.312529.229.716027.72820025.931250264131525.647.540025.747.850024.347.563023.846.780022.954100022.856.8125022.556.2160022.453.220002253250021.953.6315021.750.6400021.853500021.745.3630021.655.3800021.858.21000021.8581250021.855.41600021.848.7SPL34.666.2N2.320.3median 22.5median 50.6Delta2.1635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.83 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5 / 11.6 / 12.2 Watt
Carga midlight 47.8 / 55.7 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.00
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, Apple SSD SM1024L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.40
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-91%
-12%
-18%
28%
Idle Minimum *
5
11.9
-138%
3
40%
8.14
-63%
4.6
8%
Idle Average *
11.6
17.1
-47%
9.9
15%
10.91
6%
7.6
34%
Idle Maximum *
12.2
17.3
-42%
12.5
-2%
12.26
-0%
7.7
37%
Load Average *
47.8
94.7
-98%
70.6
-48%
45.67
4%
35.1
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.9
104.8
-102%
Load Maximum *
55.7
122
-119%
90.8
-63%
74.94
-35%
36.2
35%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
27h 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 04min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 56min
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Apple MacBook 13"
T7200, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950,  Wh
Duración de Batería
-29%
-27%
-10%
-53%
-37%
Reader / Idle
1642
831
-49%
866
-47%
614
-63%
390
-76%
WiFi v1.3
604
434
-28%
619
2%
535
-11%
259
-57%
Load
116
103
-11%
52
-55%
148
28%
70
-40%
120
3%

Pro

+ mantenibilidad sencilla; SSD M.2 mejorable
+ display impresionantemente nítido y colorido
+ muy brillante; Modo Exterior
+ cobertura sRGB casi completa
+ muy ligero y portable
+ soporte Thunderbolt 3 completo
+ teclado cómodo
+ ventiladores quedos; sin pulso
+ gran aguante de batería
+ chasis de metal

Contra

- sin opciones de pantalla táctil, mate, o de mayor resolución
- tapa muy frágil; falta vidrio borde-a-borde
- GeForce 940MX con RAM DDR3 más lenta
- volumen máximo mejorable
- RAM no mejorable
- sin lector SD de tamaño completo
- sin opciones WWAN
- caro
Samsung Notebook 9 Always NP900X5N-X01US
Samsung Notebook 9 Always NP900X5N-X01US

El Notebook 9 NP900X5N sobresale en muchas categorías, pero falla en algunas áreas clave. Elogiamos al fabricante por poder ofrecer un display 1080p tan brillante en un sistema tan ligero y tener opciones de dGPU disponibles. Si brillo, portabilidad, longevidad, conectividad Thunderbolt, y gráficas GeForce son una prioridad, el Notebook 9 resulta una recomendación sencilla especialmente si los usuarios consideran frívolas las opciones de pantalla táctil o las alternativas de 14" les son demasiado pequeñas para su productividad.

El Samsung dista de la perfección, y  la rigidez del chasis es meramente mediocre con algunas elecciones de configuración de display. Por encantador que pueda ser el display de bisel estrecho, es mucho más flexible que los de los competidores. Es raro que el panel lustroso sea obligatorio y no lleve protección Gorilla Glass u opciones de pantalla táctil que típicamente lo acompañan. La presencia de PWM en casi todos los niveles de brillo es otro factor que algunos usuarios pueden querer tener en cuenta antes de comprarlo.

Además, nos decepciona ver que sólo trae la versión DDR3 de la GeForce 940MX en vez de la superior GDDR5, especialmente dado que esta GPU está envejeciendo a pasos agigantados. Nvidia pronto lanzará la GeForce MX150 para portátiles delgados-y-ligeros que en esencia dejarán obsoleta a la serie 940MX.

Por último, el sistema es bastante caro con $1400 para nuestra configuración particular. Los pros siguen superando a los contras, mientras que los dueños puedan evitar los golpes y arañazos a la frágil tapa.

El nuevo Notebook 9 es único debido a su pantalla de 15.0" que ocupa el hueco entre los portátiles de 14" y  15.6". Es sorprendentemente portable y cómodo de usar especialmente para viajeros constantes, pero al chasis le habría venido bien algo más de refuerzo.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US - 06/15/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabado
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
87%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
53 / 81 → 66%
Peso
73 / 20-67 → 100%
Battería
93%
Pantalla
88%
Rendimiento de juegos
64 / 85 → 75%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
92%
Ruido
95 / 95 → 100%
Audio
50%
Cámara
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
76%
86%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)
Allen Ngo, 2017-06-15 (Update: 2017-06-15)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief