Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del smartphone LG K4 (2017)

Inge Schwabe (traducido por Francisco García), 08/06/2017

Bueno para principiantes. Este teléfono es realmente un primer smartphone ideal: si no estás acostumbrado a los smartphones, no tendrás dificultades para navegar a través de las pantallas de inicio, cambiar entre dos tarjetas SIM o tomar notas en el smartphone. El resto de personas quizás no queden satisfechos con el nivel de hardware del LG K4.

LG K4 2017 (K Serie)
Procesador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 1.1 GHz @ 1.1 GHz
Adaptador gráfico
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Memoría
1024 MB 
, LPDDR2/LPDDR3, 533MHz
pantalla
5 pulgadas 16:9, 854x480 pixels 196 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, TFT LCD, lustroso: si
Disco duro
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 3.61 GB disponibles, 3 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm jack de audio , Card Reader: microSD, hasta 32 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleración, sensor de proximidad, Wi-Fi Direct, PC Sync (LG Bridge)
Equipamento de red
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; UMTS: 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, HSDPA 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s; LTE: frecuencias 1/3/7/8/20 (CAT4), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8 x 144 x 72
Battería
9.6 Wh, 2500 mAh Litio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix autofoco, flash LED, HDR, comando por voz
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix foco fijo, función de autodisparo
Características adicionales
Altavoces: altavoz mono, Teclado: virtual, adaptador de corriente, cable USB, guía de inicio rápido, información de garantía, LG KnockCode, Easy Home, Capture+, Polaris Office, 24 Meses Garantía, valor de SAR: 0.556 W/Kg FM radio, fanless
Peso
136 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 50 g
Precio
120 Euros

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
79.9 MBit/s ∼100% +46%
LG K4 2017
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.9 MBit/s ∼69%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s ∼65% -5%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
33.5 MBit/s ∼42% -39%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼100% +61%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼67% +7%
LG K4 2017
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.9 MBit/s ∼62%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 MBit/s ∼61% -1%
overview
junction
crossing the canal

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
379
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 385 cd/m² Médio: 371.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5.32 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 385 cd/m²
Contraste: 1100:1 (Negro: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.08
LG K4 2017
854x480, 5
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo K6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-37%
-25%
-17%
24%
10%
9%
Brightness
372
443
19%
487
31%
479
29%
534
44%
461
24%
376
1%
Brightness Distribution
92
90
-2%
92
0%
95
3%
96
4%
88
-4%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.84
-140%
0.9
-157%
0.55
-57%
0.33
6%
0.38
-9%
0.32
9%
Contrast
1100
554
-50%
546
-50%
889
-19%
1630
48%
1237
12%
1172
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
7.8
-26%
6.6
-6%
8.3
-34%
5.7
8%
5.2
16%
6
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
8.4
-20%
4.9
30%
8.7
-24%
4.7
33%
5.6
20%
4.5
36%
Gamma
2.08 115%
2.07 116%
2.12 113%
2.08 115%
2.51 96%
2.24 107%
2.26 106%
CCT
8257 79%
8438 77%
7090 92%
9034 72%
7264 89%
7924 82%
6975 93%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 58 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 5559 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
15.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13.2 ms subida
↘ 12.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 8 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (26.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22.8 ms subida
↘ 23.2 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 70 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
19230 Points ∼8%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points ∼10% +24%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points ∼15% +76%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% +48%
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14% +69%
Lenovo K6
43673 Points ∼19% +127%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼10% +23%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
2152 Points ∼32%
Sony Xperia E5
2785 Points ∼41% +29%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
3741 Points ∼45%
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points ∼39% -13%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points ∼41% -9%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -31%
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼46% +2%
Lenovo K6
3387 Points ∼41% -9%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼35% -22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
9 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% 0%
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼41% +7000%
Lenovo K6
10 Points ∼1% +11%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼1% +11%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
144 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points ∼3% +97%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points ∼3% +97%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% +44%
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3% +94%
Lenovo K6
732 Points ∼9% +408%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼3% +60%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
257 Points ∼6%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points ∼8% +46%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points ∼13% +122%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% +93%
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼12% +115%
Lenovo K6
530 Points ∼12% +106%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼7% +17%
System (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
586 Points ∼9%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points ∼17% +87%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points ∼17% +87%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% +76%
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼17% +86%
Lenovo K6
1282 Points ∼19% +119%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼11% +27%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
119 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points ∼5% +54%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼5% +71%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% +50%
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15% +376%
Lenovo K6
263 Points ∼7% +121%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼4% +25%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
944 Points ∼6%
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼9% +62%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
390 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼11% +43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼28%
Lenovo K6
1047 Points ∼35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points ∼2%
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2%
Lenovo K6
240 Points ∼4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points ∼3%
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3%
Lenovo K6
290 Points ∼7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
293 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points ∼27% +182%
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼27% +179%
Lenovo K6
1002 Points ∼33% +242%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
0 Points ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points ∼2%
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2%
Lenovo K6
491 Points ∼6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
0 Points ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼4%
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4%
Lenovo K6
554 Points ∼11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
4143 Points ∼6%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points ∼14% +127%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% +90%
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼14% +126%
Lenovo K6
9034 Points ∼13% +118%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼10% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
2359 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points ∼1% +82%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% +40%
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1% +96%
Lenovo K6
9691 Points ∼2% +311%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
2609 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points ∼2% +87%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% +45%
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3% +99%
Lenovo K6
9537 Points ∼5% +266%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2% +63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
3.4 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps ∼1% +147%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps ∼1% +147%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% +76%
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1% +147%
Lenovo K6
16 fps ∼1% +371%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0% +41%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
10 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% +10%
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Lenovo K6
15 fps ∼3% +50%
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps ∼2% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
1 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps ∼1% +180%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% +110%
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1% +200%
Lenovo K6
7.1 fps ∼1% +610%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0% +70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
LG K4 2017
5.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps ∼2% +13%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps ∼2% +13%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% -13%
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼2% +11%
Lenovo K6
7 fps ∼2% +30%
HTC Desire 530
4 fps ∼1% -26%

