Notebookcheck

Breve análisis del Smartphone Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traducido por Francisco García), 12/04/2017

Ambicioso.Con la cuarta generación de la serie ZenFone, Asus lanza un reto a un nicho de mercado de fiera competencia al ofrecer no sólo un precio competitivo, sino equipar a su nueva oferta con una potente cámara. Además, ZenUI ha dado un gran salto adelante, haciendo que parezca realmente maduro.

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Zenfone Serie)
Adaptador gráfico
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memoría
4096 MB 
pantalla
5.5 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 401 PPI, kapazitiver Touchscreen, 10 Multitouchpunkte, IPS, Super Wide-View Display, 2.5D Gorilla Glas,, lustroso: si
Disco duro
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB libre
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: kombinierte Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonklinke (3,5 mm), Card Reader: microSD bis 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Beschleunigungs-, Näherungs-, Hall- und RGB-Sensor, elektronischer Kompass, Gyroskop, Galileo, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast
Equipamento de red
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 und 19), LTE Cat. 12 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28 und 32 (alle FDD), 38, 39, 40 und 41 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 7.5 x 155.4 x 75.2
Battería
3300 mAh Litio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Sony IMX362 Dual Pixel (1/2.55", 1,4µm), f/1.8, 25 mm, 83° Weitwinkel, PDAF, 4-achsiger OIS, 3-achsiger EIS) + 8 MPix (120° Weitwinkel, 12 mm, f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (84° Weitwinkel, 24mm, f/2.0)
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereolautsprecher, Teclado: virtuell, Netzteil, USB-Kabel, SIM-Werkzeug, Hülle, Benutzerhandbuch, Headset, ZenUI 4.0, 24 Meses Garantía, UKW-Radio, DTS Headphone:X, High-Res-Audio, Dual-Mikrofon mit ASUS Noise-Reduction Technologie, VoLTE, Kopf-SAR: 0.96 W/kg, Körper-SAR: 1.53 W/kg, fanless
Peso
165 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 64 g
Precio
499 Euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

