Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 130V

Intel Arc 130V

The Intel Arc Graphics 130V is an integrated graphics adapter that lower-end Intel Lunar Lake processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it has 7 Xe² architecture cores running at up to 1,850 MHz and 7 ray tracing units at its disposal.

DirectX 12 Ultimate is fully supported here and the iGPU also supports hardware-decoding a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. It can drive three SUHD 4320p monitors simultaneously via HDMI 2.1, eDP 1.5 and DP 2.1.

Just like it was with Meteor Lake, Intel taps its Foveros technology to build Lunar Lake chips meaning the iGPU and the CPU cores are found on different dies stacked on top of each other or next to each other.

Performance

Based on our in-house 140V testing results, we expect the 130V to be about as fast as the Radeon 780M for playable frame rates in most 2023 and some 2024 games at 1080p on low graphics settings.

Power consumption

Lunar Lake processors' power consumption figures are relatively modest at around 20 W to 30 W, with up to about a half of that getting consumed by the integrated GPU.

Gen13 / Xe² Serie

Arc 140V 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V 7 @ 1.85 GHz
Nombre CódigoLunar Lake iGPU
ArquitecturaXe²
Pipelines7 - unificado
Raytracing Cores7
Velocidad del núcleo1850 (Boost) MHz
Tipo de MemoriaLPDDR5x
Max. Cantidad de Memoria16 GB
Memoria Compartidasi
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
tecnología3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
CaracterísticasSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Fecha de Anuncio24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 7-Core
CPU in Arc 130VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
46732 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8255 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
251095 Points (28%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9964 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
9523 Points (8%)
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 -14%
8289 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -13%
8387 -12%
8553 -10%
8656 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 -8%
8851 -7%
9448 -1%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
9523
9569 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 1%
9603 1%
9708 2%
9840 3%
9910 4%
9950 4%
10005 5%
AMD Radeon 680M
10018 5%
...
59943 529%
max:
104201 994%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
104.7 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (10%)
3.3 -94%
...
44.4 -17%
44.86 -16%
45 -16%
45.07 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -10%
48.6 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
53.4
59.8 12%
61.4 15%
62.5 17%
62.7 17%
62.7 17%
62.8 18%
63.8 19%
64.7 21%
64.8 21%
...
536 904%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
141.2 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
25608 puntos (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
678 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1538 Samples/s (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
28.2 Watt (4%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
41.6 Watt (13%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
38.2 Watt (5%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
- Gama de valores de las pruebas para esta tarjeta gráfica
red legend - Valores medios de las pruebas para esta tarjeta gráfica
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Pruebas de juegos

Los siguientes benchmarks se derivan de nuestros benchmarks de los portátiles de análisis. El rendimiento depende de la memoria gráfica utilizada, velocidad de reloj, procesador, configuración del sistema, controladores y sistemas operativos. Así que los resultados no tienen que ser representativos de todos los portátiles con esta GPU. Para información más detallada sobre los resultados del benchmark, haga clic en el número de fps.

bajo 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
bajo 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
bajo 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
bajo 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
15  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
bajo 1920x1080 cinem.
8.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080 cinem.
7.3  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
bajo 1920x1080
66  fps    + Comparar
medio 1920x1080
56  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
41  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Comparar
» Jugable con todos los portátiles probados en ajustes de detalle alto.
bajo 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» No jugable la mayor parte de los portátiles probados.
bajo 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph