Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Sager NP5852 (Clevo N850HL, i7-7700HQ, MX150)

Allen Ngo (traducido por Francisco García), 09/22/2017

GeForce MX150 gaming. El rendimiento-por-vatio del MX150 es un salto generacional respecto a la 940MX, pero su elevado precio inicial en este momento da un mal rendimiento-por-dólar. Comprobamos el portátil gaming básico Sager NP5852 para ver cómo queda frente a las anteriores generaciones de ofertas Maxwell.

Sager NP5852 (NP Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030) - 2048 MB, Núcleo: 1468 MHz, Memoría: 6008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.05, Optimus
Memoría
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, PC4-19200, monocanal, 17-17-17-39
pantalla
15.6 pulgadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixels 141 PPI, ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B, 250 GB 
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: SD
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24.9 x 378 x 267
Battería
62 Wh, 5300 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 2 W estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, FlexiKey, 12 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.5 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 567 g
Precio
950 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 2, USB 3.0, SD reader
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 2, USB 3.0, SD reader
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
162.5 MB/s ∼100% +122%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
78.76 MB/s ∼48% +8%
Sager NP5852
73.19 MB/s ∼45%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
23.59 MB/s ∼15% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
256.7 MB/s ∼100% +198%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
86.53 MB/s ∼34% 0%
Sager NP5852
86.27 MB/s ∼34%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
20.96 MB/s ∼8% -76%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +289%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
240 MBit/s ∼36% +41%
Sager NP5852
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
170 MBit/s ∼26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +92%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
319 MBit/s ∼54% +3%
Sager NP5852
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
310 MBit/s ∼52%
292.8
cd/m²
274.1
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
301.9
cd/m²
303.9
cd/m²
281.3
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
291.9
cd/m²
266.4
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 303.9 cd/m² Médio: 286.2 cd/m² Minimum: 26.95 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 303.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 691:1 (Negro: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | - Ø
56.5% sRGB (Argyll) 36.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.24
Sager NP5852
ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
0%
1%
-16%
-8%
-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29.6 (14.8, 14.8)
32 (16.4, 15.6)
-8%
38.8 (20.4, 18.4)
-31%
41 (18, 23)
-39%
38 (20, 18)
-28%
38 (20, 18)
-28%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (18, 10)
25.6 (15.6, 10)
9%
27.2 (14.8, 12.4)
3%
26 (15, 11)
7%
28 (17, 11)
-0%
29 (17, 12)
-4%
PWM Frequency
20000 (99)
20000 (99)
0%
25910 (20)
30%
21000 (90)
5%
21000 (90)
5%
Screen
4%
36%
28%
33%
36%
Brightness
286
241
-16%
313
9%
236
-17%
276
-3%
283
-1%
Brightness Distribution
88
84
-5%
83
-6%
80
-9%
82
-7%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.44
0.3
32%
0.27
39%
0.17
61%
0.295
33%
0.27
39%
Contrast
691
828
20%
1241
80%
1382
100%
963
39%
1022
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.3
7.5
-3%
4.7
36%
4.69
36%
4.07
44%
3.92
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
6.5
2%
5.8
12%
3.34
49%
3.13
53%
2.6
61%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.19 110%
2.06 117%
2.63 91%
2.41 100%
2.53 95%
CCT
7652 85%
7852 83%
6518 100%
6801 96%
7082 92%
6561 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.4
37
2%
58.7
61%
36
-1%
56
54%
54.5
50%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56.5
57.9
2%
90.1
59%
57
1%
86
52%
83.7
48%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
2% / 3%
19% / 27%
6% / 19%
13% / 22%
14% / 24%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 18 ms subida
↘ 10 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (26.7 ms).
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
29.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14.8 ms subida
↘ 14.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 13 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (42.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 20000 Hz99 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 57 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 6668 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
163 Points ∼84% +1%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼83%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼78% -6%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼74% -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼72% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
129 Points ∼66% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼64% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
782 Points ∼36% +6%
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
763 Points ∼36% +4%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼34% 0%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼34%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
721 Points ∼34% -2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼24% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼23% -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.83 Points ∼83% +3%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.78 Points ∼81%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼78% -3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼70% -13%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.54 Points ∼70% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.49 Points ∼67% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼66% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.43 Points ∼35% +4%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼34% 0%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼34%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼31% -9%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
6.89 Points ∼29% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.56 Points ∼23% -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼22% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5993 Points ∼68%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5877 Points ∼66% -2%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5516 Points ∼62% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5006 Points ∼56% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼56% -17%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4720 Points ∼53% -21%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22143 Points ∼45%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21824 Points ∼44% -1%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
20801 Points ∼42% -6%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
19720 Points ∼40% -11%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17197 Points ∼35% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -35%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
351.3 s * ∼4% -57%
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
330.9 s * ∼4% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -44%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
225.617 s * ∼3% -1%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
224.18 s * ∼3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
205.34 s * ∼2% +8%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
593.228 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
591.2 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Sager NP5852
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
570.281 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -0%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
561.342 Seconds * ∼2% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
Intel Core i7-7820HK
523 Seconds * ∼2% +8%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
9227
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22143
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5993
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
65.23 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.78 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
96.46 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
735 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5765 Points ∼88% +15%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
5063 Points ∼78% +1%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
5011 Points ∼77%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
4590 Points ∼70% -8%
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4205 Points ∼65% -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
7882 Points ∼85% +66%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
4741 Points ∼51%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
4443 Points ∼48% -6%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4274 Points ∼46% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5460 Points ∼91% +46%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
3742 Points ∼63%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