155.4 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 165 g156.2 mm 76.2 mm 6 mm 145 g154.2 mm 74.1 mm 7.25 mm 153 g151.5 mm 73.7 mm 7.9 mm 160 g147 mm 71 mm 7.5 mm 155 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.8 mm 158 g145.3 mm 69.3 mm 6.98 mm 144 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼90%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼83% -8%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼76% -15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼63% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 MBit/s ∼13% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼64% +4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼61%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼44% -29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼27% -55%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼26% -57%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 MBit/s ∼5% -91%
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click para cargar imágenes
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: wide-angle camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
ZenFone 4
ZenFone 4
Honor 9
Honor 9
BQ Aquaris X Pro
BQ Aquaris X Pro
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
628
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 656 cd/m² Médio: 634.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.25 cd/m²
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1640:1 (Negro: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
Gamma: 2.22
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Nokia 8
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3
Screen
-44%
-10%
7%
20%
-7%
-34%
Brightness middle
656
458
-30%
434
-34%
550
-16%
426
-35%
547
-17%
735
12%
Brightness
634
473
-25%
404
-36%
535
-16%
431
-32%
556
-12%
707
12%
Brightness Distribution
93
88
-5%
81
-13%
92
-1%
93
0%
86
-8%
92
-1%
Black Level *
0.4
0.51
-28%
0.42
-5%
0.43
-8%
0.79
-98%
Contrast
1640
898
-45%
1310
-20%
1272
-22%
930
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
7.1
-34%
4.4
17%
3.3
38%
1.6
70%
4.8
9%
6.7
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.8
14.5
-86%
8.6
-10%
4.5
42%
4.1
47%
8.8
-13%
12.9
-65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
10.5
-102%
4.2
19%
3.6
31%
1.7
67%
4.5
13%
8.3
-60%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.38 92%
2.25 98%
2.39 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
7905 82%
8951 73%
7343 89%
7226 90%
6329 103%
7194 90%
8906 73%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 11360 Hz ≤ 35 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 11360 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 35 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 11360 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 52 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 9747 (mínimo: 43 - máxmo: 142900) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
20.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6.8 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 22 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (25.4 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
52.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22 ms subida
↘ 30.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 87 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (40.7 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼25%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼24% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
67578 Points ∼25% -1%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼55% +120%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼65% +159%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼51% +105%
Nokia 8
177018 Points ∼65% +159%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼43%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼41% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4924 Points ∼41% -3%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼51% +20%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼55% +29%
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼52% +22%
Nokia 8
6959 Points ∼58% +37%
Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼32%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼30% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6096 Points ∼31% -3%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼36% +12%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼40% +25%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼37% +17%
Nokia 8
8282 Points ∼42% +32%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼38%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼40% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼53% +40%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼63% +68%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼53% +41%
Nokia 8
1262 Points ∼62% +65%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼4% -32%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
1006 Points ∼3% -33%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼14% +176%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼21% +311%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼14% +175%
Nokia 8
5958 Points ∼21% +298%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼17% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
928 Points ∼15% -33%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼52% +136%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼70% +221%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼44% +101%
Nokia 8
3540 Points ∼56% +157%
System (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼21% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3154 Points ∼19% -5%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼25% +25%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼36% +78%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼23% +15%
Nokia 8
5671 Points ∼34% +71%
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼16% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
412 Points ∼5% -73%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼33% +84%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼45% +150%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼31% +73%
Nokia 8
3505 Points ∼41% +132%
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3092 Points ∼7% -22%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼18% +103%
Huawei P10
9492 Points ∼22% +141%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼12% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4471 Points ∼12% +7%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼18% +56%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼19% +63%
Huawei P10
6521 Points ∼18% +56%
Nokia 8
6479 Points ∼18% +55%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼15% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
907 Points ∼14% +5%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼29% +116%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼31% +128%
Huawei P10
1899 Points ∼30% +120%
Nokia 8
1924 Points ∼30% +122%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼42%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼51% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2166 Points ∼51% +24%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼54% +31%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼72% +73%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼45% +9%
Nokia 8
3010 Points ∼71% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼6% -48%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
383 Points ∼6% -47%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼44% +285%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼59% +417%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼38% +232%
Nokia 8
3894 Points ∼61% +436%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼8% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
469 Points ∼9% -44%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼48% +219%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼65% +327%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼41% +172%
Nokia 8
3655 Points ∼66% +338%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼42%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼50% +19%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2167 Points ∼51% +21%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼43% +1%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼71% +69%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼52% +23%
Nokia 8
3002 Points ∼71% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼7% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
724 Points ∼7% -44%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼30% +132%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼48% +270%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼28% +118%
Nokia 8
5818 Points ∼58% +351%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼19%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼12% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
850 Points ∼12% -38%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼36% +90%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼59% +207%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼37% +93%
Nokia 8
4814 Points ∼67% +250%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼20% +31%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
17204 Points ∼20% +32%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼18% +16%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼22% +49%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼18% +18%
Nokia 8
20951 Points ∼24% +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% -28%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
13376 Points ∼3% -27%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼7% +112%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼11% +215%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼7% +96%
Nokia 8
56531 Points ∼11% +207%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼6% -17%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
14072 Points ∼6% -16%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼12% +72%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼17% +139%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼12% +64%
Nokia 8
40968 Points ∼17% +143%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼0% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
22 fps ∼0% -27%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼0% +100%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼1% +283%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼1% +130%
Nokia 8
99 fps ∼1% +230%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼1% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
23 fps ∼1% -21%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼2% +90%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼2% +107%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼2% +90%
Nokia 8
54 fps ∼2% +86%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
9.9 fps ∼2% -29%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼5% +114%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +336%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼5% +114%
Nokia 8
51 fps ∼9% +264%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% -31%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 fps ∼3% -29%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +100%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +300%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +129%
Nokia 8
31 fps ∼8% +121%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼0% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6.5 fps ∼0% -33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼0% +127%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼1% +333%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼1% +147%
Nokia 8
36 fps ∼1% +271%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼0% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
7 fps ∼0% -26%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼1% +132%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼1% +332%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼1% +163%
Nokia 8
17 fps ∼0% +79%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.5 fps ∼1% -34%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +183%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% +372%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% +183%
Nokia 8
24 fps ∼6% +353%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼2% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.8 fps ∼3% -28%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼11% +202%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼17% +372%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼11% +202%
Nokia 8
13 fps ∼9% +145%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼25%
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼61% +140%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei P10
37968 Points ∼86%
Medium Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei P10
43782 Points ∼97%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordenar por valor)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼4%
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼13% +249%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordenar por valor)
Huawei P10
60.5 fps ∼98%