Leyenda

 
LG K4 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo K6
21.436 Points ∼100% +114%
Huawei Y5 II
18.47 Points ∼86% +85%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
18.304 Points ∼85% +83%
Sony Xperia E5
17.885 Points ∼83% +79%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼67% +44%
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points ∼56% +21%
LG K4 2017
10 Points ∼47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo K6
3438 Points ∼100% +128%
Sony Xperia E5
2910 Points ∼85% +93%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2805 Points ∼82% +86%
Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points ∼79% +80%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼73% +66%
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points ∼52% +19%
LG K4 2017
1506 Points ∼44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K4 2017
19723.2 ms * ∼100%
HTC Desire 530
17470.6 ms * ∼89% +11%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼71% +29%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
13234 ms * ∼67% +33%
Sony Xperia E5
13232.4 ms * ∼67% +33%
Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * ∼63% +37%
Lenovo K6
10849.6 ms * ∼55% +45%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

LG K4 2017Huawei Y5 IIHuawei Y6 II CompactGigaset GS160Sony Xperia E5Lenovo K6HTC Desire 530
AndroBench 3-5
-60%
-60%
-58%
-6%
9%
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
44.41
18.03
-59%
17.12
-61%
19.19
-57%
45.56
3%
50.4
13%
18.22
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.28
29.47
-61%
31.57
-58%
30.71
-59%
65.03
-14%
78.2
4%
35.56
-53%
Carga Máx.
 42.1 °C32.5 °C33.2 °C 
 42.1 °C35.8 °C35.6 °C 
 38.4 °C39.3 °C34.7 °C 
Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
33 °C32.6 °C43.5 °C
32.4 °C32.7 °C41.7 °C
32.9 °C33.6 °C37.3 °C
Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C
Conector de corriente  32.3 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6302525.427.23125.3264032.927.15033.629.46331.635.38028.430.91002729.712520.827.21602224.820021.329.625020.838.231521.242.740019.450.650019.558.963017.764.180017.970.3100017.876.8125017.375.8160017.474.7200016.772.1250017.271.7315018.271.3400017.973.8500017.674.1630017.777.9800017.881.41000017.973.51250018.166.11600018.261.2SPL3086.5N1.366.4median 17.9LG K4 2017median 70.3Delta1.314.132.433.931.330.231.731.82632.939.440.236.235.328.629.825.428.321.33223.327.822.530.422.437.221.342.318.446.217.555.417.557.317.262.416.867.517.368.317.467.416.676.617.375.617.675.217.679.517.779.817.477.417.772.917.967.918.158.118.140.429.8871.359.8median 17.7Huawei Y5 IImedian 62.41.617.232.436.931.33431.733.82632.839.434.736.231.228.627.925.424.421.324.823.325.922.530.522.437.121.340.218.444.817.551.917.555.617.261.116.867.517.368.817.46516.673.617.375.517.676.117.679.217.779.517.475.717.77117.967.318.161.518.142.929.886.41.356.8median 17.7Huawei Y6 II Compactmedian 61.51.616.631.641.425.435.525.332.132.934.733.629.831.630.628.4312724.520.8272225.921.330.520.839.321.249.119.454.719.558.917.762.117.96917.873.217.374.317.471.916.770.317.266.418.263.817.963.717.660.617.761.917.867.617.968.118.156.818.249.53080.71.345median 17.9Gigaset GS160median 61.91.311.631.635.725.433.325.332.132.926.433.626.231.633.328.430.52734.320.832.62231.521.336.620.841.721.244.619.449.719.554.817.761.417.966.117.865.917.366.917.463.616.758.617.263.318.265.917.969.117.669.217.764.717.858.517.952.918.140.218.229.53076.51.337.3median 17.9Sony Xperia E5median 58.51.312.828.227.428.225.627.925.624.125.224.125.728.725.724.726.424.723.622.923.624.623.624.625.224.325.234.325.134.340.319.740.347.818.647.850.519.750.55219.95249.918.949.949.818.949.854.819.854.863.220.863.271.317.271.372.617.172.674.414.474.473.413.973.471.913.271.970.212.970.267.51367.568.412.868.473.812.773.875.712.775.772.512.872.569.112.869.159.913.159.983.62883.653.6153.6median 