3650 Points ∼61% -2%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3431 Points ∼57% -8%
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3372 Points ∼56% -10%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
6318 Points ∼67% +82%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4432 Points ∼47% +28%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
3476 Points ∼37%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
2298 Points ∼24% -34%
Productivity
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
7316 Points ∼77% +10%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
6749 Points ∼71% +2%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
6623 Points ∼70%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
5506 Points ∼58% -17%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
8283 Points ∼88% +15%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
7542 Points ∼80% +5%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
7204 Points ∼76%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
6239 Points ∼66% -13%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5206 Points ∼79% +32%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4364 Points ∼66% +11%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
3939 Points ∼60%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
3075 Points ∼47% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3742 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4741 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5011 puntos
ayuda
Sager NP5852
Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327
Liteonit CV3-8D512
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
AS SSD
-14%
215%
-60%
11%
-34%
Copy Game MB/s
263.64
323.54
23%
889.32
237%
214.61
-19%
410.43
56%
168.23
-36%
Copy Program MB/s
191.1
195.3
2%
336.44
76%
71.09
-63%
266.91
40%
123.39
-35%
Copy ISO MB/s
337.49
446.8
32%
1677.53
397%
296.68
-12%
491.45
46%
266.93
-21%
Score Total
1027
752
-27%
3731
263%
1043
2%
982
-4%
977
-5%
Score Write
335
234
-30%
1158
246%
405
21%
400
19%
316
-6%
Score Read
453
337
-26%
1727
281%
414
-9%
379
-16%
442
-2%
Access Time Write *
0.054
0.073
-35%
0.028
48%
0.42
-678%
0.067
-24%
0.224
-315%
Access Time Read *
0.092
0.141
-53%
0.031
66%
0.191
-108%
0.068
26%
0.084
9%
4K-64 Write
231.42
132.19
-43%
870.35
276%
309.5
34%
293.52
27%
233.59
1%
4K-64 Read
372.93
257.03
-31%
1430.2
284%
328.38
-12%
301.64
-19%
364.52
-2%
4K Write
57.51
53.75
-7%
133.23
132%
52.52
-9%
58.04
1%
63.46
10%
4K Read
30.12
28.3
-6%
53.95
79%
38.73
29%
27.05
-10%
27.19
-10%
Seq Write
457.12
479.79
5%
1540
237%
424.99
-7%
488.74
7%
190.78
-58%
Seq Read
497.64
515.92
4%
2429
388%
471.66
-5%
501.43
1%
502.41
1%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 559.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 521.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 322 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 309.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 505.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 465.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 32.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 66.33 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6166 Points ∼15% +66%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
5701 Points ∼14% +54%
Gigabyte P55K v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
5323 Points ∼13% +44%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ
3898 Points ∼10% +5%
Sager NP5852
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7700HQ
3704 Points ∼9%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4
3585 Points ∼9% -3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
3576 Points ∼9% -3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% -4%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3233 Points ∼8% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2132 Points ∼5% -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484) Points ∼4% -58%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel HD Graphics 630, 7700HQ
1211 Points ∼3% -67%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
39507 Points ∼24% +79%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
34892 Points ∼21% +58%
Gigabyte P55K v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
33304 Points ∼20% +51%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ
28094 Points ∼17% +27%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼14% +1%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4
22171 Points ∼14% 0%
Sager NP5852
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7700HQ
22116 Points ∼14%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
21794 Points ∼13% -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
19333 Points ∼12% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
13775 Points ∼8% -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969) Points ∼7% -48%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel HD Graphics 630, 7700HQ
10163 Points ∼6% -54%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
8447 Points ∼53% +91%
Gigabyte P55K v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
6712 Points ∼42% +52%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6707 Points ∼42% +52%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ
5021 Points ∼31% +14%
Sager NP5852
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7700HQ
4421 Points ∼28%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4
4378 Points ∼27% -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
4156 Points ∼26% -6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼26% -7%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3765 Points ∼24% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2877 Points ∼18% -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057) Points ∼14% -50%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel HD Graphics 630, 7700HQ
1867 Points ∼12% -58%
1280x720 Performance GPU
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
8597 Points ∼17% +84%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7731 Points ∼15% +66%
Gigabyte P55K v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7128 Points ∼14% +53%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ
4858 Points ∼10% +4%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4
4751 Points ∼9% +2%
Sager NP5852
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7700HQ
4662 Points ∼9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
4575 Points ∼9% -2%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4416 Points ∼9% -5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2535 Points ∼5% -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355) Points ∼5% -49%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel HD Graphics 630, 7700HQ
1783 Points ∼3% -62%
3DMark 11 Performance
4906 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
72119 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15501 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3353 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1709 puntos
ayuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
61 fps ∼100% +75%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
49.9 fps ∼82% +43%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4, Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
37.2 (min: 20.2) fps ∼61% +7%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
34.9 fps ∼57%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
30.2 fps ∼50% -13%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
24 (min: 5.7) fps ∼39% -31%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
13.5 fps ∼22% -61%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U, Apple SSD AP0256
13.3 (min: 8) fps ∼22% -62%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
34.2 fps ∼100% +78%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
25.6 fps ∼75% +33%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4, Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
19.3 (min: 17) fps ∼56% +1%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
19.2 fps ∼56%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
17.2 fps ∼50% -10%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
15.3 (min: 14) fps ∼45% -20%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
59 fps ∼100% +72%
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
34.4 fps ∼58%
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop), E5-2680 v4, Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
33.8 (min: 28) fps ∼57% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U, Apple SSD AP0256
21.4 (min: 17) fps ∼36% -38%
bajo medio alto ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 95.25121.2fps
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 66fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 202.9113.895.434.9fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 97.484.649.825.6fps
Thief (2014) 79.251.944.123.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 694223.512.6fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 5749228fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 45.82519.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 78.444.624.519.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 35.120.717.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 16854.434.4fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 31.221.914fps
Prey (2017) 50.64034fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 52.93923.7fps
F1 2017 (2017) 83413220fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344Tooltip
The Witcher 3 medium