Leyenda

 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Nokia 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼100% +155%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
63.365 Points ∼88% +126%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼82% +109%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼81% +106%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
32.796 Points ∼46% +17%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼37% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼100% +172%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
11131 Points ∼93% +153%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼86% +133%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼85% +132%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
5204 Points ∼44% +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼37% +1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼93% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
7667 ms * ∼81% +19%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
3159.8 ms * ∼34% +66%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼33% +67%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼33% +67%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼28% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
174 Points ∼100% +83%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼93% +69%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼78% +43%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼61% +13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼49% -9%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
85 Points ∼49% -11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLBQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9OnePlus 5Huawei P10Nokia 8Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
41%
105%
352%
51%
70%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-25%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-48%
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-52%
51.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
58.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-38%
76.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
79.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
7.59
12.07
59%
32.7
331%
19.3
154%
152.31
1907%
14.57
92%
47.9
531%
Random Read 4KB
68.57
37.97
-45%
55.7
-19%
141
106%
168.42
146%
145.73
113%
38.2
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.27
139.63
-32%
204
-1%
201.5
-2%
189.83
-8%
199.15
-3%
137.5
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.38
270.46
-6%
293
2%
748
160%
737.65
157%
680.39
137%
245.6
-15%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high32 fps
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 default58 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguracionesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máx.
 33.1 °C32.3 °C35.3 °C 
 33.4 °C32.1 °C34.4 °C 
 31.9 °C31.3 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
30.4 °C31 °C31.7 °C
29.6 °C30.4 °C31.4 °C
29.6 °C29.9 °C30.3 °C
Máximo: 31.7 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C
Conector de corriente  25.3 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.22532.929.23137.228.44031.7355039.633.46328.329.98027.329.610026.928.912526.727.51602432.720020.94325020.947.931519.55040018.55750017.565.563017.566.780015.772.2100015.869.6125016.670160015.870.3200015.469.6250015.572.931501672.5400015.868.150001669.9630016.371.8800016.369.41000016.264.31250016.461.11600016.455.5SPL28.682.2N1.152.8median 16.4median 66.7Delta2.11031.62725.426.225.331.132.930.533.627.731.626.928.425.32725.520.830.42240.121.347.720.849.721.256.919.460.919.564.217.767.517.972.317.876.317.376.917.477.116.774.117.272.718.274.917.972.617.674.317.773.517.874.517.978.818.177.818.270.43086.81.368.2median 17.9median 72.61.39.531.634.925.436.225.331.132.928.533.633.431.631.128.423.82724.820.829.62234.621.342.220.847.621.251.919.45619.557.917.759.717.962.517.864.817.366.117.467.516.77417.274.218.271.117.977.917.681.417.778.317.875.317.97318.170.518.263.73086.11.360median 17.9median 64.81.312hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLLenovo Moto Z2 PlayBQ Aquaris X Pro
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.84 / 2.31 / 2.33 Watt
Carga midlight 4.76 / 6.39 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
-12%
2%
-14%
-8%
56%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
0.67
20%
1.13
-35%
0.73
13%
0.83
1%
0.86
-2%
0.45
46%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.7
26%
2.25
3%
1.44
38%
2.1
9%
2.13
8%
0.78
66%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
1.78
24%
2.3
1%
1.5
36%
2.18
6%
2.16
7%
0.84
64%
Load Average *
4.76
4.42
7%
4.89
-3%
6.91
-45%
6.57
-38%
4.65
2%
1.69
64%
Load Maximum *
6.39
6.3
1%
7.99
-25%
8.51
-33%
9.32
-46%
9.99
-56%
3.79
41%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
27h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 62)
9h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 38min
Carga (máximo brillo)
4h 46min
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
6%
-12%
-10%
2%
-2%
33%
Reader / Idle
1665
1840
11%
1399
-16%
1534
-8%
1540
-8%
1506
-10%
1589
-5%
H.264
698
644
-8%
564
-19%
623
-11%
582
-17%
733
5%
946
36%
WiFi v1.3
562
730
30%
516
-8%
518
-8%
966
72%
650
16%
749
33%
Load
286
254
-11%
278
-3%
247
-14%
176
-38%
237
-17%
477
67%

Pro

+ construcción de gran calidad
+ Bluetooth 5.0 (con Oreo)
+ aptX HD
+ GPS rápido y preciso
+ ranura microSD
+ cámara principal excelente
+ buenos altavoces
+ display brillante de alto contraste

Contra

- sólo USB 2.0
- cargador débil
- PWM
- cámara gran angular deficiente
Asus ZenFone 4 (ZE554KL). Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Asus Alemania.
Asus ZenFone 4 (ZE554KL). Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Asus Alemania.

Asus logra ofrecer una continuación atractiva de su serie ZenFone con el ZenFone 4. Su diseño es elegante, pero sencillo, y su rendimiento de sistema nos convenció. Sus velocidades de conexión son impresionantes, con LTE Cat 13 y buen rendimiento WLAN. Junto con la CPU Snapdragon, han actualizado Bluetooth a su última iteración, y la geolocalización funciona muy bien. La GPU actualizada catapulta al ZenFone 4 hacia delante en su clase y su display es adecuado para el uso exterior. Por desgracia, usa PWM. 

Con el ZenFone 4, Asus ofrece un smartphone de equipación competitiva que casi no reveló defectos en nuestros tests. 

En general, el ZenFone 4 deja poco que criticar. Por desgracia, su puerto USB se conforma con el estándar USB-2.0 y la potencia del cargador incluido es demasiado baja para usar la tecnología de carga rápida anunciada para el smartphone. Nuestra impresión de la cámara de lente dual fue ambivalente: Si bien la cámara principal es excelente, la lente secundaria no lo logra y nos recuerda a los defectos del LG G5. La cámara puede producir fotos excelentes, sin lugar a duda, pero su segunda lente queda sin usarse. 

El ZenFone 4 también está pensado para los aficionados a la música con su audio de alta resolución, DTS y aptX HD, por no mencionar la clavija de auriculares integrada. A €500, parece algo caro, pero no obstante recomendamos de corazón el ZenFone 4. 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL - 12/01/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabado
91%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Ratón
94%
Conectividad
50 / 60 → 83%
Peso
91%
Battería
92%
Pantalla
86%
Rendimiento de juegos
41 / 63 → 65%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatura
93%
Ruido
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Cámara
79%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - media ponderada

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-12- 4 (Update: 2017-12- 4)