67.5Lenovo K6median 17.1median 67.511.33.811.342.539.632.442.541.235.531.341.236.834.831.736.846.9272646.947.927.339.447.934.526.536.234.52924.528.62927.928.625.427.925.222.721.325.225.321.323.325.326.422.822.526.426.819.922.426.8342021.33444.121.518.444.158.632.817.558.668.241.817.568.274.850.617.274.875.151.316.875.173.149.317.373.173.248.417.473.27448.716.67477.651.417.377.676.550.917.676.577.551.417.677.578.55317.778.575.449.717.475.477.252.417.777.268.54317.968.564.538.718.164.554.929.818.154.987.46229.887.46814.51.368median 68.5HTC Desire 530median 43median 17.7median 68.516.411.91.616.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG K4 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y5 II audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.37 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Gigaset GS160 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo K6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HTC Desire 530 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.14 / 1.25 Watt
Carga midlight 2.26 / 2.36 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG K4 2017
2500 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Power Consumption
-40%
-43%
-55%
-90%
-55%
-132%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.54
16%
0.57
11%
0.56
12%
1.03
-61%
0.65
-2%
1.58
-147%
Idle Average *
1.14
1.58
-39%
1.53
-34%
1.7
-49%
2.06
-81%
1.65
-45%
2.59
-127%
Idle Maximum *
1.25
1.7
-36%
1.6
-28%
1.75
-40%
2.12
-70%
1.67
-34%
2.66
-113%
Load Average *
2.26
2.98
-32%
2.82
-25%
4.17
-85%
5.01
-122%
3.58
-58%
5.22
-131%
Load Maximum *
2.36
4.98
-111%
5.69
-141%
5.07
-115%
5.04
-114%
5.58
-136%
5.67
-140%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
10h 06min
LG K4 2017
2500 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Duración de Batería
-17%
3%
1%
-30%
18%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1102
1175
1326
1626
1117
WiFi v1.3
606
503
-17%
623
3%
615
1%
422
-30%
715
18%
425
-30%
Load
253
222
244
350
250
H.264
682
702
633
457

Pro

+ buen tamaño
+ Doble SIM
+ MicroSD (ranura separada)
+ Batería intercambiable
+ Buen tiempo de autonomía de la batería
+ Display decente
+ Buen receptor GPS
+ Varias opciones de pantalla de inicio

Contra

- Rendimiento débil
- Baja resolución de pantalla
- Poco almacenamiento interno
- Sin soporte USB OTG
- Sin sensor de huellas dactilares
En análisis: LG K4 Dual 2017. Unidad de de pruebas cortesía de LG.
En análisis: LG K4 Dual 2017. Unidad de de pruebas cortesía de LG.

En comparación con su predecesor, el LG K4 ha florecido: Tiene un aspecto moderno y un mejor display LCD que el modelo pasado, aunque su baja resolución todavía no está a la altura. Su débil desempeño - tanto en las pruebas como en la práctica, que se hace evidente a través de su lenta respuesta a las órdenes, implica que no recomendaríamos el LG K4 a usuarios avanzados. Si estás buscando un teléfono simple, fácil de usar, vale la pena tener en cuenta el LG K4. Las opciones para la pantalla de inicio y especialmente el cambio sencillo entre las dos tarjetas SIM (de ser necesario) son una ventaja, pero no hay que olvidar la poca capacidad de almacenamiento interno. Nadie debería tener que confiar en una tarjeta de memoria externa.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

LG K4 2017 - 07/31/2017 v6
Inge Schwabe

Acabado
82%
Teclado
74 / 75 → 98%
Ratón
89%
Conectividad
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
94%
Battería
93%
Pantalla
82%
Rendimiento de juegos
4 / 63 → 6%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
20 / 70 → 29%
Temperatura
88%
Ruido
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Cámara
67%
Médio
68%
80%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del smartphone LG K4 (2017)
Inge Schwabe, 2017-08- 6 (Update: 2017-08- 6)