Ruido

Ocioso
28.7 / 28.7 / 29.3 dB(A)
Carga
41.6 / 53.7 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Sager NP5852
GeForce MX150, 7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Noise
-11%
3%
0%
4%
4%
off / environment *
28.3
28.2
-0%
29.4
-4%
30.1
-6%
30
-6%
30.3
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28.7
33
-15%
29.4
-2%
30.1
-5%
30
-5%
30.3
-6%
Idle Average *
28.7
33.3
-16%
29.9
-4%
30.2
-5%
30
-5%
30.3
-6%
Idle Maximum *
29.3
34.7
-18%
29.9
-2%
30.5
-4%
30
-2%
30.3
-3%
Load Average *
41.6
44.5
-7%
38.3
8%
41.1
1%
37.3
10%
35.4
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.8
49.2
-24%
39.8
-0%
40.4
-2%
Load Maximum *
53.7
52.8
2%
39.6
26%
41.2
23%
38
29%
37.2
31%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 46.8 °C28.8 °C32 °C 
 33.6 °C39 °C33.4 °C 
 28.8 °C32.2 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
28.8 °C31 °C40.2 °C
40.8 °C30.4 °C33.6 °C
25.6 °C35 °C28.6 °C
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
Conector de corriente  50.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.437.32538.834.63134.8344035.533.9503534.96333.631.78032.931.410030.430.81253030.116029.33020028.72825027.330.131526.840.740026.648.450026.246.563025.449.180025.353.4100024.557.9125024.364.1160024.267.3200024.362.32500245831502453.8400023.848.8500023.857.5630023.958.2800023.9571000025.7471250024.248.11600024.449.7SPL36.772.1N2.824.8median 24.5Sager NP5852median 49.1Delta1.88.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sager NP5852 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (18% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (19.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.52 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 9.2 / 11.2 / 11.3 Watt
Carga midlight 71.3 / 80.1 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sager NP5852
7700HQ, GeForce MX150, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
7200U, GeForce MX150, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus N552VX-FY103T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000
7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Power Consumption
-16%
35%
29%
-5%
-24%
25%
Idle Minimum *
9.2
8
13%
2.9
68%
3.9
58%
7
24%
8.3
10%
3.8
59%
Idle Average *
11.2
10.9
3%
5.9
47%
7.9
29%
10.9
3%
14.8
-32%
6.5
42%
Idle Maximum *
11.3
11
3%
6.4
43%
11.3
-0%
12.9
-14%
16.8
-49%
7.2
36%
Load Average *
71.3
76.7
-8%
54
24%
47
34%
72
-1%
71
-0%
62.5
12%
Load Maximum *
80.1
106.4
-33%
66
18%
62
23%
109
-36%
119.2
-49%
99.6
-24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.8
94.9
-73%
51
7%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
8h 18min
Navegando con WLAN v1.3
5h 51min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 01min
Sager NP5852
7700HQ, GeForce MX150, 62 Wh
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 73 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
7200U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh
Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 55 Wh
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh
Duración de Batería
-21%
41%
72%
44%
-22%
Reader / Idle
498
493
-1%
1061
113%
1253
152%
429
-14%
WiFi v1.3
351
261
-26%
535
52%
517
47%
506
44%
268
-24%
Load
121
77
-36%
70
-42%
142
17%
87
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra
68

Pro

+ temperaturas relativamente frescas durante el juego
+ teclas firmes y trackpad cómodo
+ máquina gaming básica capaz
+ mantenibilidad relativamente sencilla
+ ventiladores quedos con cargas bajas
+ chasis de diseño ingenioso

Contra

- grande y pesado visto el rendimiento gaming básico
- Turbo Boost fluctúa bajo cargas CPU extremas
- ventiladores pulsantes bajo cargas CPU extremas
- atrae las huellas y la grasa
- falta de opciones de display
- rigidez de tapa mejorable
- teclas de ratón esponjosas
- poco espectro de color
- aguante mediocre de batería
- sin Thunderbolt 3
Sager NP5852. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Sager Notebook Computers
Sager NP5852. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Sager Notebook Computers

Respecto al rendimiento, el potencial gaming de la MX150 es impresionante visto que consume un 40% menos energía que el Sabre 15 (GTX 1050) jugando, siendo un 40 - 45% más lento. Tanto las temperaturas como el ruido de ventilador son bastante menores, lo que ofrece una experiencia gaming respetable entre tarea y tarea de clase. Es realmente sorprendente ver un rendimiento a la par con portátiles GTX 860MGTX 950M por parte de una GPU Pascal básica.

Nuestras quejas principales con el NP5852 no son tanto con su rendimiento sino con su precio y su chasis. Primero, el precio inicial de $800 se acerca bastante al del Sabre 15, Samsung Odyssey, o Pavilion 15 Power con gráfica  GTX 1050 más veloz. Los compradores potenciales sóno tendrán que invertir unos $100 - $200 más para obtener un enorme aumento en potencia GPU si los juegos son una prioridad. En segundo lugar, el chasis es más bien grande para la GPU básica MX150. Las mencionadas alternativas no son mucho más grandes o gruesas que nuestro Sager y por ello un chasis más pequeño estilo Ultrabook habría sido más adecuado para la MX150. Emparejar la MX150 con un Intel clase U definitivamente resultará en un rendimiento gaming ligeramente inferior como han mostrado nuestras comparaciones frente al Aspire 5 A515, pero el extremo ahorro en peso y portabilidad seguramente superará las desventajas para la mayoría de jugones.

El Sager NP5852 es una máquina gaming casual de vuelta a clase genial. Espera, empero, un par de mesxes y el mercado de portátiles estará saturado con diseños más delgados y ligeros con la misma GPU MX150. El NP5852 sólo es recomendable si los precios caen por debajo de la actual cosecha de portátiles GTX 1050 asequibles.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Sager NP5852 - 09/21/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabado
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
81%
Conectividad
58 / 81 → 72%
Peso
60 / 66 → 89%
Battería
87%
Pantalla
79%
Rendimiento de juegos
79%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
92%
Temperatura
90 / 95 → 94%
Ruido
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
30%
Cámara
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
73%
78%
Gaming - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Sager NP5852 (Clevo N850HL, i7-7700HQ, MX150)
Allen Ngo, 2017-09-22 (Update: 2017-09-22)